本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專(zhuān)門(mén)法院 + 技術(shù)調(diào)查官��； 參考：《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)》2017年08期

【摘要】：技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度的實(shí)施是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專(zhuān)門(mén)法院所進(jìn)行的一項(xiàng)重要司法審判改革,也是最高人民法院在《關(guān)于在北京、上海、廣州設(shè)立知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法院的決定》實(shí)施滿(mǎn)三年后向全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)報(bào)告決定實(shí)施情況的重要組成部分。論文以技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度為考察對(duì)象,詳細(xì)比較中國(guó)和日本技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度的基本內(nèi)容及實(shí)施情況,分析我國(guó)技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度實(shí)施中存在的問(wèn)題并提出相應(yīng)的完善建議,認(rèn)為應(yīng)由最高人民法院統(tǒng)一制定關(guān)于技術(shù)調(diào)查官的工作規(guī)范和管理選拔辦法,避免技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度在不同知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法院實(shí)施中出現(xiàn)差異,從而影響技術(shù)調(diào)查官作為司法輔助人員的中立性和權(quán)威性。
[Abstract]:The implementation of the system of technical investigators is an important judicial reform carried out by the specialized intellectual property courts, and it is also the Supreme people's Court in Beijing, Shanghai, The decision to set up an intellectual property Court in Guangzhou is an important part of reporting the implementation of the decision to the standing Committee of the National people's Congress three years after its implementation. Taking the technical investigator system as the object of investigation, this paper compares in detail the basic contents and implementation of the technical investigator system in China and Japan, analyzes the problems existing in the implementation of the technical investigator system in China and puts forward corresponding suggestions for perfection. Considering that the Supreme people's Court should uniformly formulate the rules for the work of technical investigators and the measures for their management and selection, so as to avoid differences in the implementation of the system of technical investigators in different intellectual property courts, Thus affecting the technical investigation officer as a judicial assistant personnel neutrality and authority.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)中心;中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金青年基金項(xiàng)目“生物技術(shù)背景下我國(guó)植物新品種保護(hù)對(duì)策研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):13CFX087)研究成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 黃琨;論我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判中技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度的再造[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

2 賀偉;專(zhuān)利訴訟中技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

3 竇川;中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度研究[D];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

4 蔣竹婷;關(guān)于我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法院技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度思考[D];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年

5 范秀榮;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)技術(shù)調(diào)查官制度研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1972678