【摘要】：行政復(fù)議是我國(guó)當(dāng)前解決行政糾紛重要的、有效的手段。隨著行政復(fù)議法制建設(shè)的發(fā)展與完善，調(diào)解被社會(huì)廣泛的應(yīng)用，復(fù)議適用調(diào)解已成為目前法學(xué)界探討的重要課題之一，可見調(diào)解尊重行政糾紛雙方當(dāng)事人自主選擇權(quán)，是真實(shí)的意思表示。因此，行政復(fù)議運(yùn)行中不斷完善調(diào)解制度，對(duì)于解決復(fù)議當(dāng)事人之間糾紛具有重要意義。本文共分四部分，第一部分闡述了選題的意義、研究現(xiàn)狀和方法；第二部分介紹了行政復(fù)議調(diào)解制度的立法現(xiàn)狀和實(shí)踐考察，提出了復(fù)議調(diào)解制度存在的問(wèn)題。第三部分以案例形式論述復(fù)議適用調(diào)解必要性。第四部分從法理理論角度分析行政復(fù)議適用調(diào)解可行性，提出了復(fù)議調(diào)解制度的完善建議，，證明了復(fù)議調(diào)解是解決行政糾紛的重要渠道。
[Abstract]:Administrative reconsideration is an important and effective means to solve administrative disputes. With the development and perfection of the legal system of administrative reconsideration, mediation is widely used in the society. The application of mediation in reconsideration has become one of the most important topics in the field of law. It can be seen that mediation respects the independent right of choice of both parties to an administrative dispute. Is the expression of true meaning. Therefore, it is of great significance to improve the mediation system in the operation of administrative reconsideration. This paper is divided into four parts, the first part describes the significance of the topic, research status and methods; the second part introduces the legislative status and practice of the administrative reconsideration mediation system, and puts forward the existing problems of the reconsideration mediation system. The third part discusses the necessity of mediation in the form of case. The fourth part analyzes the feasibility of applying mediation to administrative reconsideration from the angle of legal theory, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of reconsideration mediation, which proves that reconsideration mediation is an important channel for resolving administrative disputes.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.11

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖建華;楊兵;;對(duì)抗制與調(diào)解制度的沖突與融合——美國(guó)調(diào)解制度對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];比較法研究;2006年04期

2 張千帆;;行政自由裁量權(quán)的法律控制——以美國(guó)行政法為視角[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年03期

3 馬柳穎;;行政糾紛調(diào)解機(jī)制構(gòu)建的法理分析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年04期

4 羅豪才;行政法的核心與理論模式[J];法學(xué);2002年08期

5 孟昭陽(yáng);湯凱;;行政復(fù)議調(diào)解適用問(wèn)題研究——以公安行政復(fù)議調(diào)解為視角[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

6 吳仁偉;;行政復(fù)議調(diào)解的概念、價(jià)值與正當(dāng)性[J];公安學(xué)刊(浙江警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2009年02期

7 王曉鳴;;行政復(fù)議調(diào)解制度具體應(yīng)用問(wèn)題探討[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2008年03期

8 尹力;調(diào)解含義界說(shuō)[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

9 呂國(guó)江;行政復(fù)議的特征[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

10 高軒;行政復(fù)議適用調(diào)解的必要性及其適用條件[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年05期

本文編號(hào)：2429811