知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的入典問題研究
本文選題:知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) + 民法典; 參考:《中國政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:現(xiàn)今民法典的設(shè)計(jì)中所安排的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度份量過小。無論是理論還是立法實(shí)踐,我國民法典傳統(tǒng)都排斥知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法進(jìn)入。這一根源在于范式民法典物債二分結(jié)構(gòu)的巨大影響。范式民法典的這一財(cái)產(chǎn)觀符合范式民法典制定的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí),但其已經(jīng)無法對(duì)現(xiàn)在我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀做出完整有效的回應(yīng)。從現(xiàn)實(shí)看,范式民法典的物債二分結(jié)構(gòu)已經(jīng)無法適應(yīng)現(xiàn)在社會(huì)發(fā)展的需要,物的支配和無形財(cái)產(chǎn)的支配都是主體的人對(duì)客體的世界支配的方式。物債二分內(nèi)在邏輯不周延,無法完全應(yīng)對(duì)新興的社會(huì)關(guān)系。亟需革新建立新的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)統(tǒng)領(lǐng)物權(quán)及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)。我國民法體系下物權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)的背后是財(cái)產(chǎn)支配的結(jié)構(gòu)。采用霍菲爾德的權(quán)利分析理論,可以對(duì)物權(quán)和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)進(jìn)行實(shí)證的研究。通過對(duì)物權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)的拆解,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)物權(quán)的支配力來自于物理上的支配。物權(quán)效力體現(xiàn)了支配力如何展開。直接控制、獨(dú)占排他、獨(dú)立處分性、公示公信制度、基于支配力的請求權(quán)反映了物權(quán)后財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的邏輯。我國采用的范式民法典在物權(quán)之上留有了財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的空間。這個(gè)空間為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的入典留下了可能性。通過對(duì)著作權(quán)、專利權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)做同樣的實(shí)證研究,可以分析得到知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的支配結(jié)構(gòu)。不以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的對(duì)象認(rèn)識(shí)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),而是以實(shí)證的觀點(diǎn)看,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)所支配的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的實(shí)質(zhì)。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的支配結(jié)構(gòu)體現(xiàn)出無形支配、排他獨(dú)占、獨(dú)立處分性、公示公信和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)和物權(quán)在支配權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)具有一致性。物權(quán)和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)體現(xiàn)的支配結(jié)構(gòu)也即靜態(tài)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)。由于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)和物權(quán)在支配結(jié)構(gòu)上的一致,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有了入典的可行性。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)入典模式有納入式、糅合式和鏈接式之分。而無論哪個(gè)模式都沒有解決知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)個(gè)性與民法典共性的協(xié)調(diào)。第四條路徑在于,因?yàn)橹R(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與物權(quán)都具有統(tǒng)一的支配權(quán)邏輯,因此,在物權(quán)編之后設(shè)立知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)編,而在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)編中規(guī)定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)一般性以及體現(xiàn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的內(nèi)容。這樣的路徑在邏輯上即不破壞潘德克吞體系,又沒有湮滅知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的個(gè)性,是一個(gè)可取的方式。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)入典需要設(shè)立知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)編,作為有體財(cái)產(chǎn)支配之物權(quán)編的補(bǔ)充,F(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度在主體、公示公信制度、行使方式、保護(hù)方式上都有較為統(tǒng)一的規(guī)定。將上述可以規(guī)定在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)編中,搭建知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)編的條文。這樣的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)編將具有八章二十一條的結(jié)構(gòu),在這八章二十一條中,對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的客體對(duì)象、支配性本質(zhì)、基本原則、特殊主體、設(shè)立和消滅一般規(guī)則、公示公信制度、權(quán)利形式方法、保護(hù)規(guī)則、行政管理機(jī)構(gòu)及與其他知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)單行法的銜接做出相應(yīng)的規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property system in the design of civil code is too small. Whether in theory or legislative practice, the tradition of Chinese civil code excludes intellectual property law from entering. This root lies in the huge influence of the dual structure of material debt in the paradigm of the Civil Code. This view of property of the paradigm civil code accords with the social reality of the formulation of the paradigm civil code, but it has been unable to make a complete and effective response to the present economic development situation of our country. From the practical point of view, the dichotomy structure of the Paradigm Civil Code has been unable to meet the needs of the present social development. The domination of things and intangible property is the way in which the subject person dominates the world over the object. The internal logic of material debt is not comprehensive, and it can not completely deal with the emerging social relations. It is urgent to innovate and establish a new structure of property rights to dominate real and intellectual property. The