發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-10 23:22

  本文選題：著作權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：著作權(quán)法　出處：《中原工學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：著作權(quán)是指基于文學(xué)、藝術(shù)和科學(xué)作品依法產(chǎn)生的權(quán)利。著作權(quán)屬于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的范疇,是一種民事權(quán)利,包括著作人身權(quán)和著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)兩個(gè)方面。正是因?yàn)橹鳈?quán)的財(cái)產(chǎn)屬性,其能夠?yàn)槭褂萌藥硪欢ǖ慕?jīng)濟(jì)利益,也就產(chǎn)生了侵犯著作權(quán)的違法、甚或是犯罪的現(xiàn)象。侵犯著作權(quán)的犯罪不等于侵犯著作權(quán)罪,它指的是系列犯罪的統(tǒng)稱。當(dāng)前,隨著知識經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值的進(jìn)一步凸顯,社會(huì)實(shí)踐中侵犯著作權(quán)的犯罪數(shù)量急劇增加且有蔓延之勢,從犯罪主體來看,個(gè)體犯罪不再是主流,團(tuán)伙犯罪、集團(tuán)犯罪占據(jù)了主導(dǎo)地位;從犯罪手段來看,利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)進(jìn)行犯罪的現(xiàn)象增多。這些犯罪已經(jīng)嚴(yán)重侵犯了著作權(quán)人應(yīng)有的合法權(quán)益、損害了國家對著作權(quán)的正常管理秩序和社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序的合理發(fā)展,削弱了社會(huì)主體著作權(quán)創(chuàng)作的積極性,阻礙了我國知識經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康、快速發(fā)展,也影響了我國的國際聲譽(yù)。當(dāng)然,侵犯著作權(quán)的犯罪的滋生也充分反映了我國刑事法律制度和刑事司法實(shí)踐活動(dòng)在規(guī)范和打擊侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪方面仍然存在不足,也充分反映了加強(qiáng)相關(guān)法制建設(shè)和進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)刑事司法保護(hù)的必要性。著作權(quán)的刑事司法保護(hù)就是通過刑事司法機(jī)關(guān)的刑事偵查、公訴、刑事審判和刑罰執(zhí)行活動(dòng)實(shí)現(xiàn)對著作權(quán)的保護(hù)。進(jìn)行著作權(quán)刑事司法保護(hù)是完善和補(bǔ)充我國著作權(quán)刑事法律制度的需要、是打擊和預(yù)防侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪行為的需要、是維護(hù)著作權(quán)利人合法權(quán)益的需要、是保證市場經(jīng)濟(jì)健康發(fā)展的需要。但是,當(dāng)前我國著作權(quán)刑事司法保護(hù)仍然存在著一定問題和挑戰(zhàn),著作權(quán)刑事司法保護(hù)存在著固有的缺陷,如人員不足、專業(yè)素養(yǎng)不強(qiáng)、機(jī)構(gòu)建設(shè)不健全、存在懶政和貪污腐敗的現(xiàn)象;侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的罪與非罪的司法認(rèn)定存在難點(diǎn)、侵犯著作權(quán)罪與他罪的關(guān)系處理存在爭議;行政執(zhí)法與刑事司法的銜接存在問題;刑事司法中的裁判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)存在問題;網(wǎng)絡(luò)版權(quán)犯罪行為的法律適用和使用新技術(shù)手段對版權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的入罪都存在問題;侵犯著作權(quán)的犯罪出現(xiàn)了新情況。這些都嚴(yán)重影響了刑事司法機(jī)關(guān)的辦案成效,影響了對侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的有效打擊和預(yù)防,必須予以完善。完善著作權(quán)刑事司法保護(hù),首先是要完善著作權(quán)的刑事法律制度體系;要解決司法機(jī)關(guān)中的痼疾,提高著作權(quán)刑事司法保護(hù)的效率和水平;要嚴(yán)格按照刑法總則中的刑法基本原則、犯罪的定義和構(gòu)成刑法分則中的明文規(guī)定,準(zhǔn)確處理侵犯著作權(quán)罪中罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的認(rèn)定;實(shí)現(xiàn)著作權(quán)刑事救濟(jì)與民事救濟(jì)高效搭配;實(shí)現(xiàn)著作權(quán)行政執(zhí)法和刑事司法的無縫銜接;要勇于刺破新技術(shù)的面紗;要注重公訴與自訴的有機(jī)結(jié)合;要注意處理好個(gè)人利益與社會(huì)利益、強(qiáng)保護(hù)與弱保護(hù)的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Copyright is a kind of civil right which is based on the law of literature, art and science. It belongs to the category of intellectual property, and it includes the personal right of the author and the property right of the work. It is precisely because of the property attribute of the copyright that the copyright belongs to the category of intellectual property. It can bring certain economic benefits to the user, and it will result in the violation of copyright, or even the phenomenon of crime. The crime of infringing upon copyright is not equal to the crime of infringing on copyright. It refers to the general name of a series of crimes. At present, With the further highlight of the value of knowledge economy, the number of copyright infringement crimes in social practice has increased sharply and spread. From the point of view of the main body of crime, individual crime is no longer the mainstream, gang crime, group crime occupies a dominant position; From the point of view of criminal means, the phenomenon of using the network to commit crimes has increased. These crimes have seriously violated the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners. It has damaged the normal management order of the state copyright and the rational development of the socialist market economic order, weakened the enthusiasm of the copyright creation of the social subject, and hindered the healthy and rapid development of the knowledge economy in our country. It also affects our country's international reputation. Of course, the breeding of crimes against copyright also fully reflects the inadequacy of our criminal legal system and criminal judicial practice in standardizing and cracking down on copyright infringement crimes. It also fully reflects the necessity of strengthening the construction of relevant legal systems and further strengthening the protection of criminal justice. The criminal judicial protection of copyright is through criminal investigation and public prosecution by criminal judicial organs. Criminal trial and penalty enforcement activities to achieve the protection of copyright. Criminal judicial protection of copyright is the need to perfect and supplement the criminal legal system of copyright in our country, and the need to combat and prevent criminal acts against copyright. It is the need to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright holders and to ensure the healthy development of the market economy. However, there are still some problems and challenges in the criminal judicial protection of copyright in our country. There are inherent defects in criminal judicial protection of copyright, such as insufficient personnel, weak professional accomplishment, imperfect institution construction, lazy administration and corruption, difficulties in judicial determination of crime and non-crime of infringing copyright, There are disputes on the relationship between copyright infringement and other crimes, problems in the connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, problems in the standard of adjudication in criminal justice; There are problems in the legal application of network copyright crimes and in the criminalization of copyright infringement by using new technological means. New situations have emerged in copyright infringement crimes. These have seriously affected the effectiveness of criminal justice organs in handling cases. It is necessary to perfect the criminal judicial protection of copyright, first of all, to perfect the criminal legal system of copyright, to solve the chronic malady in judicial organs, Improving the efficiency and level of criminal judicial protection of copyright, strictly following the basic principles of criminal law in the general provisions of the criminal law, the definition of crime and the explicit provisions in the specific provisions of the constitution of the criminal law, and accurately handling the crime and non-crime in the crime of infringing upon copyright, The identification of this crime and that crime, the realization of the efficient combination of criminal remedy and civil remedy of copyright, the seamless connection of administrative law enforcement of copyright and criminal judicature, the courage to break through the veil of new technology, the emphasis on the organic combination of public prosecution and private prosecution; Attention should be paid to the relationship between personal and social interests and between strong and weak protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中原工學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁晏婷;從“新搜案”看著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];軟件工程師;2002年04期

