本文選題：商業(yè)秘密　切入點：商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：從1992年開始，商業(yè)秘密糾紛案件的數(shù)量不斷攀升，商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)逐漸成為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的重要組成部分。與西方相比，我國商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)制度還處于起步階段，許多制度尚待加強(qiáng)研究和深化，而且學(xué)界和實務(wù)界對如何加強(qiáng)理論研究和司法實踐的結(jié)合問題涉及者不是很多。目前，我國還沒有獨(dú)立的商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)法，其中《反不正當(dāng)競爭法》為商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的主要法律規(guī)范，有關(guān)商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)的規(guī)定大多數(shù)零星散布于相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)中，這些規(guī)定不能適應(yīng)復(fù)雜多變的經(jīng)濟(jì)生活的需要，因此，進(jìn)一步研究商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)理論和實踐之間的有機(jī)結(jié)合就顯得十分必要。 本文從研究商業(yè)秘密糾紛案件入手，針對商業(yè)秘密糾紛案件中涉及到的民事保護(hù)問題進(jìn)行分析總結(jié)。第一部分介紹研究現(xiàn)狀，研究目的和研究方法。第二部分是研究我國商業(yè)秘密民事法律保護(hù)基本框架，包括現(xiàn)行的商業(yè)秘密相關(guān)法律法規(guī)，商業(yè)秘密獲得救濟(jì)的途徑以及具體的商業(yè)秘密民事救濟(jì)手段這三個方面的內(nèi)容。第三部分通過研讀分析大量商業(yè)秘密糾紛案例，描述我國司法實踐中商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)在商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)范圍、商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)認(rèn)定和舉證責(zé)任、商業(yè)秘密損害賠償?shù)确矫娴那闆r。第四部分在實證分析結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)司法實踐中商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)在商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)范圍、商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)認(rèn)定和舉證責(zé)任、商業(yè)秘密損害賠償?shù)确矫娲嬖诘膯栴}，并對我國商業(yè)秘密民事保護(hù)體系存在的問題提出對策。 本文認(rèn)為，，為了社會主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)更好更快的發(fā)展，為了加速我國經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化進(jìn)程，適應(yīng)全球經(jīng)濟(jì)大環(huán)境，我國應(yīng)當(dāng)對目前商業(yè)秘密的法律保護(hù)體系進(jìn)行完善，對不明確的地方加以明確，對空白的部分加以填充。
[Abstract]:Since 1992, the number of trade secret disputes has been increasing, and the protection of trade secrets has gradually become an important part of intellectual property protection.Compared with the western countries, China's trade secret protection system is still in its infancy, and many systems need to be studied and deepened. Moreover, there are not many scholars involved in how to strengthen the combination of theoretical research and judicial practice.At present, there is no independent trade secret protection law in China. The Anti-unfair Competition Law is the main legal norm for the protection of trade secrets. Most of the regulations on the protection of trade secrets are scattered in the relevant laws and regulations.These regulations can not meet the needs of complex and changeable economic life. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the organic combination of trade secret protection theory and practice.Starting with the study of trade secret dispute cases, this paper analyzes and summarizes the civil protection problems involved in trade secret disputes cases.The first part introduces the research status, research purposes and research methods.The second part is to study the basic framework of the civil legal protection of trade secrets in China, including the current trade secrets related laws and regulations, trade secrets to obtain relief, as well as the specific commercial secrets of the three aspects of civil remedies.The third part through reading and analyzing a large number of trade secret disputes, describes the protection of trade secrets in the scope of trade secret protection, trade secret infringement identification and burden of proof, trade secret damage compensation and so on.The fourth part summarizes the problems of commercial secret protection in judicial practice, including the scope of trade secret protection, the identification of trade secret infringement and the burden of proof, and the damage compensation of trade secret, based on the results of empirical analysis.And put forward the countermeasures to the problems existing in the civil protection system of our country's trade secret.In order to develop the socialist market economy better and faster, to speed up the process of economic globalization and adapt to the global economic environment, our country should perfect the current legal protection system of trade secrets.Make clear what is not clear and fill in the blank.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.294;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王茂林;科技企業(yè)發(fā)展與商業(yè)秘密的法律保護(hù)[J];甘肅科技;2004年12期

2 張海燕;彭湃;;論商業(yè)秘密及侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];今日湖北(理論版);2007年03期

3 董浩潔;羅寶華;;對我國商業(yè)秘密法律保護(hù)問題的再認(rèn)識[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2008年10期

4 龍文懋;李元;;從“接觸加相似”到“不可避免披露”——從一得閣案看中國商業(yè)秘密侵權(quán)證明原則的進(jìn)展[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年06期

5 李駿;;侵犯技術(shù)秘密犯罪案件的損失計算方式[J];人民司法;2012年14期

6 姚歡慶;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)行為歸責(zé)原則研究[J];浙江社會科學(xué);2001年04期

本文編號：1720733