【摘要】：被害人救濟(jì)制度的建立顯示著國(guó)家的文明程度,救濟(jì)被害人的水平是國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展水準(zhǔn)的綜合反映,確認(rèn)并實(shí)現(xiàn)救濟(jì)是被害人尋求個(gè)人權(quán)益保護(hù)的主要內(nèi)容。但由于訴訟機(jī)制的局限,被害人在客觀上難以通過(guò)訴訟程序充分實(shí)現(xiàn)其賠償訴求。面對(duì)由此帶來(lái)的矛盾與沖突,近年來(lái)各國(guó)和地區(qū)根據(jù)各自具體情況分別進(jìn)行了關(guān)于被害人救濟(jì)的立法與實(shí)踐,并在積極實(shí)踐的過(guò)程中積累了一定的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與先進(jìn)理念。這些有益的探索與實(shí)踐對(duì)我國(guó)在法律層面上構(gòu)建一套符合國(guó)情的被害人救濟(jì)制度有著重要的借鑒意義。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)被害人救濟(jì)基本理論的分析與研究,結(jié)合我國(guó)部分地區(qū)的被害人救助試點(diǎn)工作的實(shí)證分析和對(duì)部分域外國(guó)家的立法考察,在其中總結(jié)探索出一種適合我國(guó)被害人救濟(jì)制度的救濟(jì)模式和立法模式,并對(duì)這項(xiàng)制度的原則、對(duì)象、條件、范圍、機(jī)構(gòu)、金額和救助的程序等內(nèi)容予以規(guī)范。 本文共分為五章。第一章主要探討了被害人救濟(jì)制度的相關(guān)概念和價(jià)值,對(duì)被害人進(jìn)行了界定,并闡述了該救濟(jì)制度的概念與價(jià)值。第二章介紹了被害人救濟(jì)制度的基本理論,對(duì)被害人救濟(jì)制度中的多種理論學(xué)說(shuō)進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的闡釋,并分別對(duì)其進(jìn)行評(píng)析,提出以“國(guó)家責(zé)任說(shuō)為核心,社會(huì)福利說(shuō)為補(bǔ)充”作為我國(guó)構(gòu)建該制度的理論依據(jù)。第三章對(duì)我國(guó)當(dāng)前被害人救濟(jì)制度各地嘗試實(shí)踐運(yùn)行的現(xiàn)狀和存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析,力求為構(gòu)建我國(guó)被害人救濟(jì)制度提供寶貴的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)。而在第四章中則是參考英美法系和大陸法系中的一些典型國(guó)家有關(guān)被害人救濟(jì)制度的立法情況,在此之中找尋出值得我國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)與借鑒之處,并在本文的最后一章嘗試構(gòu)建出一種適合我國(guó)的合理有效的被害人救濟(jì)制度。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the victim relief system shows the civilization degree of the country. The level of the victim relief is a comprehensive reflection of the level of national economic and social development, and the recognition and realization of relief is the main content of the victim seeking personal rights and interests protection. However, due to the limitation of litigation mechanism, it is difficult for victims to fully realize their claims for compensation through litigation procedure. In recent years, countries and regions have carried out legislation and practice on victim relief according to their specific circumstances, and have accumulated some experience and advanced ideas in the process of positive practice in the face of the conflicts and conflicts brought about by it. These beneficial exploration and practice have important reference significance for our country to construct a set of victim relief system in accordance with the national conditions on the legal level. Through the analysis and research of the basic theory of victim relief, combined with the empirical analysis of the pilot work of victim relief in some areas of our country and the legislative investigation of some countries outside the territory, This paper summarizes and explores a relief model and legislative model suitable for the victim relief system in our country, and standardizes the principle, object, condition, scope, organization, amount and procedure of the system. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter mainly discusses the related concepts and values of the victim relief system, defines the victim, and expounds the concept and value of the relief system. The second chapter introduces the basic theory of the victim relief system, explains the various theories of the victim relief system, analyzes it separately, and puts forward the theory of state responsibility as the core. The theory of social welfare as a supplement "serves as the theoretical basis for the construction of this system in China." The third chapter analyzes the present situation and existing problems of our country's current victim relief system, and tries to provide valuable practical experience for the construction of our country's victim relief system. The fourth chapter refers to the legislation of some typical countries in the Anglo-American law system and the civil law system about the victim relief system, and finds out some points which our country should learn from and use for reference in this chapter. And in the last chapter of this paper, we try to construct a reasonable and effective victim relief system which is suitable for our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.182.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王昭振;;刑事被害人國(guó)家救助:一種社會(huì)政策的公共選擇[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

2 廣東省佛山市中級(jí)人民法院課題組;;刑事附帶民事訴訟案件審理與執(zhí)行情況的調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];法律適用;2008年07期

3 廣東省東莞市中級(jí)人民法院課題組;何碧霞;孫長(zhǎng)永;李紅輝;;論建立統(tǒng)一的刑事被害人司法救濟(jì)制度[J];法律適用;2010年01期

4 王琳;;被害人國(guó)家補(bǔ)償制度的路徑選擇[J];法治論壇;2007年02期

5 王亞明;盧希起;;刑事被害人國(guó)家補(bǔ)償制度簡(jiǎn)論[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

6 楊向華;;論犯罪被害人的過(guò)錯(cuò)[J];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

7 楊瑞;刑事附帶民事訴訟制度的檢討——從被害人權(quán)利保護(hù)角度[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

8 李楠;;刑事被害人補(bǔ)償制度的比較分析與本土制度建構(gòu)[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

9 李波陽(yáng),呂繼東;建議確立刑事被害人援助制度[J];河北法學(xué);2003年03期

10 孫彩虹;亞洲犯罪被害人補(bǔ)償法律制度比較研究[J];河北法學(xué);2004年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：2432927