本文選題：開源軟件許可證　切入點(diǎn)：GPL許可證　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從人類社會邁入信息時代以來,計算機(jī)產(chǎn)業(yè)一直都是我國信息產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的重中之重。衡量一個國家計算機(jī)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的優(yōu)劣,往往要看其中的軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的如何。當(dāng)代中國,計算機(jī)已經(jīng)滲透到生活工作的許多方面,而計算機(jī)軟件,更是最大程度上是的人們的生活與學(xué)習(xí)變得更加快捷、方便。離開計算機(jī)軟件,可謂是寸步難行。全球各國的法律制度對計算機(jī)軟件都有相應(yīng)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度予以保護(hù),這雖然起到了很好保護(hù)軟件開發(fā)者正當(dāng)權(quán)利的作用,但同時也產(chǎn)生了一系列諸如軟件生產(chǎn)商壟斷,軟件價格過高,更新速度慢,難以發(fā)現(xiàn)軟件的漏洞缺陷逐漸凸顯出來。開源軟件的出現(xiàn)恰好解決了壟斷性商業(yè)軟件所帶來的一系列負(fù)面影響。舉個耳熟能詳?shù)睦?安卓手機(jī)現(xiàn)在在我國的手機(jī)市場份額已經(jīng)超越了老對手蘋果手機(jī),他的操作系統(tǒng)正是以最有名的開源軟件Linux為基礎(chǔ)研發(fā)而成的。開源軟件意義主要在于源代碼對普通大眾也是可見的,這代表了計算機(jī)工作者對智慧成果共享的追求。然而,開源軟件并不能拋棄市場談發(fā)展,所以開源軟件在與市場結(jié)合時,往往會比傳統(tǒng)的商業(yè)軟件遭遇更多的法律風(fēng)險。為了避免可能的法律糾紛,現(xiàn)階段的開源軟件開發(fā)者的做法通常是在發(fā)布一款開源軟件時,附帶開源軟件許可證來規(guī)定軟件用戶的權(quán)利、義務(wù)以及相關(guān)使用范圍,這樣才能將開源軟件更恰當(dāng)?shù)呐c法律制度相融合。但如何能將開源軟件合理合法的置于我國法律制度當(dāng)中,正是本文想要探索的問題,同時,我國軟件行業(yè)也可借此開源運(yùn)動的興起,找到更好的行業(yè)突破口。本文正文分為五個部分:第一部分介紹開源軟件與開源軟件許可證的相關(guān)概念。第二部分,以開源軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)為研究重點(diǎn),深入分析在現(xiàn)有著作權(quán)法、專利權(quán)法以及商標(biāo)法框架下開源軟件所要面對的問題和如何利用現(xiàn)有知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度進(jìn)行自我保護(hù),同時還對一些典型案例進(jìn)行了分析。第三部分針對開源軟件許可證問題詳細(xì)分析其性質(zhì)及保護(hù)機(jī)制,并針對法律糾紛案例中所涉及的焦點(diǎn)法律問題進(jìn)行分析。第四部分在分析我國發(fā)展開源軟件必要性的基礎(chǔ)上提出了幾點(diǎn)設(shè)想與建議。第五部分總結(jié)全文問并對其價值前景作出預(yù)測。
[Abstract]:Since the human society entered the information age, the computer industry has always been the most important part of the development of our country's information industry. To measure the advantages and disadvantages of a country's computer industry development, we often need to see how the software industry develops. Computers have permeated many aspects of life and work, and computer software, to the greatest extent, has become faster and more convenient for people to live and study. The legal systems of various countries around the world have a corresponding intellectual property legal system to protect computer software, although this has played a very good role in protecting the legitimate rights of software developers. But at the same time, there are also a series of software manufacturers monopoly, software prices are too high, the pace of renewal is slow, Vulnerabilities in software that are hard to find are becoming more and more obvious. The emergence of open source software just solves a series of negative effects of monopoly commercial software. Android phones now have a bigger market share in China than their old rivals, Apple. His operating system was developed on the basis of the most famous open source software, Linux. The significance of open source software is that the source code is also visible to the general public, which represents the computer workers' pursuit of sharing the fruits of wisdom. Open source software can not abandon the market talk about development, so when open source software is combined with the market, it often encounters more legal risks than traditional commercial software. In order to avoid possible legal disputes, At this stage, the practice of open source software developers is usually to include an open source software license to define the rights, obligations and scope of use of software users when releasing an open source software. Only in this way can open source software be more appropriately integrated with the legal system. However, how to put open source software in the legal system of our country reasonably and legally is exactly the problem this paper wants to explore, at the same time, This paper is divided into five parts: the first part introduces the concepts of open source software and open source software license. Focusing on the intellectual property protection of open source software, this paper analyzes in depth the problems faced by open source software under the framework of existing copyright law, patent law and trademark law, and how to use the existing intellectual property system to protect itself. At the same time, some typical cases are analyzed. The third part analyzes the nature and protection mechanism of open source software license in detail. In the fourth part, on the basis of analyzing the necessity of developing open source software in our country, some tentative ideas and suggestions are put forward. The fifth part summarizes the full text and puts forward some suggestions. Value prospects are predicted.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 閆曄;李超;;基于開源軟件開發(fā)專有軟件的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];重慶理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué));2013年07期

2 蔡楠;;對開源軟件著作權(quán)歸屬的思考[J];知識經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年20期

3 劉建臣;林戈;;開源軟件商業(yè)化中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險及應(yīng)對[J];法制與社會;2011年34期

4 吳卓修;;從“綠壩”抄襲事件談開源軟件的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會;2011年06期

5 王希貝;;Android開源手機(jī)與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)淺析[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2010年11期

6 巫曉倩;夏蕓;;我國基礎(chǔ)軟件發(fā)展中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年07期

7 曲柳鶯;;開源軟件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題分析[J];信息技術(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2009年06期

8 林枋;;開源軟件的許可證淺析[J];科技廣場;2009年05期

9 熊瑞萍;萬江平;;開源軟件的突圍之路——關(guān)于開源運(yùn)動的若干思考[J];科技管理研究;2009年03期

10 孫夢詩;王穎;;開放共享與版權(quán)制度變革[J];沈陽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 張學(xué)琦;;移動互聯(lián)網(wǎng)：開源軟件的又一個春天[N];中國電子報;2009年

2 田夢;;中科紅旗:開源的野心[N];計算機(jī)世界;2009年

，

本文編號：1673157