本文選題：職務(wù)發(fā)明 + 報酬制度�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：當今的世界是科技的世界,掌握了先進科技的國家必定走在世界的前列。而衡量先進技術(shù)的標準就在于該國職務(wù)發(fā)明的質(zhì)量與數(shù)量,而我國的職務(wù)發(fā)明無論在質(zhì)量上,還是在數(shù)量上都與世界發(fā)達國家有較大差距。另外我國職務(wù)發(fā)明總量占發(fā)明總量的比例一直低于歐美等發(fā)達國家,該現(xiàn)象背后的原因是多種多樣的,但法律制度上的缺陷不容忽視。職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度作為職務(wù)發(fā)明制度的重要一環(huán),其本身的完善與否很大程度上決定了一國科技水平的高低。目前,該制度雖已初步實現(xiàn)對職務(wù)發(fā)明人,設(shè)計人的權(quán)益保護,但仍存在保護范圍不夠廣,保護力度不夠強,保護措施不夠及時等問題,若能在現(xiàn)有基礎(chǔ)上進一步完善,對我國科技創(chuàng)新水平的提升將大有裨益。 本文總共分為五章,從職務(wù)發(fā)明法律制度的由來談起,并通過一系列的理論研究和案例研究,最終對職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度的完善給出較為全面的建議,內(nèi)容大致如下： 第一章,職務(wù)發(fā)明法律制度概述。從明確職務(wù)發(fā)明制度的概念,追溯職務(wù)發(fā)明制度的由來入手引出職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度這一概念,再簡單介紹我國職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度的產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展,同時廓清職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬與科技獎勵之間的界限,最后通過引用專利統(tǒng)計年報,對完善職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度的意義進行深入思考。 第二章,職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度理論基礎(chǔ)和歷史比較。前半章通過對現(xiàn)今職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬性質(zhì)的學(xué)說進行比較分析,否定了“債權(quán)客體說”與“勞動報酬說”,進而指出“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)說”合理之處。后半章則從歷史的維度將《專利法》和《專利法實施細則》中有關(guān)職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度的條文進行比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)其中積極進步之處。 第三章,國外職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度和對中國的啟示。對美國的0TL模式,德國的《雇員發(fā)明法》,日本的《特許法》等內(nèi)容進入深入探究,并結(jié)合我國的立法現(xiàn)狀,得出世界優(yōu)秀法律制度對中國的啟示。 第四章,我國職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬給付現(xiàn)狀。通過對三個典型案例的思考,發(fā)掘出我國現(xiàn)行制度實施與運行存在的問題,主要表現(xiàn)為法律法規(guī)在制定上存在空白,法律法規(guī)雖有制定但有欠缺,單位員工維權(quán)意識淡薄和工會力量薄弱無力這四方面。 第五章,我國職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度的完善。在全文的研究基礎(chǔ)上,對我國職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬制度的完善提出系統(tǒng)性的建議。首先,需要從理論上準確認知職務(wù)發(fā)明報酬權(quán),即知識產(chǎn)權(quán)；然后,從規(guī)范法律用語,設(shè)定合理報酬提取比例,豐富統(tǒng)一報酬支付方式和健全報酬計算方法這四個方面提出立法建議；最后,還應(yīng)從完善相關(guān)配套制度的角度來促進法律制度的實施。
[Abstract]:Today's world is the world of science and technology, the country with advanced technology must be in the forefront of the world. The standard of measuring advanced technology lies in the quality and quantity of the job invention in our country, and the quality and quantity of the job invention in our country are far from those of the developed countries in the world. In addition, the proportion of the total number of job inventions to the total number of inventions in China has been lower than that of developed countries such as Europe and the United States. The reasons behind this phenomenon are various, but the defects in the legal system should not be ignored. As an important part of the duty invention system, the compensation system of duty invention determines the level of science and technology of a country to a great extent. At present, although the system has preliminarily realized the protection of the rights and interests of job inventors and designers, there are still some problems, such as the scope of protection is not wide enough, the intensity of protection is not strong enough, and the protection measures are not timely enough. If the system can be further improved on the existing basis, It will be of great benefit to the improvement of the level of scientific and technological innovation in our country. This article is divided into five chapters, starting from the origin of the legal system of job invention, and through a series of theoretical studies and case studies, finally gives more comprehensive recommendations on the perfection of the compensation system of job invention, the content of which is as follows: The first chapter is an overview of the legal system of duty invention. The concept of the compensation system of duty invention is introduced from the definition of the system of duty invention, the origin of the system of duty invention is traced back, and the emergence and development of the reward system of duty invention in our country are briefly introduced. At the same time, the paper clarifies the boundary between the reward of duty invention and the reward of science and technology. Finally, by citing the annual report of patent statistics, the significance of perfecting the reward system of duty invention is deeply considered. The second chapter, the theoretical basis and historical comparison of the compensation system of duty invention. In the first half of this chapter, the author makes a comparative analysis of the nature of compensation for present duty inventions, denies the "object of creditor's rights" and "labor remuneration", and then points out the reasonableness of "intellectual property right theory". The latter part compares the articles of Patent Law and the detailed rules of Patent Law about the compensation system of duty inventions from the historical dimension, and finds out the positive progress in the articles. The third chapter, the compensation system of foreign duty invention and its enlightenment to China. The contents of American 0TL model, German employee's invention law and Japan's charter law are deeply explored, and the enlightenment of the world's excellent legal system to China is obtained by combining the current legislative situation of our country. The fourth chapter, our country duty invention reward payment present situation. Through the thinking of three typical cases, the problems existing in the implementation and operation of the current system of our country have been discovered. The main manifestation is that there are gaps in the formulation of laws and regulations, although the laws and regulations are formulated, they are deficient. Unit employees weak awareness of the rights and weak trade unions in these four areas. The fifth chapter, our country duty invention reward system consummation. On the basis of the research, the paper puts forward systematic suggestions on the perfection of the compensation system of duty invention in our country. First of all, we need to recognize the right to compensation for job inventions in theory, that is, intellectual property rights, and then, from the perspective of regulating legal terms, to set a reasonable proportion of remuneration to be drawn. Finally, it is necessary to promote the implementation of the legal system from the angle of perfecting the relevant supporting system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42
，

本文編號：1991486