商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)沖突法律問(wèn)題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-06-04 14:38
本文選題:商標(biāo)權(quán) + 商號(hào)權(quán) ; 參考:《南昌大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文
【摘要】: 近年來(lái),商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)的沖突在司法實(shí)踐中愈演愈烈。盡管我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的商標(biāo)法、反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法以及相關(guān)的行政法規(guī)對(duì)二者的沖突進(jìn)行了一定程度的規(guī)制,但是馳名商號(hào)被搶注成商標(biāo)或者馳名商標(biāo)被登記為商號(hào)的情形仍常有發(fā)生,現(xiàn)有的法律法規(guī)未能妥善解決兩權(quán)的沖突。正是在這樣的背景下,本文的構(gòu)思便產(chǎn)生了。 本文除了引言與結(jié)論,共分為四個(gè)部分。 第一部分主要闡述商標(biāo)權(quán)、商號(hào)權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)理論,并對(duì)“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突”、“商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)沖突”等相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了界定。第二部分對(duì)我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)沖突的表現(xiàn)形式及其原因進(jìn)行了分析。第三部分考察了主要資本主義國(guó)家關(guān)于規(guī)制商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)沖突的法律規(guī)定,并分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律制度對(duì)解決商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)沖突的規(guī)定以及存在的問(wèn)題。最后一個(gè)部分主要是對(duì)完善我國(guó)商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號(hào)權(quán)沖突解決機(jī)制提出的思考與建議。筆者提出應(yīng)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一立法,改革現(xiàn)行商號(hào)行政管理體制,,建立商標(biāo)與商號(hào)一體化保護(hù)體系,以最大程度的避免兩權(quán)的沖突。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the conflict between trademark right and trade name right is becoming more and more serious in judicial practice. Although our country's existing trademark law, anti-unfair competition law and related administrative regulations regulate the conflict to a certain extent, the well-known trade name is often recorded as a trademark or a well-known trademark is registered as a trade name. Existing laws and regulations fail to properly resolve the conflict between the two rights. It is in this context, the idea of this paper came into being. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part mainly expounds the basic theory of trademark right and trade name right, and defines the relevant concepts such as "conflict of intellectual property right" and "conflict of trademark right and trade name right". The second part analyzes the manifestation and reason of the conflict between trademark right and trade name right in our country. The third part examines the legal provisions of major capitalist countries on regulating the conflict between trademark rights and trademark rights, and analyzes the provisions and existing problems of the current legal system of our country for resolving the conflicts between trademark rights and trademark rights. The last part is to perfect the conflict resolution mechanism of trademark right and trade name right. The author puts forward that unified legislation should be carried out to reform the current administrative system of business name and establish an integrated protection system of trademark and trade name so as to avoid the conflict between the two rights to the greatest extent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2007
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D923.43
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 王磊;論企業(yè)名稱權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)沖突的解決機(jī)制[D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年
本文編號(hào):1977742
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1977742.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著