【摘要】：自《中華人民共和國土地管理法》頒布至今,我國立法一直秉承農(nóng)村宅基地的保障功能,將宅基地使用權(quán)作為農(nóng)民的生活保障,禁止其流轉(zhuǎn)。中國共產(chǎn)黨十八屆三中全會(huì)通過了《中共中央關(guān)于全面深化改革若干重大問題的決定》,其中提到了對(duì)農(nóng)村宅基地改革的相關(guān)意見,從而在民間和法律界引發(fā)了關(guān)于農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的熱議。筆者從農(nóng)村宅基地的基本理論出發(fā),結(jié)合當(dāng)下中國部分試點(diǎn)在宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)方面的做法,通過歸納總結(jié),提出贊成有限制地允許農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)。并就如何具體規(guī)制提出設(shè)想。文章分為如下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分：概括了宅基地使用權(quán)相關(guān)基本概念,并從建國前后分析,對(duì)不同歷史時(shí)期農(nóng)村宅基地的所有權(quán)和使用權(quán)歸屬進(jìn)行劃分。 第二部分：分析了目前關(guān)于宅基地使用權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓、抵押、繼承的立法以及各自在實(shí)踐中遇到的困境。 第三部分：對(duì)天津、重慶、成都、廣東四個(gè)試點(diǎn)在農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)上的做法逐一進(jìn)行評(píng)析。 第四部分：分析理論界提出的農(nóng)村宅基地“禁止流轉(zhuǎn)說”、“有限制地流轉(zhuǎn)說”、“自由流轉(zhuǎn)說”的各自理由,并提出有限制地允許農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)。 第五部分：分析有限制地允許農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的原因。具體包括兩方面：在第一方面,通過結(jié)合十八屆三種全會(huì)的改革意見,論述農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的必要性；第二方面,深入分析為何要對(duì)流轉(zhuǎn)附加限制條件。 第六部分：提出具體如何規(guī)制農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)的流轉(zhuǎn)。這是本文的核心部分,主要論述了農(nóng)村宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)的前提規(guī)制和具體的流轉(zhuǎn)方式。在前提規(guī)制方面包括重新認(rèn)定“一戶一宅”原則、明晰權(quán)屬、登記生效、空閑宅基地使用權(quán)禁止流轉(zhuǎn)；在流轉(zhuǎn)方式上具體討論了宅基地使用權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓、抵押、繼承和贈(zèng)與。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation of the Land Management Law of the people's Republic of China, the legislation of our country has been adhering to the protection function of the rural homestead, taking the right to use the homestead as the living security of the peasants and prohibiting its circulation. The third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee adopted the "decision of the CPC Central Committee on comprehensively deepening the Reform", which refers to the relevant opinions on the reform of rural homestead. Thus in the civil and legal circles triggered on the transfer of rural homestead use hot debate. Starting from the basic theory of rural homestead, combined with the current practice of some pilot projects in China in the transfer of homestead, through summing up, the author proposes to allow the circulation of rural homestead right to use in a restricted way. And how to regulate the specific ideas. The article is divided into the following parts: the first part: summarizes the basic concepts of homestead use right, and analyzes the ownership and ownership of rural homestead in different historical periods from before and after the founding of the people's Republic of China. The second part analyzes the current transfer of homestead use right, mortgage, inheritance legislation and the difficulties encountered in practice. The third part: four pilot projects in Tianjin, Chongqing, Chengdu and Guangdong. The fourth part analyzes the respective reasons of the theory of "forbidden circulation", "restricted circulation" and "free circulation" of rural homestead, and puts forward the limited permission to transfer the right to use rural homestead. The fifth part: analyze the reason why the use right of rural homestead is allowed to be transferred in a limited way. Specifically includes two aspects: first, by combining the reform opinions of the 18th plenary session, discusses the necessity of the transfer of the right to use the rural homestead; second, in-depth analysis of why to attach restrictions on the circulation. The sixth part: how to regulate the circulation of rural homestead use right. This is the core part of this paper, mainly discusses the rural homestead transfer of the premise of regulation and specific ways of circulation. In the aspect of premise regulation, the principle of "one house and one house" is redefined, the right of ownership is clearly defined, the registration takes effect, the right to use the free homestead is prohibited from circulation, and the transfer, mortgage, inheritance and gift of the right to use the homestead are discussed concretely in the way of circulation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟勤國;物權(quán)法開禁農(nóng)村宅基地交易之辯[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年04期

2 李滿枝;;物權(quán)法下宅基地使用權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)讓[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

3 汪軍民;;宅基地使用權(quán)的立法問題探討[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期

4 王崇敏;孫靜;;農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)析論[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

5 周中舉;;論農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)的流轉(zhuǎn)[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年03期

6 郭明瑞;;關(guān)于宅基地使用權(quán)的立法建議[J];法學(xué)論壇;2007年01期

7 韓玉斌;農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)立法的價(jià)值選擇[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年05期

8 李永安,趙紅衛(wèi);論我國宅基地使用權(quán)法律制度嬗變[J];學(xué)習(xí)論壇;2004年12期

9 姚麗;魏西云;章波;;北京市郊區(qū)宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[J];中國土地;2007年02期

10 呂軍書;徐明華;;我國農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)制度的法律重構(gòu)[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2416625