本文選題：納米技術(shù) + 專利　； 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：納米技術(shù)作為一門跨學(xué)科、跨產(chǎn)業(yè)的新興技術(shù)，是與生命科學(xué)、信息技術(shù)、能源科學(xué)并重的在21世紀(jì)具有戰(zhàn)略意義的重要領(lǐng)域。納米技術(shù)因?yàn)槠洹暗讓庸ぞ咝浴碧攸c(diǎn)，已經(jīng)橫跨電子信息學(xué)、生物學(xué)、動(dòng)力學(xué)、材料學(xué)等多個(gè)學(xué)科領(lǐng)域，對(duì)未來經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)的發(fā)展、國家安全、人民生活質(zhì)量的提高將產(chǎn)生難以估量的影響。納米技術(shù)作為高投入以及高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的新興技術(shù)，需要通過法律對(duì)其進(jìn)行有效地規(guī)制和保護(hù)，其中，最主要的法律保護(hù)形式便是專利保護(hù)。 根據(jù)各國的立法實(shí)踐，雖然納米技術(shù)及其產(chǎn)品已成為各國專利保護(hù)的客體，但其仍是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)界爭議的課題之一。在專利法律制度的框架下，“納米技術(shù)屬于發(fā)明還是發(fā)現(xiàn)”、“納米技術(shù)的不確定性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”、“授予納米技術(shù)發(fā)明專利權(quán)的實(shí)質(zhì)條件”、“納米技術(shù)專利客體的排除”都是需要慎重考慮的問題。 本文的主體內(nèi)容主要包括四個(gè)部分： 第一部分，先介紹了納米技術(shù)的基本概念，，接著闡述納米技術(shù)的應(yīng)用，總結(jié)出其具有“底層技術(shù)性”和“不確定性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”的特征。 第二部分，介紹了納米技術(shù)可專利客體的范圍。目前，各國對(duì)納米技術(shù)的可專利性已達(dá)成一定共識(shí)。但在納米技術(shù)可專利客體上，仍然存在發(fā)明與發(fā)現(xiàn)的區(qū)分和對(duì)涉及倫理道德風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的專利客體排除的問題。 第三部分，介紹了授予納米技術(shù)專利權(quán)的實(shí)質(zhì)條件。 第四部分，首先介紹了我國納米技術(shù)專利的困境，然后針對(duì)當(dāng)前困境，結(jié)合我國納米技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)化的實(shí)際情況，并考慮當(dāng)代科學(xué)技術(shù)、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展變化等因素，為擺脫困境提出了一些對(duì)策：改善納米技術(shù)專利立法，加強(qiáng)納米技術(shù)專利保護(hù)；改革專利授權(quán)行政機(jī)構(gòu)，提高專利審核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；構(gòu)建納米技術(shù)專利池，促進(jìn)納米技術(shù)專利實(shí)施；制定企業(yè)專利戰(zhàn)略計(jì)劃，獲得關(guān)鍵技術(shù)的競爭優(yōu)勢。 總之，我們要借鑒發(fā)達(dá)國家的豐富經(jīng)驗(yàn)，完善我國納米技術(shù)專利保護(hù)體系，促進(jìn)納米技術(shù)的發(fā)展，搶占納米技術(shù)的制高點(diǎn)，同時(shí)也要采取積極措施推動(dòng)納米技術(shù)的產(chǎn)業(yè)化進(jìn)程。
[Abstract]:Nanotechnology, as an interdisciplinary and cross-industry emerging technology, is an important field of strategic significance in the 21st century, which attaches equal importance to life science, information technology and energy science. Nanotechnology, because of its "underlying instrumental" characteristics, has spanned many disciplines such as electronic informatics, biology, dynamics, materials science, and so on, to the future economic and social development, national security, The improvement of people's quality of life will have an incalculable effect. As a new technology with high investment and high risk, nanotechnology needs to be regulated and protected effectively by law. The most important form of legal protection is patent protection. According to the legislative practice of various countries, although nanotechnology and its products have become the object of patent protection in various countries, they are still one of the controversial topics in intellectual property rights field. Within the framework of the patent legal system, "nanotechnology belongs to invention or discovery", "uncertainty risk of nanotechnology", "essential conditions for granting patent rights to nanotechnology inventions", The exclusion of the patent object of nanotechnology is an issue that needs to be carefully considered. The main content of this paper includes four parts: the first part introduces the basic concept of nanotechnology, and then describes the application of nanotechnology. It has the characteristics of "bottom technology" and "uncertainty risk". In the second part, the scope of patentable object of nanotechnology is introduced. At present, countries have reached a certain consensus on the patentability of nanotechnology. However, on the patentable object of nanotechnology, the distinction between invention and discovery and the exclusion of patent object involving ethical hazard still exist. In the third part, the essential conditions of granting patent right to nanotechnology are introduced. The fourth part first introduces the dilemma of the patent of nanotechnology in China, and then in view of the current dilemma, combining with the actual situation of the industrialization of nanotechnology in our country, and considering the factors such as contemporary science and technology, economic development and change, etc. In order to get rid of the predicament, some countermeasures are put forward: to improve the patent legislation of nanotechnology, to strengthen the patent protection of nanotechnology, to reform the administrative organization of patent authorization, to improve the standard of patent examination, to construct the patent pool of nanotechnology, and to promote the implementation of patent on nanotechnology; Make the patent strategic plan of the enterprise, obtain the competitive advantage of the key technology. In short, we should learn from the rich experience of developed countries, perfect the patent protection system of nanotechnology in China, promote the development of nanotechnology, seize the commanding point of nanotechnology, and take active measures to promote the industrialization of nanotechnology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白春禮;全面理解納米科技內(nèi)涵 促進(jìn)納米科技在我國的健康發(fā)展[J];微納電子技術(shù);2003年01期

2 張路;公眾可以評(píng)論科學(xué)——從查爾斯對(duì)待科學(xué)的態(tài)度談起[J];百科知識(shí);2005年12期

3 王雯娜;;從非顯而易見性看中藥專利保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年03期

4 周江華;丁璇;王琛;王孝平;;納米技術(shù)專利戰(zhàn)略分析報(bào)告[J];高科技與產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2010年08期

5 楊鶯歌;;納米技術(shù)專利分類研究[J];微納電子技術(shù);2007年12期

6 楠木;納米反思[J];科技信息;2003年09期

7 欒春娟;侯海燕;;全球納米技術(shù)領(lǐng)域?qū)＠?jì)量分析[J];科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年04期

8 白春禮;納米科技及其發(fā)展前景[J];科學(xué)通報(bào);2001年02期

9 王明,鄒曉東;美國加州納米技術(shù)研究院創(chuàng)新運(yùn)營模式及其啟示[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2005年08期

10 郭穎;朱東華;蘇源;;納米技術(shù)專利的法律狀態(tài)信息分析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2009年03期

本文編號(hào)：2040042