本文選題：發(fā)明專利的創(chuàng)造性 + 本領(lǐng)域技術(shù)人員　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：一個(gè)國(guó)家的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的發(fā)展水平是衡量一個(gè)國(guó)家科技發(fā)展水平的重要體現(xiàn)。發(fā)明專利作為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的重要組成部分,提高發(fā)明專利的授權(quán)質(zhì)量,是解決我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域目前為止所存在的“專利數(shù)量大,但專利質(zhì)量低”的問題的有效途徑。在發(fā)明專利的實(shí)質(zhì)審查中,新穎性和實(shí)用性是客觀判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),對(duì)于專利從業(yè)人員是較為容易把握的,而創(chuàng)造性則具有很強(qiáng)的主觀性,因此,把握了發(fā)明專利的創(chuàng)造性判斷,就能夠提高發(fā)明專利的授權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。首先,通過案例分析的方法,介紹發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性制度的發(fā)展及其判斷方法,不僅包括我國(guó)發(fā)明專利的創(chuàng)造性制度的發(fā)展沿革,還從美國(guó)、歐洲、日本等國(guó)的角度,以發(fā)明專利的創(chuàng)造性在世界范圍內(nèi)的起源及發(fā)展過程,來達(dá)到充分理解該制度的重要性和必然性,同時(shí)能夠?qū)徱暟l(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性判斷這一制度在歷史發(fā)展過程中的可取之處。其次,對(duì)于典型的案例,以“案例-小結(jié)-案例評(píng)析”的形式,從“本領(lǐng)域技術(shù)人員”、“現(xiàn)有技術(shù)”、“區(qū)別技術(shù)特征”、“非顯而易見性”、“顯著的進(jìn)步”這五個(gè)因素對(duì)發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性判斷過程中存在的問題進(jìn)行了剖析,生動(dòng)易懂地闡述了以上各要素在創(chuàng)造性判斷中的重要作用、以及實(shí)際工作過程中所存在的問題等,從而提出各方面的建議,以完善我國(guó)發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性的判斷現(xiàn)狀。最后,針對(duì)典型案例所呈現(xiàn)的問題,對(duì)我國(guó)發(fā)明專利的創(chuàng)造性判斷相應(yīng)地提出完善建議,得出最終結(jié)論。主要包括以下內(nèi)容:完善發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性判斷的主體條件,例如定期更新本領(lǐng)域技術(shù)人員的知識(shí)和能力的定義,立法明確規(guī)定本領(lǐng)域技術(shù)人員的創(chuàng)造力,加大專利復(fù)合型人才的培養(yǎng)力度;與“區(qū)別技術(shù)特征”相結(jié)合、重視“解決的技術(shù)問題”的應(yīng)用;保證申請(qǐng)時(shí)提出的現(xiàn)有技術(shù)和技術(shù)問題的準(zhǔn)確性;發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性判斷過程中使用的概念和術(shù)語應(yīng)當(dāng)明確化;定期發(fā)布發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性判斷的指導(dǎo)案例。通過上述案例分析和完善建議,期望能夠提高我國(guó)發(fā)明專利的授權(quán)水平,改善我國(guó)目前專利質(zhì)量不高的現(xiàn)狀。
[Abstract]:The development level of intellectual property right of a country is an important embodiment of measuring the level of science and technology development of a country.As an important part of the field of intellectual property rights, it is an effective way to improve the quality of patent authorization in the field of intellectual property rights in our country. So far, the problem of "large number of patents but low quality of patents" in the field of intellectual property rights in China is solved.In the examination of the essence of invention patent, novelty and practicability are objective judgment standards, which are easy to grasp for patent practitioners, while creativity is very subjective. Therefore, it grasps the creative judgment of invention patent.It can improve the licensing standards of invention patents.First of all, through the method of case analysis, this paper introduces the development of the creative system of invention patent and its judgment method, including not only the development and evolution of the creative system of invention patent in China, but also from the perspective of the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries.In order to fully understand the importance and inevitability of the invention patent creativity in the world, we can fully understand the importance and inevitability of the system, and at the same time, we can examine the merit of this system in the process of historical development.Secondly, for typical cases, in the form of "case-summary-case analysis", from "technical personnel in the field", "existing technology", "distinguishing technical characteristics", "non-obvious",The five factors of "remarkable progress" have analyzed the problems existing in the process of the creative judgment of invention patent, and vividly and easily explained the important role of the above factors in the creative judgment.And the existing problems in the process of practical work, so as to put forward suggestions in various aspects, in order to improve the status quo of the judgement of invention patent creativity in China.Finally, in view of the problems presented in typical cases, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the creative judgment of Chinese invention patent and draws the final conclusion.It mainly includes the following contents: perfecting the subject condition of the creative judgment of invention patent, for example, regularly updating the definition of the knowledge and ability of the technical personnel in this field, and legislating explicitly the creativity of the technical personnel in the field.Strengthen the training of patent compound talents, combine with "distinguishing technical characteristics", attach importance to the application of "solved technical problems", ensure the accuracy of existing technology and technical problems when applying for the patent;The concepts and terms used in the creative judgment of invention patent should be clearly defined, and the guiding cases of the creative judgment of invention patent should be published regularly.Through the analysis of the above cases and the perfect suggestions, it is expected that the licensing level of the invention patent in China can be improved, and the present situation of the patent quality is not high in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G306

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 易玲;魏小棟;;多維度視角下的“本領(lǐng)域技術(shù)人員”之界定[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年07期

2 馬文霞;何煒;李新芝;盧陽;鄒凱;黃海波;;“預(yù)料不到的技術(shù)效果”在創(chuàng)造性判斷中的考量[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2013年02期

3 劉曉軍;;專利創(chuàng)造性評(píng)判中的技術(shù)啟示[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年05期

4 石必勝;;本領(lǐng)域技術(shù)人員的比較研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年03期

5 涂赤楓;劉文霞;;本領(lǐng)域的技術(shù)人員能否具備創(chuàng)造能力——從中、歐、美、日專利局關(guān)于“本領(lǐng)域的技術(shù)人員”的定義說起[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2011年12期

6 朱雪忠;漆蘇;;美國(guó)專利改革法案內(nèi)容及其影響評(píng)析[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 石必勝;專利創(chuàng)造性判斷比較研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 胡彪;我國(guó)發(fā)明專利創(chuàng)造性判斷影響要素研究[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2014年

2 趙佑斌;發(fā)明專利的創(chuàng)造性判斷案例研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2010年

3 方慧聰;專利創(chuàng)造性判斷的客觀化之比較研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1738277