近年來精神障礙和社會心理問題的患病率顯著增加。精神障礙患者是最脆弱的人群之一,他們的政治、經(jīng)濟、社會和文化權利經(jīng)常被忽視,在利用衛(wèi)生保健、保險、就業(yè)和住房方面也受到歧視。精神衛(wèi)生立法可以提高精神障礙患者的生活水平,可以為保護精神障礙患者的基本人權提供保障,還可以為精神障礙患者的社區(qū)融合,改善其獲得衛(wèi)生保健的機會,保護公民權利,以及住房、教育和就業(yè)等關鍵問題的解決提供法律框架。精神衛(wèi)生法成為促進精神障礙患者獲得精神保健服務,促進和保護其權利的有效工具。事實上,精神衛(wèi)生系統(tǒng)的建立是一個循序漸進的過程,盡管一些國家已經(jīng)建立了精神衛(wèi)生法,但是其精神衛(wèi)生體系仍然需要進一步完善。國家需要對精神衛(wèi)生立法不斷進行審查、修訂和修正,不斷提高其質(zhì)量。世界衛(wèi)生組織于2005年發(fā)布了一份關于精神衛(wèi)生立法的檢查清單,目的是為各國制定以人權為中心的精神衛(wèi)生法提供指導。這份清單不是一套絕對的規(guī)則,它有助于各國評估其精神衛(wèi)生立法是否已包括了關鍵組成部分,也有助于拉近各國精神衛(wèi)生立法與《世界人權宣言》之間的聯(lián)系。目的精神衛(wèi)生立法的目的是保護、促進和改善公民的生活和精神健康。制定精神衛(wèi)生法可以成為保護和促進人們獲得利用精... 

【文章來源】：吉林大學吉林省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：122 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
中文摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Background
    1.2 The prevalence of mental health disorder
    1.3 The importance of mental health legislation
    1.4 WHO?s checklist of mental health legislation
    1.5 China and Indonesia?s Mental Health Law
    1.6 Objectives and Significance of the Proposed Research
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods
    2.1 Literature study
    2.2 Expert interview
    2.3 Statistic analysis
Chapter 3 Results
    3.1 Overall comparison of the mental health law based on WHO checklistbetween China and Indonesia
    3.2 Comparison of the preamble and objective in mental health law basedon WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.3 Comparison of the definition in mental health law based on WHOchecklist between China and Indonesia
    3.4 Comparison of the access to mental health care in mental health lawbased on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.5 Comparison of the right of user of mental health service in mentalhealth law based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.6 Comparison of the right of families and other carers in mental healthlaw based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.7 Comparison of the competence, capacity and guardianship in mentalhealth law based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.8 Comparison of the voluntary admission and treatment in mental healthlaw based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.9 Comparing of the non-protesting patient in mental health law based onWHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.10 Comparison of the involuntary admission and involuntary treatment inmental health law based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.11 Comparison of the involuntary treatment in mental health law based onWHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.12 Comparison of the proxy consent for treatment in mental health lawbased on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.13 Comparison of the involuntary treatment in community service inmental health law based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.14 Comparison of the emergency criteria in mental health law based onWHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.15 Comparison of the determination of mental health disorder in mentalhealth law based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.16 Comparison of the special treatments in mental health law based onWHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.17 Comparison of the seclusion and restrain in mental health law basedon WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.18 Comparison of the clinical experimental research in mental health lawbased on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.19 Comparison of the oversight and review mechanism in mental healthlaw based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.20 Comparison of the police responsible in mental health law based onWHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.21 Comparison of the mentally ill offenders in mental health law based onWHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.22 Comparison of discrimination in mental health law based on WHOchecklist between China and Indonesia
    3.23 Comparison of the housing in mental health law based on WHOchecklist between China and Indonesia
    3.24 Comparison of the employment mental health law based on WHOchecklist between China and Indonesia
    3.25 Comparison of the social security in mental health law based on WHOchecklist between China and Indonesia
    3.26 Comparison of the civil issues in mental health law based on WHOchecklist between China and Indonesia
    3.27 Comparison of the protection of vulnerable groups in mental healthlaw based on WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
    3.28 Comparison of the offences and penalties in mental health law basedon WHO checklist between China and Indonesia
Chapter 4 Discussion
    4.1 Preamble and Objective
    4.2 Definition
    4.3 Access to mental health care
    4.4 Right of users of mental health service
    4.5 Right of families and other carers
    4.6 Competence, capacity and guardianship
    4.7 Voluntary admission
    4.8 Non-protesting patient
    4.9 Involuntary admission and involuntary treatment
    4.10 Involuntary treatment
    4.11 Proxy consent for treatment
    4.12 Involuntary treatment in community service
    4.13 Emergency criteria
    4.14 Determination of mental health disorder
    4.15 Special treatment
    4.16 Seclusion and restraint
    4.17 Clinical and experimental research
    4.18 Oversight and review mechanism
    4.19 Police responsibility
    4.20 Mentally ill offender
    4.21 Discrimination
    4.22 Housing
    4.23 Employment
    4.24 Social security
    4.25 Civil issues
    4.26 Protection of vulnerable groups
    4.27 Offence and penalties
Chapter 5 Conclusion
References
Appendix
Curriculum Vitae
Acknowledgement


【參考文獻】：
期刊論文
[1]Social Sciences in China[J].   China Economist. 2020(01)
[2]中國精神衛(wèi)生法中的康復問題(英文)[J]. José.M.BERTOLOTE.  上海精神醫(yī)學. 2013(01)
[3]中華人民共和國精神衛(wèi)生法(英文)[J]. 陳晗暉,費立鵬,程輝,陳瓊瓊,陳曉東,朱子龍,張銀娥,黃佳,畢曼麗.  上海精神醫(yī)學. 2012(06)



本文編號：3101056