發(fā)布時間：2018-03-29 10:17

  本文選題：民事訴訟　切入點：專家輔助人　出處：《西北師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著科學技術的不斷發(fā)展，在現(xiàn)代訴訟中涉及越來越多的專業(yè)問題，這些專業(yè)問題一直以來都是由鑒定人進行鑒定并給出鑒定意見，如醫(yī)療事故的糾紛、知識產(chǎn)權案件、產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量案件等。由于法官和當事人對專門性案件都缺少相應的專業(yè)知識，故無法對鑒定意見進行審查和認定。在各種各樣的專業(yè)問題面前，，法官只是法律人而不是科學家，不可能對各個領域的知識都能加以識別和認定，面對專業(yè)性很強的問題，法官難以應對。但是，基于法官不能拒絕裁判也不能隨意裁判的原則，為了解決和待證事實有關的專業(yè)性問題，需要求助于各行各業(yè)的專家，通過他們的幫助，使法官作出正確的判決。同時也是為了維護當事人合法的訴訟權益，實現(xiàn)對鑒定意見的有效質(zhì)證。 2012年新修改的《民事訴訟法》規(guī)定：“當事人可以申請人民法院通知有專門知識的人出庭，就鑒定人作出的鑒定意見或者專業(yè)問題提出意見。”理論界將這里所說的“具有專門知識的人”稱為“專家輔助人”。但是專家輔助人制度在我國實際司法實踐中的運用卻很少。從法官的角度來看，由于立法上缺乏相關配套規(guī)定，故在審判過程中專家輔助人制度的適用無所是從。因此，有必要對我國專家輔助人制度進行完善。本文對專家輔助人制度的完善主要以民事訴訟為視角。文章共分為四部分： 第一部分是對專家輔助人制度的概述。該部分首先介紹我國專家輔助人制度的立法背景及立法原因，其次介紹我國專家輔助人制度的概念，及與其他相關概念的辨析，最后綜述我國確立并完善專家輔助人制度的意義。 第二部分是對我國專家輔助人制度的現(xiàn)狀及存在問題的進行分析。通過對專家輔助人在我國民事訴訟司法實踐中運行情況的分析，總結(jié)了專家輔助人制度設立后存在的主要問題。為第三部分的我國專家輔助人制度的完善提供參考思路。 第三部分是對完善我國專家輔助人制度的構(gòu)想。通過第二章對專家輔助人制度在我國的現(xiàn)狀和存在問題的分析，對專家輔助人的資格、權利義務、訴訟地位、專家意見的效力、以及專家輔助人的選任和監(jiān)管機制等方面進行了探析，為我國民事訴訟中專家輔助人制度的完善提供一些思路。 第四部分是針對我國在專家輔助人制度尚不完善的情況下，結(jié)合我國專家輔助人制度在實際運用中可能會出現(xiàn)的問題提出自己的建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, more and more professional problems are involved in modern litigation. These professional problems are always appraised by experts, such as medical malpractice disputes, intellectual property cases, Product quality cases and so on. Because judges and parties lack the corresponding professional knowledge of specialized cases, they cannot examine and determine the appraisal opinions. In the face of various professional issues, judges are only legal people, not scientists. It is impossible to identify and recognize knowledge in all fields, and it is difficult for a judge to cope with a very professional problem. However, on the basis of the principle that judges cannot refuse or decide at will, In order to solve the professional problems related to the facts to be proved, we need to turn to experts in various professions, through their help, to enable the judge to make the correct judgment. At the same time, it is also to safeguard the legitimate litigant rights and interests of the parties. To realize the effective cross-examination of the appraisal opinion. The newly amended "Civil procedure Law" in 2012 stipulates that "the parties may apply to the people's court to notify a person with expertise to appear in court," Put forward opinions on the expert opinions or professional questions. "the theorists refer to the" persons with specialized knowledge "as" expert auxiliaries ". But the system of expert auxiliaries in the actual judicial practice of our country. From the judge's point of view, Due to the lack of relevant supporting provisions in the legislation, the application of the expert assistant system in the course of the trial is not applicable. It is necessary to perfect the system of expert auxiliaries in our country. In this paper, the perfection of the system of expert auxiliaries is mainly from the perspective of civil litigation. The article is divided into four parts:. The first part is an overview of the expert Auxiliary system. This part first introduces the legislative background and legislative reasons of the expert Auxiliary system in China, and then introduces the concept of the expert Auxiliary system in China, and the discrimination between the system and other related concepts. Finally, the significance of establishing and perfecting the expert assistant system in China is summarized. The second part is the analysis of the current situation and existing problems of the expert assistant system in our country, through the analysis of the operation of the expert assistant in the judicial practice of civil litigation in our country. This paper summarizes the main problems existing after the establishment of the expert assistant system, and provides reference ideas for the improvement of the expert assistant person system in our country in the third part. The third part is to perfect our country expert assistant person system conception, through the second chapter to the expert assistant person system in our country present situation and the existence question analysis, to the expert auxiliary person's qualification, the right duty, the lawsuit status, The effectiveness of the expert opinion, the selection and supervision mechanism of the expert assistant are analyzed, which provides some ideas for the perfection of the expert assistant system in the civil litigation in our country. The fourth part is aimed at our country in our country in the expert assistant person system is not perfect, unifies our country expert assistant person system in the actual application may appear the question to put forward own suggestion.
【學位授予單位】：西北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐繼軍,謝文哲;英美法系專家證人制度弊端評析[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2004年03期

2 陳志興;黃友鋒;;簡析意大利國家的“技術顧問”制度[J];長春理工大學學報(社會科學版);2010年01期

3 張海濱;論我國民事訴訟中的專家輔助人制度[J];長沙電力學院學報(社會科學版);2003年01期

4 齊樹潔;洪秀娟;;英國專家證人制度改革的啟示與借鑒[J];中國司法;2006年05期

5 陳斌;王路;;論我國刑事訴訟中的專家輔助人及其制度構(gòu)建[J];湖北社會科學;2011年01期

6 肖承海;;論鑒定結(jié)論質(zhì)證的路徑依賴[J];證據(jù)科學;2008年02期

7 王葆蒔;;論我國涉外審判中“專家意見”制度的完善[J];法學評論;2009年06期

8 胡震遠;;我國專家證人制度的建構(gòu)[J];法學;2007年08期

9 姜麗娜;羅大華;應柳華;;英美專家證人制度評析及對我國的啟示[J];西部法學評論;2008年03期

10 王剛;略論我國民事訴訟中的專家輔助人[J];河北科技大學學報(社會科學版);2003年03期

本文編號：1680692