防控行政裁量權(quán)濫用問(wèn)題研究
[Abstract]:As we all know, public power has initiative and expansibility, if it is not restricted, it will inevitably damage the legitimate rights of citizens. Executive power is the most closely related power with citizens, is an indispensable part of the state power system, and has the greatest influence on civil rights. As a kind of administrative power, administrative discretion deeply affects the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterpart. Since the 20th century, with the increasing expansion of administrative power, administrative discretion also widely exists in various fields of administrative behavior. It is like a "double-edged sword". On the one hand, it can make the administrative subject judge the situation, deal with administrative problems flexibly and flexibly, and improve the administrative efficiency. On the other hand, it also easily leads to the abuse and loss of control of power and infringes on the legal rights of citizens. To undermine the seriousness and authority of laws and regulations. Rational use of administrative discretion, eliminating its negative effects and strengthening the control of abuse of administrative discretion are the inevitable requirements of ruling the country by law in a modern country ruled by law. The prevention and control of the abuse of administrative discretion, whether in civil law countries or in common law countries, has been studied as the core issue of administrative law, and many preventive measures have been put forward. The main content of this paper is to discuss the main forms of the abuse of administrative discretion in our country under the current circumstances, the analysis of the reasons for the abuse of administrative discretion, and how to effectively prevent and control the abuse of administrative discretion. This paper focuses on proving the prevention and control of the abuse of administrative discretion, combining the situation and reality of our country, and putting forward new feasible schemes on the basis of the traditional prevention and control measures, which can realize the legal and reasonable application of the administrative discretion. Finally, it is of theoretical and practical significance to promote our country's administration according to law and to build a socialist country ruled by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D922.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吳紅宇;知情權(quán)、WTO與政府信息公開(kāi)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年08期
2 袁明圣;對(duì)濫用職權(quán)與顯失公正行為的司法審查[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1996年06期
3 鄭春燕;;行政裁量中的政策考量——以“運(yùn)動(dòng)式”執(zhí)法為例[J];法商研究;2008年02期
4 肖萍;楊旋;;關(guān)于我國(guó)行政聽(tīng)證制度的立法構(gòu)想[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年07期
5 王貴松;;行政裁量權(quán)收縮之要件分析——以危險(xiǎn)防止型行政為中心[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年03期
6 江必新;;論行政程序的正當(dāng)性及其監(jiān)督[J];法治研究;2011年01期
7 張明杰;行政自由裁量權(quán)及其法律控制[J];法學(xué)研究;1995年04期
8 朱芒;論行政程序正當(dāng)化的法根據(jù)——日本行政程序法的發(fā)展及其啟示[J];外國(guó)法譯評(píng);1997年01期
9 郭道暉;法治行政與行政權(quán)的發(fā)展[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1999年01期
10 司久貴;行政自由裁量權(quán)若干問(wèn)題探討[J];行政法學(xué)研究;1998年02期
本文編號(hào):2398469
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2398469.html