本文選題：大眾創(chuàng)業(yè) + 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)�。� 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展和社會(huì)的進(jìn)步,在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)陷入低迷之時(shí),我國政府因勢(shì)而動(dòng),因時(shí)而變,順勢(shì)而為,提出“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)、萬眾創(chuàng)新”重要舉措,為我國經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展注入新的生機(jī)和活力。然而,在創(chuàng)業(yè)創(chuàng)新的浪潮中,對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)認(rèn)識(shí)不足、重視不夠、利用不到位等問題頻頻出現(xiàn),嚴(yán)重地打擊了全社會(huì)創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)的積極性。本文主要通過文獻(xiàn)綜述法和比較法,歸納總結(jié)了國內(nèi)外有關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策、大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)的研究以及發(fā)展的最新動(dòng)態(tài),為本文的寫作提供了理論依據(jù)和技術(shù)支撐。將我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策與美日韓等國家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策發(fā)展的主要經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行比較,同時(shí)結(jié)合我國發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,梳理和歸納了我國現(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策存在的主要問題,并合理地提出了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策創(chuàng)新的對(duì)策。文章首先對(duì)大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)的時(shí)代背景、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)關(guān)系、大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的要求進(jìn)行分析;其次對(duì)“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)”背景下知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策創(chuàng)新進(jìn)行了國內(nèi)外綜述與述評(píng);第三章分析了我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的現(xiàn)狀,包括建設(shè)歷史、建設(shè)內(nèi)容、主要特征等;第四章重點(diǎn)分析了在大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)背景下現(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的局限及障礙,局限主要表現(xiàn)為現(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策與大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)不相適應(yīng),并從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策建構(gòu)、創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)主體目標(biāo)、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)意識(shí)、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策的服務(wù)體系、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)運(yùn)行目標(biāo)等方面對(duì)限制性原因進(jìn)行分析;第五章對(duì)美、日、韓現(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策現(xiàn)狀、問題以及對(duì)我國的啟示等方面進(jìn)行闡述;第六章結(jié)合上述研究現(xiàn)狀、存在的問題和經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出了“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)”背景下知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策創(chuàng)新研究的對(duì)策,主要為積極鼓勵(lì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造政策、促進(jìn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)化政策、加大知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策資金支持、強(qiáng)化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策人才支持、配套實(shí)施相關(guān)公共政策、提升服務(wù)體系,完善創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)路徑等知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策等。通過本文的研究,可以更好地利用供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)性改革,充分利用科技創(chuàng)新,依靠創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)的政策,加快推動(dòng)建設(shè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國,推動(dòng)實(shí)施創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略和支撐激勵(lì)大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)、萬眾創(chuàng)新。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the progress of society, when the global economy is in the doldrums, our government moves because of the situation, changes from time to time, adapts to the trend, and puts forward the important measure of "mass entrepreneurship, innovation for all". We will inject new vitality and vitality into our country's economic and social development. However, in the wave of entrepreneurial innovation, the lack of knowledge of intellectual property protection, insufficient attention, inadequate utilization and other problems frequently appear, which seriously hit the enthusiasm of innovation and entrepreneurship in the whole society. Through literature review and comparative method, this paper summarizes the domestic and foreign intellectual property policy, research and development of the latest trends of entrepreneurship, which provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the writing of this paper. Comparing our intellectual property policy with the main experiences of the development of the intellectual property policy of the United States, Japan and South Korea, and combining the current development situation of our country, this paper summarizes the main problems existing in the current intellectual property policy of our country. And put forward the countermeasure of innovation of intellectual property policy reasonably. First of all, the article analyzes the background of mass entrepreneurship, the relationship between intellectual property and mass entrepreneurship, and the requirements of mass entrepreneurship on intellectual property policy. The third chapter analyzes the current situation of intellectual property policy in China, including the history of construction, the content of construction, the main characteristics and so on. The fourth chapter focuses on the analysis of the limitations and obstacles of the current intellectual property policy in the context of mass entrepreneurship. The limitations mainly show that the current intellectual property policy does not adapt to the mass entrepreneurship, and constructs the intellectual property policy and innovates the main objective of entrepreneurship. The consciousness of intellectual property protection, the service system of intellectual property policy, the operation target of intellectual property, and so on, are analyzed to the restrictive reasons. Chapter five deals with the current situation of intellectual property policy in the United States, Japan and South Korea. The sixth chapter puts forward the countermeasures of intellectual property policy innovation research under the background of "mass entrepreneurship", combining with the above research status, existing problems and experiences, and so on. The main purposes are to actively encourage intellectual property rights to create policies, promote intellectual property industrialization policies, increase financial support for intellectual property policies, strengthen intellectual property policy personnel support, implement related public policies, and upgrade the service system. We will improve intellectual property policies such as the path of innovation and entrepreneurship. Through the research of this paper, we can make better use of supply-side structural reform, make full use of scientific and technological innovation, rely on innovation-driven policies, and accelerate the construction of intellectual property power. Promote the implementation of innovation-driven development strategy and support to encourage mass entrepreneurship, innovation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F204

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟麗;;促進(jìn)自主創(chuàng)新能力建設(shè)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策探析[J];黑龍江科技信息;2016年30期

2 瞿曉理;;“大眾創(chuàng)業(yè),萬眾創(chuàng)新”時(shí)代背景下我國創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)人才政策分析[J];科技管理研究;2016年17期

3 吳迪;;大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)對(duì)技術(shù)進(jìn)步的影響研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2016年08期

4 宋河發(fā);沙開清;劉峰;;創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)發(fā)展與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國建設(shè)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策體系研究[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年02期

5 張亞峰;劉海波;;支持中小企業(yè)發(fā)展的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策對(duì)比與借鑒[J];中國軟科學(xué);2015年09期

6 夏恩君;宋劍鋒;;開放式創(chuàng)新研究的演化路徑和熱點(diǎn)領(lǐng)域分析——基于科學(xué)知識(shí)圖譜視角[J];科研管理;2015年07期

7 陳希;殷倩倩;;“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”與我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];湖北省社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

8 馮潔;侯非;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化建設(shè)策略研究[J];中國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2015年01期

9 劉雪鳳;高興;;促進(jìn)我國自主創(chuàng)新能力建設(shè)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)政策體系研究[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2014年03期

10 王重鳴;薛元昊;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)業(yè)能力的理論構(gòu)建與實(shí)證分析:基于高技術(shù)企業(yè)的多案例研究[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版)預(yù)印本;2014年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 趙亞靜;我國中小企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)建設(shè)政策體系研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2012年

2 金明浩;高校科技創(chuàng)新中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟奇勛;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度變遷中的私權(quán)與公權(quán)關(guān)系研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1789432