本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù) + 高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力��； 參考：《浙江理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和科技高速發(fā)展的背景下，世界經(jīng)濟(jì)正由傳統(tǒng)的以原材料、資本和大量耗能為特征的傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟(jì)模式向以信息和知識為導(dǎo)向的知識經(jīng)濟(jì)模式轉(zhuǎn)變。我國正處于社會經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時期， 十二五‖規(guī)劃明確指出，堅持把科技進(jìn)步和創(chuàng)新作為加快轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式的重要支撐，而知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度作為激勵創(chuàng)新和促進(jìn)技術(shù)進(jìn)步政策的重要性也日益凸顯。長期以來，關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與經(jīng)濟(jì)的研究多集中于發(fā)達(dá)國家；關(guān)于中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度測算的研究起步較晚且多側(cè)重于理論方面；近年來，也不乏實證方面的研究，但都是分析其對FDI、國際貿(mào)易、經(jīng)濟(jì)增長等方面的影響。因此，結(jié)合中國國情，實證研究知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力的影響具有重要的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。 首先，本文以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)為出發(fā)點，系統(tǒng)的梳理相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)；然后，基于產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力理論以及技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和技術(shù)擴(kuò)散相關(guān)理論，研究知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力的影響；接下來，對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)影響我國高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力進(jìn)行了初步統(tǒng)計觀察，在此基礎(chǔ)上，展開實證研究分析中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的影響并分區(qū)域比較影響方向和程度；最后，，綜合研究結(jié)論和我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀特征，圍繞提升知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平、制定適度的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度和提升高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力等方面提出了相關(guān)政策建議。 總體回歸結(jié)果表明，我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力有顯著的促進(jìn)作用；政府的支持力度、投入研究的經(jīng)費強(qiáng)度、人均GDP均對高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力有積極影響；投入研究的人員強(qiáng)度抑制了高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的競爭力。但是，分區(qū)域研究結(jié)果顯示，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)促進(jìn)了東部地區(qū)、西部地區(qū)和東北地區(qū)的高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力，卻阻礙了中部地區(qū)的高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力；政府支持力度、RD經(jīng)費強(qiáng)度與人均GDP對四區(qū)域的高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力一致存在積極影響；RD人力強(qiáng)度對東部和中部地區(qū)的高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力作用為正，但對西部和東北地區(qū)的高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力作用為負(fù)。因此，總體來說加強(qiáng)我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度有利于高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力的提升，但也存在一定的區(qū)域差異。 綜上所述，在目前中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平不高的情況下，應(yīng)進(jìn)一步加大知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)力度，加強(qiáng)政府的支持力度和投入研究的經(jīng)費強(qiáng)度，提高投入研究的人力強(qiáng)度轉(zhuǎn)化率。具體可以從以下幾個角度出發(fā)改善現(xiàn)有狀況：（1）建立健全知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度，著力提升執(zhí)法力度；（2）結(jié)合中國國情制定與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展相匹配的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度；（3）各地區(qū)因地制宜，根據(jù)自身情況適當(dāng)加強(qiáng)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平；（4）加大政府對高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的資金支持；（5）推進(jìn)產(chǎn)學(xué)研一體化，提升創(chuàng)新技術(shù)利用率。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization and the rapid development of science and technology, the world economy is changing from a traditional economic model characterized by raw materials, capital and energy consumption to a knowledge-based economy model guided by information and knowledge. Our country is in a critical period of social and economic transformation. The 12th Five-Year Plan clearly points out that we should adhere to scientific and technological progress and innovation as an important support for accelerating the transformation of the mode of economic development. The importance of intellectual property system as a policy to stimulate innovation and promote technological progress is becoming increasingly prominent. For a long time, the research on intellectual property and economy has focused on the developed countries; the research on the intensity of intellectual property protection in China started relatively late and focused on the theoretical aspects; in recent years, there have also been many empirical studies. However, it is the analysis of its FDI, international trade, economic growth and other aspects of the impact. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the impact of intellectual property protection on the competitiveness of high technology industry. Firstly, this paper systematically combs the relevant literature based on the intellectual property protection, and then, based on the theory of industrial competitiveness and technology innovation and technology diffusion, the paper studies the impact of intellectual property protection on the competitiveness of high-tech industries. Then, the paper makes a preliminary statistical observation on the impact of intellectual property protection on the competitiveness of high-tech industries in China. On this basis, it conducts an empirical study to analyze the impact of intellectual property rights on high-tech industries in China and to compare the direction and degree of influence among different regions. Finally, based on the conclusion of the research and the characteristics of the current situation of intellectual property protection in China, this paper puts forward some relevant policy suggestions on improving the level of intellectual property protection, formulating appropriate intellectual property protection system and enhancing the competitiveness of high-tech industries. The overall regression results show that intellectual property protection has a significant role in promoting the competitiveness of high-tech industries, the government's support, research funding intensity, per capita GDP have a positive impact on the competitiveness of high-tech industries. The strength of the research staff inhibits the competitiveness of the high-tech industry. However, the results of sub-regional research show that intellectual property protection promotes the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the eastern, western and northeast regions, but hinders the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the central region. The intensity of R D funding and GDP per capita have positive effects on the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the eastern and central regions, and the positive effects of R D manpower strength on the competitiveness of high-tech industries in the eastern and central regions are positive. But to the west and the northeast area high-tech industry competitive effect is negative. Therefore, strengthening the intensity of intellectual property protection is conducive to the promotion of high-tech industry competitiveness, but there are some regional differences. To sum up, under the condition that the level of intellectual property protection in China is not high, we should further strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, strengthen the support of the government and the funding intensity of investment research, and improve the conversion rate of manpower intensity of investment research. In particular, we can improve the existing situation from the following angles: 1) establish and improve the system of intellectual property protection. Work hard to enhance the enforcement of the law and formulate an intellectual property protection system in line with China's national conditions that matches economic and social development.) all regions should take measures according to local conditions. Strengthen the level of intellectual property protection according to its own situation (4) increase the government's financial support to high-tech industry (5) promote the integration of industry, education and research, improve the utilization rate of innovation technology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F204;F276.44;F121.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡昭玲;;國際垂直專業(yè)化對中國工業(yè)競爭力的影響分析[J];財經(jīng)研究;2007年04期