structure of real right under the civil law system of our country is the structure of property domination. By using the theory of right analysis, we can make an empirical study on real right and intellectual property. By disassembling the structure of real right, we can find that the dominating power of real right comes from physical domination. The effect of real right reflects how to develop the dominating power. The system of direct control, exclusive domination, independent disposition and public information reflects the logic of property right after real right. The paradigm civil code of our country has left the space of property right above the real right. This space leaves the possibility for the entry of intellectual property law. By doing the same empirical research on copyright, patent and trademark, we can get the dominant structure of intellectual property. The economic interests dominated by intellectual property are the essence of intellectual property instead of the object of intellectual property. The dominant structure of intellectual property law embodies invisible domination, exclusive monopoly, independent disposition, public information and intellectual property right. Intellectual property and real right are consistent in the dominant power structure. The dominant structure of real right and intellectual property is also called static property right. Due to the consistency of intellectual property and real right in dominating structure, intellectual property has the feasibility of entering the code. Intellectual property rights into the model of integration, blending and linking. However, neither model has solved the coordination between the individuality of intellectual property and the commonality of civil code. The fourth path lies in: since both intellectual property rights and property rights have a unified logic of controlling power, the intellectual property rights section shall be established after the property rights section, And in the intellectual property rights in the general provisions of intellectual property rights and reflect the content of intellectual property rights. Such a path logically does not destroy the Pandecton system and does not obliterate the intellectual property personality, is a desirable way. Intellectual property rights in the book need to set up intellectual property rights as a supplement to the property rights. The current intellectual property system has more unified regulations on subject, public information system, exercise mode and protection way. The above may be stipulated in the intellectual property rights section, set up the provisions of intellectual property rights cataloguing. Such a series of intellectual property rights will have a structure of eight chapters, 21 articles, in which the object object, dominant nature, basic principle, special subject, establishment and elimination of general rules and the system of publicity and public trust of intellectual property rights, The form of right, the rules of protection, the administration and the connection with other intellectual property laws.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D923.4
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 司金虎;;質(zhì)疑物權(quán)的優(yōu)先效力[J];湖北教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期
2 張安毅;;我國《物權(quán)法》的物權(quán)定義評(píng)析——物權(quán)的排他性考察[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期
3 康紀(jì)田;;論物權(quán)自然化發(fā)展向社會(huì)化轉(zhuǎn)變[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2007年22期
4 嚴(yán)永;;《中華人民共和國物權(quán)法》知識(shí)問答(2) 如何正確理解物權(quán)平等保護(hù)的原則[J];湖南農(nóng)業(yè);2008年02期
5 康紀(jì)田;;公平與效率統(tǒng)一視角下的物權(quán)社會(huì)化[J];北方法學(xué);2008年01期
6 康紀(jì)田;;試論反物權(quán)壟斷的制度變遷[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2008年04期
7 康紀(jì)田;;物權(quán)社會(huì)化是從源頭預(yù)防腐敗的重點(diǎn)[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年05期
8 黃俊輝;;論我國的物權(quán)觀念[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年06期
9 曾佳蓉;;物權(quán)優(yōu)先效力之否定[J];十堰職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期
10 趙建新;;淺析物權(quán)與債權(quán)的區(qū)分與融合[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2013年09期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 應(yīng)松年;;行政權(quán)與物權(quán)之關(guān)系研究——以《物權(quán)法》文本為分析對(duì)象[A];財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)與行政法保護(hù)——中國法學(xué)會(huì)行政法學(xué)研究會(huì)2007年年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年
2 康紀(jì)田;;論效率與公平在初次分配中的兩度統(tǒng)一——以對(duì)物權(quán)法學(xué)的研究為切入口[A];2009年度(第七屆)中國法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)論壇論文集[C];2009年
3 王誦科;;論物業(yè)管理的性質(zhì)——兼評(píng)海南自力投資有限公司訴海南華鑫物業(yè)管理有限公司案[A];中國律師2000年大會(huì)論文精選(上卷)[C];2000年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 尹飛;明確物權(quán)的對(duì)世性意義巨大[N];檢察日報(bào);2005年
2 王曉輝;淺談物權(quán)與債權(quán)的效力區(qū)別[N];吉林日報(bào);2007年
3 宋軍;現(xiàn)代產(chǎn)權(quán)的核心是物權(quán)[N];陜西日報(bào);2004年
4 吳s搴蚊窠,
本文編號(hào):1796066
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1796066.html