本文選題：專利 + 侵權(quán)��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來，我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展取得了長足的進(jìn)步，隨著商品貿(mào)易的流通性的不斷增強，我國的專利相關(guān)的交易也越來越多。從1984年專利法立法至今，我國的專利理論和法律實踐日漸豐富，各類專利案件也層出不窮，盡管我國的專利法已歷經(jīng)三次修訂，但鑒于法律的滯后性、穩(wěn)定性以及法律實踐中的復(fù)雜性，現(xiàn)有的專利法律法規(guī)仍不能滿足審判的需要。其中之一就是專利默示許可相關(guān)立法的空缺。 專利默示許可，作為一種侵權(quán)抗辯理由，是指在一定情形下，專利權(quán)人以非明示許可的默示行為，讓專利使用人產(chǎn)生其被允許使用該專利的合理信賴的一種專利許可形態(tài)。這與傳統(tǒng)的明示許可的方式有很大的不同。從其行使方式來看，作為侵權(quán)抗辯理由，專利默示許可在一定程度上限制了專利權(quán)人的權(quán)利行使，但從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的整體來看，保障和限制都是構(gòu)建完善的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的相輔相成的兩個方面，只有有效的限制，防止權(quán)利濫用，才能更好的保護(hù)。尤其是在我國一直比較注重專利權(quán)的保護(hù)的傳統(tǒng)下，協(xié)調(diào)好對專利權(quán)人的保護(hù)和社會公共利益的保障就顯得更為重要，否則，過分強調(diào)專利權(quán)的專利制度最終將阻礙經(jīng)濟(jì)社會的發(fā)展。 在一些國家，尤其是美國，專利默示許可理論早已出現(xiàn)并逐漸發(fā)展成熟，但鑒于我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度建立起步較晚，這一理論在我國還處于萌芽階段。這與我國實務(wù)中出現(xiàn)的相關(guān)專利案件的數(shù)量是分不開的。近十年來，我國的專利制度日臻成熟，相關(guān)的專利交易也越來越多，繁多的貿(mào)易也促發(fā)了專利侵權(quán)糾紛案件的多樣化，專利默示許可相關(guān)的案件也逐漸顯現(xiàn)。充分地運用好專利默示許可規(guī)則抗辯，有利于提升對相對人的保護(hù)，從而更好的促進(jìn)交易安全，促進(jìn)專利貿(mào)易的發(fā)展，也有利于在國際交往中更好的維護(hù)我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)利益。但目前我國的立法對此仍處于空白，相關(guān)的理論研究也較少，，至今仍未有一本專門研究中國專利默示許可的專著，只有少量的學(xué)術(shù)論文。因此，對專利默示許可規(guī)則進(jìn)行探究，既是豐富法學(xué)理論的需要，也是法律實踐的要求。 專利默示許可的產(chǎn)生情形有很多，本文從中選取兩種情形，即基于銷售和基于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)產(chǎn)生的專利默示許可作為出發(fā)點進(jìn)行探討，選擇這兩點主要是考慮到目前我國法律規(guī)定和審判實踐中的現(xiàn)實，希望能從現(xiàn)有的這兩個典型情形出發(fā)，探求我國專利默示許可的一般規(guī)則，包括專利默示許可的認(rèn)定條件、主要內(nèi)容等，完善我國的專利默示許可理論。 本文主要采用比較研究、案例分析等方法，力求從我國的專利侵權(quán)糾紛相關(guān)案件中窺探出我國專利默示許可規(guī)則的適用現(xiàn)狀，同時結(jié)合國際上尤其是美國的專利默示許可理論，尋求一套適合我國的專利默示許可規(guī)則。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economic and social development has made considerable progress. With the increasing circulation of commodity trade, there are more and more patent related transactions in China. Since the patent law legislation in 1984, patent theory and legal practice in our country have become more and more abundant, and various patent cases have emerged in endlessly. Although the patent law of our country has been revised three times, but in view of the lag of the law, Stability and complexity in legal practice, the existing patent laws and regulations still can not meet the needs of the trial. One of them is the absence of patent implied licensing legislation. Patent implied license, as a kind of infringement defense, refers to a patent license form in which the patentee acquires the reasonable trust that the patentee is allowed to use the patent with the implied act of non-express license under certain circumstances. This is very different from the traditional way of express permission. In terms of the way it is exercised, as a defense of infringement, patent implied license restricts the exercise of the rights of the patentee to a certain extent, but from the perspective of the overall protection of intellectual property rights, Protection and restriction are two complementary aspects of building a perfect intellectual property protection system. Only by effective restriction to prevent abuse of rights can better protection be achieved. In particular, under the tradition that our country has been paying more attention to the protection of patent rights, it is even more important to coordinate the protection of patentees and the protection of social and public interests. The patent system with too much emphasis on patent rights will eventually hinder the economic and social development. In some countries, especially in the United States, patent implied license theory has appeared and developed gradually, but in view of the late establishment of intellectual property legal system in China, this theory is still in its infancy. This is related to the number of patent cases in China's practice is inseparable. In recent ten years, the patent system of our country has matured day by day, the related patent transaction is more and more, the various trade has also promoted the diversification of the patent infringement dispute case, the patent implied license related case also gradually appears. Making full use of patent implied license rules defense is conducive to the promotion of the protection of the relative person, thus better promoting the transaction security, promoting the development of patent trade, and also conducive to the better protection of intellectual property rights interests in international exchanges. However, at present, the legislation of our country is still blank, the relevant theoretical research is also relatively few, so far there is not a monograph devoted to the implied license of patent in China, only a small number of academic papers. Therefore, the exploration of patent implied license rules is not only the need of rich legal theory, but also the requirement of legal practice. There are many cases of patent implied licensing. This paper selects two cases, namely, patent implied license based on sale and standard, as the starting point. The choice of these two points is mainly to take into account the current legal provisions and the reality of the trial practice in our country. We hope that we can explore the general rules of patent implied licensing in our country, including the conditions for the determination of patent implied licenses, from these two typical cases. The main content and so on, consummates our country patent implied license theory. This paper mainly uses comparative research, case analysis and other methods to explore the current situation of patent implied licensing rules in China from the relevant cases of patent infringement disputes in China, and combine with the patent implied licensing theory in the world, especially in the United States. To seek a set of patent tacit licensing rules suitable for our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 丁以升,孫麗娟;論我國法院公共政策創(chuàng)制功能的建構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)評論;2005年05期

2 袁真富;;基于侵權(quán)抗辯之專利默示許可探究[J];法學(xué);2010年12期

3 韋曉云;;專利的默認(rèn)許可[J];人民司法;2007年17期

4 浩然;王國柱;;論信賴保護(hù)理論對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)默示許可制度的支撐[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2013年05期

本文編號：1885972