【摘要】：海盜行為威脅世界海運(yùn)秩序和我國(guó)航運(yùn)安全,各國(guó)在實(shí)踐中發(fā)現(xiàn)借助軍隊(duì)護(hù)航有其局限性,因此很多航運(yùn)主體更加青睞保安公司,實(shí)務(wù)中部分保安服務(wù)等級(jí)也升級(jí)至配備私人武裝,但配備私人武裝的合理性尚存質(zhì)疑。我國(guó)政府不允許國(guó)內(nèi)保安公司配備私人武裝,很多航運(yùn)主體轉(zhuǎn)向雇傭配備私人武裝的外國(guó)保安公司,并根據(jù)保安公司與客戶之間的服務(wù)合同當(dāng)中并無(wú)"配備武裝"字樣免責(zé)。考慮到默示接受行業(yè)習(xí)慣和限制適用意思自治原則兩個(gè)問(wèn)題,雇傭外國(guó)保安服務(wù)如果違反我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法的強(qiáng)制規(guī)定,我國(guó)航運(yùn)主體同樣應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)法律責(zé)任。
[Abstract]:Piracy threatens the world shipping order and the safety of shipping in China. In practice, countries have found that the use of military escort has its limitations, so many shipping bodies prefer security companies. In practice, some security services are upgraded to private armed forces, but the reasonableness of equipping them remains questionable. Our government does not allow domestic security companies to be equipped with private arms, and many shipping bodies turn to foreign security companies equipped with private arms, and there is no exemption for "armed" under service contracts between security companies and customers. Considering the two problems of tacit acceptance of the trade custom and the principle of limiting the autonomy of application of the will, if the employment of foreign security services violates the compulsory provisions of our domestic law, the subject of shipping in our country should also bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
【作者單位】： 大連海事大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)基金一般項(xiàng)目“海上防空識(shí)別區(qū)理論與實(shí)踐的法律研究”(14BFX128) 國(guó)家哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“海洋行政體制改革的法律保障研究”(13BFX037)的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賀小勇;;上海自貿(mào)試驗(yàn)區(qū)法治深化亟需解決的法律問(wèn)題[J];東方法學(xué);2017年01期

2 劉笑晨;王淑敏;;全球治理視角下打擊海上恐怖主義的法律機(jī)制問(wèn)題初探[J];中國(guó)海商法研究;2016年04期

3 佟堯;王國(guó)華;;中國(guó)海事關(guān)系法律適用法完善之研究——《海商法》第十四章修改的必要性及具體建議[J];中國(guó)海商法研究;2016年04期

4 曾志平;;一種對(duì)軍事法知識(shí)來(lái)源的追溯:論命令權(quán)[J];政法論叢;2016年04期

5 袁s，

本文編號(hào)：2398596