本文選題：知識產權　切入點：海關保護　出處：《安徽大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識產權海關保護(又稱知識產權邊境保護)是我國知識產權行政保護的一種,在依法治國和國際接軌的背景下,知識產權海關保護法律制度的建設有著重要的意義。 目前,西方各發(fā)達國家都將知識產權海關保護放在極為重要的地位,相應的法律法規(guī)日臻完善、知識產權執(zhí)法體制日趨高效,各國海關的執(zhí)法力度也在不斷加大,知識產權海關保護同樣已經成為我國海關一項不可替代的重要非傳統(tǒng)職能。其在抑制侵權貿易、維護公平貿易秩序、贏取我國和平發(fā)展外部環(huán)境方面發(fā)揮了重要的作用。 經過這十幾年的迅速發(fā)展,我國在知識產權海關保護法律制度建設方面已經取得巨大的進步,基本的制度框架已然構建,但是在如何結合現(xiàn)實發(fā)展的需求和執(zhí)法實踐作進一步的完善,仍需理論研究者和實踐工作者去不斷的探索、思考。作為在海關知識產權保護中居于基礎性地位“知識產權海關備案保護”,雖然已經在借鑒各國經驗后形成了較為完備的備案制度體系,但是隨著經濟社會的不斷向前發(fā)展,在執(zhí)法實踐中仍存在諸多的問題。 如在知識產權海關保護中仍然存在的較為明顯的重實體輕程序現(xiàn)象,還是可以發(fā)現(xiàn)相關法條對備案等的實體內容規(guī)定較為明確,有確定的內容及金額,但對于有關程序的規(guī)定就較為模糊。法律程序是落實實體法律的手段,但是程序規(guī)定相對薄弱也制約了實體內容的功效,其實如前所述,我國知識產權海關保護包含備案制度在內的部分內容已經較為超前,但是海關的相關程序規(guī)定還應進行進一步規(guī)范。 在本文中,筆者正是以知識產權海關保護的備案制度為切入點展開細致的思考與分析,對備案制度的歷史、現(xiàn)狀以及國外備案制度進行研究,同時特別關注執(zhí)法細節(jié),關注在備案環(huán)節(jié)上規(guī)定較為模糊的部分,研究如何進一步完善梳理流程,制定硬性操作模式,減少自由裁量權,提升效率。以從中概括總結出對我國知識產權海關保護備案制度的改進意見,從而從更高的層面推動我國知識產權海關保護法律制度的建設。 筆者提出應首先應綜合平衡兩種備案模式借鑒歐盟海關“被動”申請,“主動”查處的備案模式和執(zhí)法形式,即采用依申請為主,結合依職權,并以權利人為核心的方式。其次提出知識產權海關保護程序無論以何種方式啟動,權利人只應提供與貨值等價的擔保。再有就是對專利權實施特殊的有限保護模式。并將此歸納為“主動監(jiān)測、被動保護”的特殊專利權海關保護模式。積極探討現(xiàn)行備案制度存在的不足和需要改進之處。 此外筆者還結合海關實際業(yè)務工作,提出在備案環(huán)節(jié)引入較為新穎的海關企業(yè)風險管理的備案制度運作方式,利用海關自身優(yōu)勢,蘊知識產權保護工作于海關的日常企業(yè)管理工作中。最后還提出進出口貨物保護應區(qū)別對待。以此在備案環(huán)節(jié)應對權利人濫用權利的情況,使權利人權利和義務更趨一致。
[Abstract]:Customs protection of intellectual property (also known as intellectual property border protection) is one of the administrative protection of intellectual property in China. Under the background of rule by law and international integration, the construction of the legal system of Customs Protection of intellectual property is of great significance.
At present, the developed countries of the western customs protection of intellectual property on a very important position, the corresponding laws and regulations continue to improve the enforcement of intellectual property rights system is more and more efficient, national customs enforcement is also increasing, the Customs Protection of intellectual property rights has also become China's customs an irreplaceable important non-traditional functions. Its inhibition in infringing trade, maintain fair trade order, play an important role to the external environment of China's peaceful development.
After ten years of rapid development, China has made great progress in the construction of legal system of Customs Protection of intellectual property rights, the basic institutional framework is already built, but in how to combine the real development needs and further improve the law enforcement practice, still need theory researchers and practice workers to continually explore, thinking. As the Customs Protection of intellectual property in the basic position of "intellectual property protection of the Customs for the record", has been drawing on the experience of other countries to form a more complete filing system system, but with the continuous economic and social development, there are still many problems in the practice of law enforcement.
If you still exist in the Customs Protection of intellectual property rights in the obvious entity lightprogram phenomenon, can still be found in the relevant law of filing entity content more clearly defined, determine the content and the amount, but for the provisions of the program moreblurred. The legal procedure is a means to implement the substantive laws, but the program the provisions are relatively weak but also restricted the effectiveness of the entity content, in fact, as mentioned earlier, the Customs Protection of intellectual property rights in China contains part of the filing system is more advanced, but the customs related procedures should also be further standardized.
In this paper, the author is thinking and detailed analysis to the filing system of Customs Protection of intellectual property rights as the starting point, to record the history of the system, research status quo and foreign filing system, paying particular attention to the law enforcement details, concerned about the provisions vague in part of the record, to study how to further improve the combing process, develop rigid mode of operation, reduce discretion, enhance efficiency. In order to summarize suggestions for improvement of China Customs Protection of intellectual property rights record system, so as to promote the construction of our country's customs protection of intellectual property rights legal system from a higher level.
The author should first comprehensive balance two record model from the EU customs "passive" application, "active" and the record mode and forms of law enforcement, according to application, combined with the authority, and the right to human centered way. Secondly, the program of Customs Protection of intellectual property rights started regardless of the manner in which human rights only should be equivalent to the value of guarantees. There is the implementation of the patent protection mode Limited special. And this summed up as "active monitoring, passive protection" special patent protection mode of customs. Actively explore the shortcomings of the existing filing system and needs to be improved.
In addition, the author also combined with the actual business of the customs work, introduced the risk management of new enterprises in the customs filing link filing system mode of operation, the customs of their own advantages, the protection of intellectual property rights in the enterprise management in the daily work of the customs. We also put forward the protection of import and export goods should be treated differently. In this part of the record deal with the rights of people the abuse of rights, the rights of people more consistent with the rights and obligations.

【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 劉翼;;知識產權海關保護中權利濫用行為的規(guī)制[J];安徽科技;2006年09期

2 房軍;;關于海關知識產權犯罪管轄權問題的思考[J];遼寧警專學報;2008年06期

3 劉菊堂;;知識產權海關保護的兩種模式分析[J];青島遠洋船員學院學報;2007年01期

4 符騰丹;;我國海關知識產權保護制度探析[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2008年17期

5 朱國華;倪天伶;;韓國知識產權戰(zhàn)略與經濟發(fā)展探析[J];中國高�？萍寂c產業(yè)化;2008年11期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 董自然;關于新形勢下知識產權海關保護的法律思考[D];蘇州大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1713128