本文選題：跨境 + 版權(quán)侵權(quán)��； 參考：《河北法學(xué)》2017年11期

【摘要】：版權(quán)的地域性和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的無邊際性之間的矛盾日益突出。網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下跨境版權(quán)侵權(quán)的法律沖突問題值得學(xué)術(shù)界和實(shí)務(wù)界的高度關(guān)注。各國(guó)版權(quán)實(shí)體法的統(tǒng)一難以實(shí)現(xiàn),目前無法通過該路徑得以解決。有必要對(duì)于跨境網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)侵權(quán)建立一套特殊的沖突規(guī)范,減少多個(gè)準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的適用,從而在保護(hù)版權(quán)的同時(shí)保障網(wǎng)絡(luò)的互聯(lián)互通�！禔LI原則》與《CLIP原則》對(duì)于無所不在之侵權(quán)采取最密切聯(lián)系地法作為單一準(zhǔn)據(jù)法,并規(guī)定"回歸地域性"例外,該無所不在之侵權(quán)規(guī)則值得借鑒和完善,以增加法律的穩(wěn)定性和可預(yù)期性。緩解無所不在之侵權(quán)所引起的法律沖突問題還需要地域屏蔽技術(shù)的應(yīng)用加以輔助。目前我國(guó)相關(guān)立法并不完善,缺少針對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)領(lǐng)域知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)的規(guī)定,我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐對(duì)于相關(guān)問題的處理并不成熟。因此,我國(guó)亟需吸收國(guó)際上的成熟經(jīng)驗(yàn),以便于今后更好地迎接全球化給版權(quán)制度帶來的挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:The contradiction between the regional nature of copyright and the boundlessness of the Internet is increasingly prominent. The legal conflict of cross-border copyright infringement in the network environment is worthy of academic and practical attention. It is difficult to realize the unification of the copyright substantive law of various countries, and can not be solved by this way. It is necessary to establish a special set of conflicting norms for cross-border network copyright infringement, so as to reduce the application of multiple applicable laws. In order to protect the copyright and ensure the interconnection of the network, the "ALI principle" and the "CLIP principle" adopt the most closely related law as the single applicable law for the omnipresent infringement, and stipulate the exception of "returning to the regionality". The omnipresent tort rules are worthy of reference and perfection in order to increase the stability and predictability of the law. To alleviate the conflict of laws caused by omnipresent infringement, the application of regional shielding technology is also needed. At present, the relevant legislation of our country is not perfect, lack of the provisions for the infringement of intellectual property rights in the field of network, the judicial practice of our country is not mature to deal with the related problems. Therefore, our country urgently needs to absorb the international mature experience, in order to better meet the challenge of the copyright system brought by globalization in the future.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周安平;陳慶;;論中美版權(quán)侵權(quán)行為結(jié)構(gòu)的差異[J];大學(xué)出版;2006年01期

2 王薇;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)條件下的版權(quán)侵權(quán)之法律適用[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2006年08期

3 張志;國(guó)際法環(huán)境下版權(quán)侵權(quán)的民事責(zé)任[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年08期

4 叢立先;;論涉外網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)侵權(quán)案件的法律適用[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

5 邱潤(rùn)根;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)侵權(quán)的法律適用[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

6 韓洪今;;論ISP/ICP的版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2008年10期

7 藺耀昌,才鳳敏;法律沖突問題研究[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

8 常萬(wàn)春;;淺析法律沖突的概念[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2012年08期

9 董v，

本文編號(hào)：1806974