本文選題：職務發(fā)明 + 獎酬權��； 參考：《山東大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前,世界經濟增長正快速轉變?yōu)橹R創(chuàng)新導向型發(fā)展模式,知識產權正日益成為經濟增長的主要推動力,在世界主要創(chuàng)新型國家中,以職務發(fā)明為核心的科學技術創(chuàng)新能力、知識產權管理能力日益成為決定國家經濟增長潛力和綜合競爭能力的關鍵因素。職務發(fā)明的強弱之所以能成為一國發(fā)明創(chuàng)新能力的體現,關鍵在于職務發(fā)明制度是平衡單位和發(fā)明人、設計人利益的保障,是優(yōu)化社會智力資源分配的重要手段。建立完善的職務發(fā)明制度并非一朝一夕可以完成的,就目前的立法現狀來看,包含兩個步驟：第一個步驟是立法明晰產權,立法要確立職務發(fā)明與非職務發(fā)明的區(qū)別,重點明晰職務發(fā)明認定問題,為下一個步驟的開展奠定基礎；第二個步驟是對職務發(fā)明的獎勵立法,是立法保護職務發(fā)明人的智力成果以及予以激勵。 本文首先通過介紹獎勵在專利制度中的特殊地位,為職務發(fā)明獎勵的立法做理論和歷史鋪墊。專利制度的誕生可以說是一種激勵手段的常規(guī)化,一種特殊的獎勵,在立法后續(xù)的發(fā)展中,獎勵一直都是專利立法不可或缺的一個重要組成部分。在職務發(fā)明立法中,獎勵更是成為其立法的兩大核心內容之一。之后,本文試從知識產權立法目的、手段以及法理等角度出發(fā),論證職務發(fā)明獎勵立法的必要性、合理性,尋找職務發(fā)明獎勵立法的理論根源。在理論論證之后,本文具體介紹我國建國以來職務發(fā)明立法的歷史沿革,對比美、日、德等科技發(fā)達國家的職務發(fā)明立法和職務發(fā)明獎勵制度在這些國家的具體實踐情況,從而為我國職務發(fā)明立法完善提供一些理論和實踐依據。 最后,結合上述論證和法律材料,為我國完善職務發(fā)明獎勵立法提出一些建議。具體來說,我國職務發(fā)明獎勵權屬于知識產權范疇,因而具有財產和人身雙重屬性。因此,在研究職務發(fā)明獎勵立法時,尤其要結合人身權利的特征來具體分析獎勵立法的權力屬性、權利構成、權利獎勵程序以及救濟途徑等方面。文章最后還將結合我國家知識產權局2012年頒布的《職務發(fā)明條例草案》(征求意見稿)1的具體內容,為完善我國職務發(fā)明獎勵制度,激勵我國科技發(fā)明創(chuàng)新,提供一些不成熟的參考意見。
[Abstract]:At present, the growth of the world economy is rapidly changing into a knowledge-innovation-oriented development model, and intellectual property rights are increasingly becoming the main driving force of economic growth. In the major innovative countries in the world, the scientific and technological innovation capability with the core of job invention as the core is becoming more and more important. Intellectual property management ability has increasingly become the key factor to determine the national economic growth potential and comprehensive competitiveness. The key reason why the strength and weakness of duty invention can reflect the innovation ability of a country lies in the fact that the duty invention system is the guarantee of balancing the interests of the unit and the inventor and the designer, and is an important means to optimize the distribution of social intellectual resources. The establishment of a perfect system of job invention can not be completed overnight. In view of the current legislative situation, there are two steps: the first step is to legislate to clarify the property right, and the legislation should establish the difference between the official invention and the non-duty invention. It lays a foundation for the next step, the second step is the legislation to reward the job invention, which is to protect the intellectual achievements of the job inventor and to encourage them. This paper first introduces the special position of the award in the patent system, and lays the theoretical and historical foundation for the legislation of the duty invention award. The birth of patent system can be said to be a regular incentive means, a special reward, in the subsequent development of legislation, the award has been an indispensable part of patent legislation. In the legislation of duty invention, reward is one of the two core contents of the legislation. After that, this paper tries to demonstrate the necessity and rationality of the legislation on the award of job invention from the point of view of the purpose, means and legal principle of intellectual property right, and to find the theoretical root of the legislation of reward for duty invention. After theoretical argumentation, this paper specifically introduces the history and evolution of the post invention legislation since the founding of the people's Republic of China, and compares the practice of the duty invention legislation and the duty invention reward system in these countries in the developed countries such as the United States, Japan, Germany and other scientific and technological developed countries. So as to provide some theoretical and practical basis for the legislative perfection of duty invention in China. Finally, based on the above argumentation and legal materials, some suggestions are put forward for perfecting the legislation of duty invention award in our country. Concretely speaking, the right of reward for duty invention belongs to the category of intellectual property, so it has the dual attribute of property and person. Therefore, when studying the legislation of reward for invention of duty, it is necessary to analyze the power attribute, the constitution of right, the procedure of right reward and the way of relief of reward legislation, especially according to the characteristics of personal right. At the end of the article, the article will combine with the specific contents of the draft regulations on Job inventions promulgated by the State intellectual property Office in 2012 (draft No 1 for soliciting opinions), in order to perfect the reward system for job inventions in our country and encourage scientific and technological inventions and innovations in our country. Provide some immature advice.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 黃東東;李儀;;職務發(fā)明設計人報酬性質探析[J];法學雜志;2007年06期

2 楊晨;董瑩;;企業(yè)職務發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)新者的利益激勵機制研究[J];科技管理研究;2006年11期

3 易楊,楊為國;職務發(fā)明創(chuàng)造獎酬制度透析[J];科技進步與對策;2004年11期

4 霍應希;;略析專利與發(fā)明獎的關系[J];科學·經濟·社會;1992年02期

5 寧立志;鄔躍;;論高校知識產權法律規(guī)范的完善[J];西北師大學報(社會科學版);2012年04期

6 錢孟姍;日本《特許法》職務發(fā)明規(guī)定的討論與修改——對我國專利制度完善帶來的啟示[J];知識產權;2004年05期

7 劉向妹;劉群英;;職務發(fā)明報酬制度的國際比較及建議[J];知識產權;2006年02期

8 孫春燕;;職務發(fā)明制度的合理性——以經濟學為視角[J];知識產權;2012年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 谷慧智 張冬梅;[N];中國知識產權報;2006年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 楊麗娟;科技法歷史形態(tài)演化的哲學反思[D];東北大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 鄧宗禹;我國職務發(fā)明報酬制度研究[D];華中科技大學;2010年

2 王瑩;知識產權仲裁研究[D];對外經濟貿易大學;2003年

3 李夢娜;我國職務發(fā)明報酬問題研究[D];蘭州大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1865417