本文關(guān)鍵詞： 知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì) 高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè) 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　出處：《武漢理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)是由高技術(shù)成果轉(zhuǎn)化形成的具有知識(shí)密集、RD投入高、附加價(jià)值高、技術(shù)進(jìn)步快等特征的先導(dǎo)型產(chǎn)業(yè)。21世紀(jì)隨著知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的興起，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在產(chǎn)業(yè)化發(fā)展中變的前所未有的重要，高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)由于具有高智力性和高效益性，使得其和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的聯(lián)系越來(lái)越緊密，為此以美、日為代表的發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家制定了促進(jìn)本國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略，以此促進(jìn)現(xiàn)代科學(xué)技術(shù)成果向社會(huì)生產(chǎn)和社會(huì)生活轉(zhuǎn)化，從而提高本國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。我國(guó)在發(fā)展高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)時(shí)同樣重視知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的作用，1999年國(guó)家科技部制定并頒布了《關(guān)于加速國(guó)家高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)發(fā)展的若干意見(jiàn)》，在該意見(jiàn)中明確指出，高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)作為國(guó)家的支柱性產(chǎn)業(yè)，必須要加大智力的投入，強(qiáng)化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)，自此拉開(kāi)了我國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展的序幕。 合肥作為安徽的省會(huì)城市，近年來(lái)在安徽省委的大力支持下，在以“科技興市、知識(shí)興市”的大背景下，合肥市高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)抓住機(jī)遇，迎頭趕上取得了重大的發(fā)展。然而在取得成績(jī)的同時(shí)，我們也應(yīng)看到合肥市高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展方面還存在著專利分布不均衡、自主知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)缺乏、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制系統(tǒng)不健全、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)中介服務(wù)體系整體功能還未形成、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信息公眾服務(wù)平臺(tái)建設(shè)滯后等問(wèn)題，因此如何將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)更好的融入到高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)，以此拉動(dòng)合肥經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展已成為新時(shí)期合肥市政府面臨的一大難題。 本文從合肥高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀和原因入手，并比較研究了美國(guó)加州、中國(guó)北京知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展模式，通過(guò)運(yùn)用問(wèn)卷調(diào)查、實(shí)證研究等方法，對(duì)合肥市高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)分析，，在總結(jié)有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)的同時(shí)，提出了一些具體的建議。首先是要加強(qiáng)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法規(guī)制度制定，為此必須做到健全高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)立法、完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)融資法規(guī)制度以及制定促進(jìn)專利技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)化法規(guī)制度；其次要優(yōu)化高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)配套制度，為此需做到強(qiáng)化人才保障制度、完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專利聯(lián)盟制度以及健全知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)中介服務(wù)組織制度；最后必須要完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度，為此須做到健全知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)權(quán)行政保護(hù)和司法保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:High-tech industry is a leading industry formed by the transformation of high-tech achievements with the characteristics of knowledge intensive R D with high investment high additional value and rapid technological progress with the rise of knowledge economy in the 21st century. Intellectual property has become more and more important in the development of industrialization. Because of its high intelligence and high efficiency, the relationship between intellectual property and intellectual property becomes more and more close. The developed countries represented by Japan have formulated the intellectual property strategy to promote the development of their high-tech industries, so as to promote the transformation of modern scientific and technological achievements into social production and social life. In order to improve the competitiveness of domestic high-tech industries, China also attaches importance to the role of intellectual property in the development of high-tech industries. In 1999, the Ministry of Science and Technology formulated and promulgated some opinions on speeding up the development of the National High-tech Industrial Development Zone, in which it was clearly pointed out that the high-tech industry is the pillar industry of the country. It is necessary to increase the investment of intelligence and strengthen the protection of intellectual property, which has since opened the prelude to the development of intellectual property of high and new technology industry in China. Hefei, as the capital city of Anhui Province, in recent years under the strong support of the Anhui Provincial Party Committee, under the background of "science and technology, knowledge to revitalize the city", Hefei high-tech industry seize the opportunity. Catching up with the great development, however, we should also see that there is imbalance in the distribution of patents and the lack of independent intellectual property rights in the development of intellectual property rights of high-tech industries in Hefei. The intellectual property risk control system is not perfect, the whole function of intellectual property intermediary service system has not been formed, and the construction of intellectual property information public service platform is lagging behind. Therefore, how to better integrate intellectual property rights into the high-tech industry, in order to stimulate the economic development of Hefei has become a major problem faced by the Hefei municipal government in the new period. This paper starts with the current situation and reasons of the development of intellectual property in Hefei high-tech industry, and compares the development patterns of intellectual property in California and Beijing of China. Through questionnaire survey and empirical research, this paper makes a comparative study on the development of intellectual property rights in Hefei high-tech industry. This paper makes a systematic analysis of the current situation of the development of intellectual property rights in Hefei's high-tech industry, and sums up beneficial experiences at the same time. This paper puts forward some concrete suggestions. Firstly, it is necessary to strengthen the establishment of the intellectual property laws and regulations of high-tech industries, so we must perfect the legislation of high-tech industrial development zones. Perfecting the legal system of intellectual property financing and establishing the legal system to promote the industrialization of patent technology; Secondly, it is necessary to optimize the supporting system of intellectual property of high-tech industry, so as to strengthen the talent protection system, perfect the intellectual property patent alliance system and perfect the intellectual property intermediary service organization system. Finally, we must perfect the system of intellectual property protection, so we must perfect the administrative protection and judicial protection of intellectual property rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F276.44;D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊振興;;淺論加強(qiáng)和完善高新技術(shù)企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];山西財(cái)政稅務(wù)�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

2 魏明;;國(guó)內(nèi)典型區(qū)域傳統(tǒng)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與啟示[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年14期

3 張斌,柯瑞清;試論我國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)高新技術(shù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

4 王玉璽;高山行;;我國(guó)企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)管理的現(xiàn)狀分析及建議[J];科技與法律;2008年03期

5 楊晨;夏鈺;施學(xué)哲;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群視角下高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)管理與服務(wù)模式探析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2012年10期

6 王冰;;提升高新技術(shù)企業(yè)的核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力——以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)為視角[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2008年16期

7 孫學(xué)立;;國(guó)家級(jí)高新技術(shù)開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)實(shí)施產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究——以山東省濟(jì)寧市為例[J];山東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

8 徐建華;;對(duì)我國(guó)高新技術(shù)企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的思考[J];山東省農(nóng)業(yè)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

9 張利華;陳鋼;李穎明;;基于系統(tǒng)失靈理論的區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新服務(wù)平臺(tái)研究[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2007年11期

10 任皓;李俊霞;;企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)方式的比較分析[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐俠;外商直接投資對(duì)中國(guó)高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新的影響研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1451287