2 柒江藝;許和連;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的進(jìn)口貿(mào)易效應(yīng):擴(kuò)張或壟斷?——基于中國高技術(shù)產(chǎn)品進(jìn)口貿(mào)易的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)研究;2011年01期

3 王玉;許俊斌;南洋;;中國各地區(qū)制造業(yè)競爭力及其影響因素的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)研究;2011年02期

4 嚴(yán)兵;;FDI與中國出口競爭力——基于地區(qū)差異視角的分析[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年08期

5 陳立敏,譚力文;評價中國制造業(yè)國際競爭力的實證方法研究——兼與波特指標(biāo)及產(chǎn)業(yè)分類法比較[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年05期

6 文東偉;冼國明;;垂直專業(yè)化與中國制造業(yè)貿(mào)易競爭力[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年06期

7 劉林青;李文秀;張亞婷;;比較優(yōu)勢、FDI和民族產(chǎn)業(yè)國際競爭力——“中國制造”國際競爭力的脆弱性分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年08期

8 董敏杰;梁泳梅;李鋼;;環(huán)境規(guī)制對中國出口競爭力的影響——基于投入產(chǎn)出表的分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年03期

9 王建剛,于英川;我國高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力比較研究[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年01期

10 陳麗靜;顧國達(dá);;技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對中國進(jìn)口商品結(jié)構(gòu)的影響——基于1986-2007年時間序列數(shù)據(jù)的實證分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2011年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 徐光瑞;我國高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 孔偉杰;基于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的國際技術(shù)溢出與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1946156