本文選題：OLI理論 + 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)��； 參考：《集美大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在開放經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境下,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度對外商直接投資的影響越來越大,如何利用外商直接投資一直是發(fā)展中國家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的一個重要戰(zhàn)略。本文首先在傳統(tǒng)國際生產(chǎn)折衷理論(OLI)框架下探討知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對FDI的影響,然后利用實(shí)證分析對理論分析進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn)。本文利用40個國家2003-2012年的面板數(shù)據(jù),選取WEF公布的《全球競爭力報(bào)告》報(bào)告中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的指標(biāo)作為本文核心解釋變量知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的實(shí)際指標(biāo),并且加入了五個控制變量一起進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,五個控制變量分別為:東道國的市場規(guī)模(GDP)、對外開放水平(OPEN)、勞動力成本(AVS)、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施(TCAR)、以及城市化水平(URB)。實(shí)證分析分為兩個層面:首先從整體層面上,不劃分FDI的具體行業(yè),并將樣本分為世界、發(fā)達(dá)國家以及發(fā)展中國家三組樣本分別進(jìn)行回歸,其次從行業(yè)層面上,分別對發(fā)達(dá)國家與發(fā)展中國家的十個具體行業(yè)進(jìn)行回歸分析比較。實(shí)證分析結(jié)果顯示:在整體層面上,在世界范圍內(nèi)、發(fā)達(dá)國家以及發(fā)展中國家三組樣本內(nèi),知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對于FDI有顯著的正影響;在行業(yè)層面上,具體行業(yè)有著不同的結(jié)果:電力、燃?xì)饧八纳a(chǎn)和供應(yīng)業(yè)、批發(fā)零售業(yè)、金融業(yè)、房地產(chǎn)業(yè)、租賃和商務(wù)服務(wù)業(yè),對比發(fā)達(dá)國家與發(fā)展中國家,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對FDI在1%、5%的不同程度水平下顯著為正,即為在這些行業(yè)內(nèi),增強(qiáng)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)有利于FDI的流入;對于農(nóng)、林、牧、漁業(yè)這一行業(yè)來說,發(fā)達(dá)國家的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對FDI在1%的水平下顯著為負(fù),發(fā)展中國家的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對FDI在1%的水平下顯著為正;對于采礦業(yè)、制造業(yè)、建筑業(yè)、住宿和餐飲業(yè)以及交通運(yùn)輸倉儲和郵政業(yè)來說,發(fā)達(dá)國家與發(fā)展中國家的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對FDI的影響均為正向的影響。最后本文根據(jù)實(shí)證結(jié)果,就發(fā)展中國家如何吸引外商直接投資提出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:In the open economy environment, the intensity of intellectual property protection has more and more influence on foreign direct investment (FDI). How to make use of FDI has always been an important strategy for the economic development of developing countries. This paper first discusses the impact of intellectual property protection on FDI under the framework of traditional international production compromise theory, and then uses empirical analysis to test the theoretical analysis. Based on the panel data of 40 countries from 2003 to 2012, this paper selects the intellectual property protection indicators in the Global Competitiveness report published by WEF as the real indicators for the intellectual property protection of the core explanatory variables in this paper. And five control variables are added to the empirical analysis. The five control variables are as follows: market size of host country, open level, labor cost and AVS, infrastructure, and urbanization level. The empirical analysis is divided into two levels: first of all, from the overall level, do not divide the specific industries of FDI, and divide the samples into the world, developed and developing countries for regression, and then from the industry level. Ten specific industries in developed and developing countries were analyzed by regression analysis. The results of empirical analysis show that intellectual property protection has a significant positive impact on FDI at the global level and in three groups of samples from developed and developing countries; at the industry level, intellectual property protection has a significant positive impact on FDI. Specific industries have different outcomes: electricity, gas and water production and supply, wholesale and retail, finance, real estate, leasing and business services, compared with developed and developing countries, Intellectual property rights are significantly positive for FDI at different levels of 1% or 5%, that is, in these industries, enhanced intellectual property protection is conducive to the inflow of FDI; for agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries, Intellectual property rights in developed countries are significantly negative for FDI at 1%, while those in developing countries are significantly positive at 1% of FDI; for mining, manufacturing, construction, The impact of intellectual property rights on FDI in both developed and developing countries is positive for accommodation and catering as well as transportation, storage and postal services. Finally, according to the empirical results, this paper puts forward corresponding policy recommendations on how to attract FDI in developing countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：集美大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F831.6;F204

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余長林;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)、模仿威脅與中國制造業(yè)出口[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動態(tài);2015年11期

2 代中強(qiáng);;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)提高了出口技術(shù)復(fù)雜度嗎?——來自中國省際層面的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2014年12期

3 王平;田彬彬;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對中國FDI質(zhì)量的影響——基于行業(yè)層面的實(shí)證分析[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年09期

4 代中強(qiáng);;實(shí)際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)、內(nèi)部化優(yōu)勢與FDI流入[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年04期

5 余長林;王瑞芳;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)、東道國特征與外商直接投資:一個跨國的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年10期

6 代中強(qiáng);梁俊偉;王中華;;內(nèi)生知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度變遷:來自中國的經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年02期

7 許春明;;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與FDI關(guān)系的實(shí)證分析[J];科技與法律;2009年01期

8 李輝;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與我國利用外資的相關(guān)性分析[J];國際商務(wù)(對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2008年02期

9 朱竹穎;;中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與FDI關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[J];中國科技信息;2008年06期

10 黃靜波;孫曉琴;;最優(yōu)關(guān)稅、專利保護(hù)期和FDI——基于產(chǎn)品生命周期理論的模型拓展與實(shí)證分析[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 柒江藝;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對外商直接投資的影響研究[D];中南大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1795672