2 柳勵(lì)和;高校普及著作權(quán)知識的迫切性[J];株洲工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年S1期

3 翟霞;網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播與著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];理論學(xué)刊;2002年05期

4 余波;著作權(quán)保護(hù)的社會(huì)學(xué)考量[J];中國出版;2004年12期

5 王媛;;著作權(quán)保護(hù)問題淺析[J];中共鄭州市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

6 石瓶門;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展與著作權(quán)保護(hù)不能互為代價(jià)[J];中國信息界;2004年19期

7 劉靜玲;檔案與著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];蘭臺(tái)世界;2005年12期

8 香江波;對著作權(quán)的限制通常分為哪些種類[J];出版參考;2005年10期

9 韓蘇閩;;圖書館數(shù)字資源著作權(quán)的保護(hù)和使用[J];醫(yī)學(xué)信息;2006年03期

10 任玉翠;;數(shù)字圖書館數(shù)據(jù)庫著作權(quán)保護(hù)研究[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年11期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 張俊霞;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息著作權(quán)的刑法保護(hù)[A];中國犯罪學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)第十八屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集（下冊）[C];2009年

2 闞有清;;圖書館服務(wù)與著作權(quán)的合理使用[A];福建省圖書館學(xué)會(huì)2008年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

3 龐怡;楊紅春;;試論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下信息資源共建共享涉及的著作權(quán)保護(hù)問題[A];信息時(shí)代科技情報(bào)研究、科技期刊編輯學(xué)術(shù)論文集[C];2004年

4 侯翠香;;新環(huán)境下科技期刊的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[A];中國氣象學(xué)會(huì)2005年年會(huì)論文集[C];2005年

5 毛旭;;館藏文獻(xiàn)的著作權(quán)保護(hù)和歸屬[A];文化大省建設(shè)中的圖書館現(xiàn)代化——浙江省圖書館學(xué)會(huì)第八次學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2001年

6 曹越;;從想像到現(xiàn)實(shí)——中國情境下的著作權(quán)[A];全球信息化時(shí)代的華人傳播研究：力量匯聚與學(xué)術(shù)創(chuàng)新——2003中國傳播學(xué)論壇暨CAC/CCA中華傳播學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集（下冊）[C];2004年

7 吳淑金;李強(qiáng);陳兵;袁寧;杜冠輝;陳嘉偉;宋妮妮;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下學(xué)術(shù)期刊的著作權(quán)及其保護(hù)[A];“廣東科技情報(bào)服務(wù)促進(jìn)廣東經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展”綜合研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

8 鞏R，

本文編號：1595525