發(fā)布時間：2018-03-30 20:35

  本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：海關(guān)保護(hù)　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著中國加入世界貿(mào)易組織(WTO)，承諾履行《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》后，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)工作不斷深入。作為國際進(jìn)出口活動和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)工作中的重要組成部分，，海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的作用在不斷提高。我國海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)采用的是“依職權(quán)”與“依請求”相結(jié)合的保護(hù)模式。2008年6月5日，為提升我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造、運(yùn)用、保護(hù)和管理能力，建設(shè)創(chuàng)新型國家，實(shí)現(xiàn)全面建設(shè)小康社會目標(biāo)，我國制定并頒布了《國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略綱要》。 經(jīng)過改革開放以來的多年發(fā)展，我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)體系日趨健全，呈現(xiàn)幾大特點(diǎn)：一是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)擁有量快速增長；二是市場主體運(yùn)用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)能力逐步提高；三是執(zhí)法水平不斷提高，經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和社會效益日益顯現(xiàn)；四是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的國際影響力逐漸增強(qiáng)，國際交往日益增多。但同時也存在不足：一是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度仍不完善；二是自主知識產(chǎn)權(quán)水平和擁有量尚不能滿足經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展需要；三是社會公眾知識產(chǎn)權(quán)意識仍較薄弱，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為時有發(fā)生，侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)現(xiàn)象還比較突出；四是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)支撐體系和人才隊伍建設(shè)滯后。 海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)是新時代賦予海關(guān)的新興職能，海關(guān)在打擊知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)力度較大，而在立法以及實(shí)踐層面對在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)方式和手段方面給予必要的約制，以避免在海關(guān)進(jìn)出境環(huán)節(jié)占有相對優(yōu)勢的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利人憑借其享有的優(yōu)勢排斥競爭對手，同時維護(hù)權(quán)利人的根本利益。本文試圖通過對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利人權(quán)利運(yùn)用不當(dāng)?shù)姆治鏊伎�，引出海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)工作中反壟斷的問題，并在考慮現(xiàn)行海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的基礎(chǔ)上，提出對權(quán)利人約制的制度建議，以期能對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)特別是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的海關(guān)保護(hù)工作有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its commitment to implement the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (trips), IPR protection has continued to deepen.As an important part of the international import and export activities and the protection of intellectual property rights, the role of customs intellectual property protection is constantly improving.On June 5, 2008, in order to promote the creation, application, protection and management of intellectual property rights in China, we built an innovative country.To achieve the goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way, China has formulated and promulgated the outline of the National intellectual property Strategy.After years of reform and opening up, China's intellectual property related laws and regulations system is becoming more and more perfect, showing several characteristics: first, the rapid growth of intellectual property rights, second, the ability of the market main body to use intellectual property rights is gradually improved;Third, the level of law enforcement continues to improve, economic and social benefits are increasingly apparent; fourth, the international influence in the field of intellectual property rights is gradually strengthened, and international exchanges are increasing day by day.But at the same time, there are also shortcomings: first, the intellectual property system is still imperfect; second, the level and ownership of independent intellectual property rights are not yet able to meet the needs of economic and social development; and third, the awareness of intellectual property rights of the public is still relatively weak.The abuse of intellectual property rights occurs from time to time, and the phenomenon of infringing intellectual property rights is still prominent; fourth, the service supporting system of intellectual property rights and the construction of talent ranks lag behind.The protection of intellectual property rights of customs is a new function entrusted to customs in the new era. Customs has a great effort to combat intellectual property rights infringement, and in the aspect of legislation and practice, it gives necessary restrictions on the ways and means of protecting intellectual property rights.In order to avoid the relative advantage in the entry and exit of customs, the holders of intellectual property rights exclude their competitors by virtue of the advantages they enjoy, and at the same time safeguard the fundamental interests of the right holders.This paper tries to draw the question of antimonopoly in the work of customs intellectual property right by analyzing and pondering the improper application of the rights of the holders of intellectual property rights, and on the basis of considering the current system of protection of customs intellectual property rights.This paper puts forward some suggestions on the system of binding to the obligee in order to benefit the customs protection of intellectual property especially intellectual property in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈國兵;劉佳;;TRIPS協(xié)定下中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平和實(shí)際保護(hù)強(qiáng)度[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年11期

2 賀敏;專利法中利益平衡的法理學(xué)思考[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年02期

3 聶毅,黃建華;美國、歐盟知識產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)制度簡介[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年04期

4 吳漢東;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的平衡精神與平衡理論——馮曉青教授《知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法利益平衡理論》評析[J];法商研究;2007年05期

5 王先林;;從微軟壟斷案看知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷控制[J];法學(xué)家;2001年03期

6 葉茂標(biāo);;簡論我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)所面臨的執(zhí)法風(fēng)險[J];法制與社會;2009年32期

7 劉嘉靈;;淺論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的海關(guān)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會;2010年01期

8 夏天奇;;淺析我國海關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)中備案與申請并行制度之缺陷[J];法制與社會;2010年14期

9 張深山;;淺議網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律保護(hù)問題及對策[J];法制與社會;2011年21期

10 鐘建華;美國有關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境保護(hù)的法律規(guī)定[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;1994年04期

本文編號：1687581