本文選題：技術(shù)改進(jìn) + 專利侵權(quán)��； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)是指基于有效專利技術(shù)產(chǎn)品或?qū)＠椒?進(jìn)行技術(shù)的優(yōu)化與創(chuàng)造,形成具有新質(zhì)和優(yōu)勢的先進(jìn)新技術(shù)。改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)侵權(quán)是指改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)這種新技術(shù)可能形成的侵權(quán)行為。改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)侵權(quán)的種類有直接侵權(quán)和間接侵權(quán),而判斷原則是全面覆蓋原則和等同原則。專利技術(shù)改進(jìn)作為一種技術(shù)創(chuàng)新方式在我國現(xiàn)階段普遍存在,專利技術(shù)改進(jìn)、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的交融、傳承、互動關(guān)系,改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)侵權(quán)問題研究等對我國現(xiàn)階段技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和長遠(yuǎn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展而言都具有重大的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義�，F(xiàn)實(shí)性和復(fù)雜性使改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)侵權(quán)難以認(rèn)定,我國目前在這方面的立法及實(shí)踐也還很不完善。專利保護(hù)的中心限定原則、周邊限定原則、主題內(nèi)容限定原則是專利侵權(quán)判斷的基礎(chǔ),全面覆蓋原則和等同原則、禁止反悔原則是改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定的一般原則,權(quán)利用盡、默認(rèn)許可則是侵權(quán)抗辯原則。我國專利法第十一條中規(guī)定未權(quán)利化的改進(jìn)專利技術(shù)構(gòu)成侵權(quán),雖能夠保護(hù)權(quán)利人利益,但有違專利法第一條中鼓勵創(chuàng)新的立法宗旨,也陷入了先進(jìn)技術(shù)侵害落后技術(shù)權(quán)利的悖論。因此,日本政府在專利技術(shù)改進(jìn)方面采取的適當(dāng)干預(yù)策略,值得我國進(jìn)行借鑒。目前我國的專利許可制度,還有在專利技術(shù)改進(jìn)方面的立法定義、司法解釋和執(zhí)法實(shí)踐,均需要細(xì)化和明確,增強(qiáng)其可操作性。
[Abstract]:The improvement of patent technology refers to the optimization and creation of technology based on effective patented technology products or patent methods, and the formation of advanced and new technologies with new qualities and advantages. Improving patent technology infringement refers to the possible infringement of the new technology of improving patent technology. There are direct infringement and indirect infringement in improving patent technology infringement, while the judgment principle is comprehensive coverage principle and equivalent principle. Patent technology improvement, as a way of technological innovation, is prevalent in our country at the present stage. Patent technology improvement, technological innovation and intellectual property rights are intermingled, inherited, and interacted with each other. It is of great practical significance to improve the research on patent technology infringement for the present stage of technological innovation and long-term economic development in China. The reality and complexity make it difficult to determine the patent infringement, and the legislation and practice in this respect are not perfect. The central principle of patent protection, the principle of peripheral limitation, the principle of subject content limitation are the basis of judging patent infringement, the principle of comprehensive coverage and the principle of equivalence, the principle of estoppel is the general principle to improve the recognition of patent technology infringement, The right is exhausted, the default permission is the infringement defense principle. Article 11 of the Patent Law of our country stipulates that the unauthorized improvement of patented technology constitutes an infringement, although it can protect the interests of the obligee, but it is contrary to the legislative purpose of encouraging innovation in Article 1 of the Patent Law. It is also caught in the paradox of advanced technology encroaching on backward technological rights. Therefore, the appropriate intervention strategy adopted by the Japanese government in patent technology improvement is worthy of our country's reference. At present, the patent licensing system in China, as well as the legislative definition of patent technology improvement, judicial interpretation and law enforcement practice, need to be refined and clear to enhance its operability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姚頡靖;彭輝;;德國專利法及其判例:“試驗(yàn)性使用”豁免原則的演進(jìn)[J];德國研究;2009年01期

2 李斌;黨凱;;淺談專利侵權(quán)判定中的禁止反悔原則的適用[J];法制與社會;2008年30期

3 林洋帆;;淺談中小企業(yè)模仿創(chuàng)新[J];發(fā)展研究;2009年03期

4 鄭成思;中國需要怎樣的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略[J];航天工業(yè)管理;2004年06期

5 陳海華;謝富紀(jì);;日本技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式的演進(jìn)及其發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2008年01期

6 王惠賢;;日本技術(shù)引進(jìn)體制及對中國的啟示——產(chǎn)官學(xué)一體的引進(jìn)體制以及后續(xù)研發(fā)體制[J];技術(shù)與創(chuàng)新管理;2010年01期

7 年志遠(yuǎn);中小企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的模式選擇——模仿創(chuàng)新[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2004年06期

8 馬山水;;模仿創(chuàng)新:我國中小企業(yè)不可逾越的階段[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2010年04期

9 曹勇;胡歡歡;;專利保護(hù)與企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新之間的聯(lián)動關(guān)系探討[J];情報(bào)雜志;2009年04期

10 楊云霞;;TRIZ理論應(yīng)用中的專利侵權(quán)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析[J];情報(bào)雜志;2009年08期

，

本文編號：1887914