本文關(guān)鍵詞： 在先權(quán) 外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán) 權(quán)利沖突 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)　出處：《西南交通大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：培根說：“知識就是力量”。隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的進步和社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展,知識產(chǎn)品的種類如雨后春筍般日益增多。與此同時,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護范圍也逐漸擴大,其權(quán)屬爭議、合同糾紛、侵權(quán)形態(tài)越來越復(fù)雜,現(xiàn)代社會重視知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的意識也日益高漲。近年來,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突問題,已經(jīng)成為學(xué)術(shù)界和司法界普遍關(guān)注的問題。在現(xiàn)今開放的市場經(jīng)濟體制下,“搭便車”現(xiàn)象不時出現(xiàn),如某些不法企業(yè)或經(jīng)營者一改往日假冒他人注冊商標(biāo)、專利以及他人企業(yè)名稱等一般的假冒做法,而是想方設(shè)法鉆法律的漏洞。這種行為往往是侵權(quán)行為人對已有一定知名度或者核心競爭力的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)客體,仿冒其智力成果的核心部分或全部,并且經(jīng)過一定的行政程序,改頭換面之后變成自己的知識成果而使其披上“合法”的外衣,從而對抗他人在先取得的合法權(quán)利,也有學(xué)者將其稱之為“特殊仿冒行為”。在專利領(lǐng)域,尤其是外觀設(shè)計專利日益凸顯的商業(yè)價值,與其相關(guān)的權(quán)利沖突近年來也大量增多。 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在先權(quán)指的是特定權(quán)利人在其原權(quán)利即在先權(quán)利受到侵害或有受到侵害的現(xiàn)實危險時,基于法律的直接規(guī)定而享有的以此來保護個人利益的權(quán)利。如何合理平衡專利權(quán)人與在先權(quán)利人之間的合法權(quán)益,如何有效處理和解決雙方的權(quán)利沖突便成了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)立法、執(zhí)法與司法層面的最具現(xiàn)實性的焦點問題。為此,本文首先從在先權(quán)的研究背景和意義入手,總結(jié)、分析了國內(nèi)外對在先權(quán)制度的研究現(xiàn)狀。接下來,本文對在先權(quán)制度理論進行了系統(tǒng)性的整理研究,主要闡述了在先權(quán)的概念界定、法律特征及其與相關(guān)法律術(shù)語的比較分析等諸多內(nèi)容。本文第三部分基于我國對外觀設(shè)計專利的保護,著重分析了外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)與在先權(quán)利沖突的產(chǎn)生原因和具體類型,依次探討了外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)與在先注冊商標(biāo)權(quán)、在先著作權(quán)、在先知名商品特有的包裝或裝潢使用權(quán)、在先企業(yè)名稱權(quán)以及自然人的肖像權(quán)等權(quán)利沖突的類型。并在此基礎(chǔ)上,梳理了司法實踐中處理專利權(quán)與在先權(quán)利沖突的基本原則,進而提出了解決外觀設(shè)計專利與在先權(quán)利沖突的有效途徑,以期推動我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在先權(quán)制度的進一步完善和發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:"knowledge is power," Bacon said. "with the progress of science and technology and the development of social economy, the variety of knowledge products has been increasing. At the same time, the scope of intellectual property protection has gradually expanded and its ownership is controversial." Contract disputes, forms of infringement are becoming more and more complicated, and the awareness of intellectual property rights in modern society is also growing. In recent years, the conflict of intellectual property rights has become a problem. Under the open market economic system, the phenomenon of "free rider" appears from time to time, for example, some illegal enterprises or operators change to counterfeit other people's registered trademarks. Generic counterfeiting practices, such as patents and other business names, seek to exploit loopholes in the law. This behavior is often the object of intellectual property rights that the torter has already known or has core competence over. Imitating the core or all of their intellectual achievements, and after a certain administrative process, transforming them into their own intellectual achievements and putting them under the cloak of "legitimacy", thus counteracting the legitimate rights acquired by others in the first place, Some scholars also call it "special counterfeiting behavior". In the field of patent, especially the increasingly prominent commercial value of design patent, the conflict of rights related to it has also increased in recent years. The prior right of intellectual property refers to the specific right holder when his original right, that is, the prior right, is infringed or is in real danger of being infringed, How to reasonably balance the legitimate rights and interests between the patentee and the prior right holder, how to deal with and resolve the conflict of rights between the two sides effectively becomes the legislation of intellectual property right. Therefore, this paper begins with the background and significance of the research on the priori right, summarizes and analyzes the current research situation of the priori right system at home and abroad. This paper makes a systematic research on the theory of priori right, mainly expounds the definition of the concept of priori right. The third part of this paper, based on the protection of design patents in China, focuses on the causes and specific types of conflicts between design patents and prior rights. In turn, this paper discusses the types of conflicts between the patent right of design and the right to first register trademark, the prior copyright, the unique packaging or decoration right of the first well-known commodity, the right to the name of the prior enterprise and the portrait right of the natural person. This paper combs the basic principles of dealing with the conflict between patent right and prior right in judicial practice, and then puts forward an effective way to solve the conflict between design patent and prior right, in order to promote the further improvement and development of the system of intellectual property primacy in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉紅;基于衡平理念探析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突[J];中華商標(biāo);2004年07期

2 周詳;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突若干問題研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年07期

3 楊才然;;與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的權(quán)利沖突協(xié)調(diào)原則之理論基礎(chǔ)[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年11期

4 詹云燕;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在先權(quán)利的侵害與制止[J];福建論壇(經(jīng)濟社會版);1999年05期

5 李閣霞;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突探析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

6 靳曉東;;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突之立法對策[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年12期

7 郝鐵川;權(quán)利沖突:一個不成為問題的問題[J];法學(xué);2004年09期

8 郭洪波;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突成因與協(xié)調(diào)解決[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2008年11期

9 蘇敏;;外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)與著作權(quán)沖突原因淺析[J];法制與社會;2007年10期

10 李彥閣;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突典型案例與解析[J];法制與社會;2011年16期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 歐修平;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突與司法衡平[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

2 梁興國;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張曉欣;外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)與著作權(quán)沖突解決機制研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

2 張雙英;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的多元協(xié)調(diào)機制[D];河北大學(xué);2011年

3 謝彥杰;論我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在先權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建[D];河北大學(xué);2011年

4 雷方瓊;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2011年

5 許艷霞;商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先權(quán)沖突若干法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2001年

6 李曉慶;外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)與在先權(quán)的沖突問題研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2006年

7 單銘君;商標(biāo)權(quán)與在先權(quán)的權(quán)利沖突[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

8 文寧;在先權(quán)研究[D];中南大學(xué);2007年

9 鄭曦;商標(biāo)法上的在先權(quán)利制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

10 馮衛(wèi)敏;論與商標(biāo)權(quán)相沖突的在先權(quán)利[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1505772