本文選題：著作權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓　切入點：著作權(quán)善意取得　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：著作權(quán)作為一種典型的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，其權(quán)利客體是智力成果，具有非物質(zhì)性的特點。作品權(quán)利人對其只能虛擬占有，正是因為著作權(quán)不能像動產(chǎn)所有權(quán)那樣以占有的方式進(jìn)行公示，權(quán)利歸屬和權(quán)利狀態(tài)缺乏為外界所知的表征，容易在轉(zhuǎn)讓中出現(xiàn)著作權(quán)重復(fù)轉(zhuǎn)讓或重復(fù)授權(quán)問題，即著作權(quán)“一權(quán)多賣”或善意取得問題。因?qū)嵺`中著作權(quán)存在無權(quán)處分的可能性，為了維護(hù)著作權(quán)交易安全，實現(xiàn)民法上的誠實信用和信賴保護(hù)，著作權(quán)適用善意取得制度是很有必要的。由于對著作權(quán)基于準(zhǔn)占有的公信力所產(chǎn)生的信賴?yán)鎽?yīng)予以保護(hù)，并且國外不少國家承認(rèn)著作權(quán)的善意取得制度，在我國的法律框架下也可以借鑒物權(quán)的善意取得制度，我國司法實踐中不乏適用著作權(quán)善意取得制度解決實際糾紛的案例，因此著作權(quán)善意取得制度在我國是具有可行性的。為了構(gòu)建著作權(quán)善意取得制度，在著作權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓的模式選擇上，理論界的爭論集中在登記對抗主義模式和登記生效主義兩種模式上。著作權(quán)權(quán)利變動宜采取登記對抗主義模式，即著作權(quán)的權(quán)利轉(zhuǎn)讓，交易雙方應(yīng)當(dāng)簽訂書面合同，應(yīng)將著作權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同送至著作權(quán)管理機(jī)關(guān)進(jìn)行登記。轉(zhuǎn)讓合同未經(jīng)登記的，不得對抗善意第三人。登記對抗主義體現(xiàn)了適度管理精神，平衡了維護(hù)交易安全與尊重著作權(quán)人隱私，符合著作權(quán)法的保護(hù)精神。同時可以節(jié)約成本，，促進(jìn)著作權(quán)交易繁榮。構(gòu)成著作權(quán)善意取得，必須符合出讓人無處分權(quán)、著作權(quán)交易行為具有有償性、受讓人出于善意、完成登記這四個要件。善意第三人取得著作權(quán)一旦構(gòu)成了善意取得，善意第三人取得該著作權(quán)的相應(yīng)權(quán)利，該權(quán)利上原本存在的權(quán)利趨于消滅；原權(quán)利人有權(quán)向無權(quán)處分人請求賠償因其無權(quán)處分而造成的損失。
[Abstract]:As a kind of typical intellectual property, the object of copyright is intellectual achievement, which has the characteristics of immateriality. It is precisely because copyright can not be publicized in the way of possession like the ownership of movable property, the ownership of rights and the state of rights are not well known to the outside world, so it is easy to have the problem of duplicate transfer or repeated authorization of copyright in the transfer. Because of the possibility of unauthorized disposition of copyright in practice, in order to safeguard the safety of copyright transaction and realize the protection of good faith and trust in civil law, It is necessary for copyright to apply the system of bona fide acquisition. Since the trust interests arising from the credibility of copyright based on quasi-possession should be protected, and many foreign countries recognize the system of bona fide acquisition of copyright, Under the legal framework of our country, we can also draw lessons from the bona fide acquisition system of real right. In our judicial practice, there are many cases in which the bona fide acquisition system of copyright is applied to solve the actual disputes. Therefore, the system of bona fide acquisition of copyright is feasible in China. In order to construct the system of bona fide acquisition of copyright, the mode of copyright transfer is chosen. The controversy in the theoretical circle focuses on the two modes of registration antagonism and registration effectivism. The mode of registration antagonism should be adopted in the change of copyright rights, that is, the transfer of copyright rights, and the parties to the transaction should sign a written contract. The copyright transfer contract shall be sent to the copyright administration authority for registration. If the transfer contract is not registered, it shall not be against a bona fide third party. Registration antagonism embodies the spirit of moderate management. It balances the maintenance of transaction security and respect for the privacy of copyright owners, and conforms to the spirit of protection of copyright law. At the same time, it can save costs and promote the prosperity of copyright transactions. The act of copyright transaction is paid, and the transferee completes the registration of the four elements out of good faith. Once the bona fide third party acquires the copyright in good faith, the bona fide third party acquires the corresponding right of the copyright. The original right holder has the right to claim compensation for the loss caused by the unauthorized disposition.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 何煥鋒;;著作權(quán)公示制度探析[J];山東社會科學(xué);2009年11期

2 譚浩;;論動產(chǎn)善意取得制度[J];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年S2期

3 張冬梅;;著作權(quán)重復(fù)移轉(zhuǎn)糾紛案件審理中的疑難問題[J];人民司法;2009年09期

本文編號：1647821