【摘要】：“食”乃生命之本，是百姓生活中重要的組成部分之一。隨著我國經(jīng)濟不斷的發(fā)展，人們對食品安全問題的關(guān)注從滿足溫飽到注重安全，經(jīng)歷了艱難而復雜的過程。近年來，食品安全事件頻發(fā)，食品安全問題成為人們當前生活中談之色變的社會毒瘤，這其中不乏食品生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營者的原因，但同時也反映了我國食品安全法律責任制度的薄弱。2009年實施的《中華人民共和國食品安全法》雖然對法律責任的規(guī)定較以往有所進步，但仍有不足之處，因此，有必要對我國食品安全法律責任制度進行系統(tǒng)地研究。 本文以“我國食品安全法律責任制度研究”為題，除導論和結(jié)論外，共分為四大部分。 第一部分為食品安全法律責任的基礎(chǔ)理論。本部分先簡要介紹食品安全法律責任的概念，比較辨析與其他法律責任的異同，進而分析食品安全法律責任的特征及分類。其次，詳盡論述食品安全法律責任制度的原則。最后，梳理食品安全法律責任制度的補償功能、懲罰功能和遏制功能以及公平、正義、秩序等價值。 第二部分主要研究國外食品安全法律責任制度。通過對美國、歐盟、日本的食品安全法律責任制度的比較分析，總結(jié)各自食品安全法律責任制度的特點，進而為完善我國食品安全法律責任制度提供可借鑒的經(jīng)驗和做法。 第三部分是對我國食品安全法律責任制度的反思。全面介紹我國食品安全法律責任的立法發(fā)展，并從市場主體、監(jiān)管主體兩個角度論述我國食品安全法律責任制度的立法現(xiàn)狀，從而總結(jié)出我國食品安全法律責任制度存在的缺陷。 第四部分提出完善我國食品安全法律責任制度的構(gòu)想。首先，從我國食品安全法律責任制度的立法理念、總體思路以及食品安全民事和刑事規(guī)制的重構(gòu)三個方面提出我國食品安全法律責任制度的體系構(gòu)想。其次，，對于市場主體分別從統(tǒng)一民事歸責原則、完善懲罰性賠償則制度、加大市場主體食品安全行政處罰力度、設(shè)立行政雙罰制、完善行政責任與刑事責任的銜接機制、調(diào)整食品安全犯罪類別的歸屬、完善罰金刑、增加相關(guān)的資格刑等方面加以完善。最后，對于監(jiān)管主體要擴大國家賠償責任的范圍、明確食品安全監(jiān)管責任主體、擴展行政責任的實現(xiàn)形式、建立行政責任追究程序、完善食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪的條文設(shè)計、明確監(jiān)管主體責任、將受賄罪與食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪數(shù)罪并罰。
[Abstract]:Food is the foundation of life and one of the important parts of people's life. With the development of Chinese economy, people have experienced a difficult and complicated process from satisfying food and clothing to paying attention to safety. In recent years, food safety incidents have occurred frequently, and food safety issues have become a social cancer that people talk about in their current lives, among which there are many reasons for food production and operators. However, it also reflects the weakness of the legal liability system for food safety in our country. Although the Food Safety Law of the people's Republic of China implemented in 2009, although the provisions on legal liability have made progress, but there are still some deficiencies, therefore, It is necessary to systematically study the legal liability system of food safety in China. This paper is entitled "study on the legal liability system of Food Safety in China", which is divided into four parts except the introduction and conclusion. The first part is the basic theory of food safety legal liability. This part first briefly introduces the concept of legal liability for food safety, compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between legal liability and other legal responsibilities, and then analyzes the characteristics and classification of legal liability for food safety. Secondly, the principle of food safety legal liability system is discussed in detail. Finally, the compensation function, punishment function and containment function of the legal liability system for food safety and the values of fairness, justice and order are combed. The second part mainly studies the foreign food safety legal liability system. Through the comparative analysis of the food safety legal liability system of the United States, the European Union and Japan, this paper summarizes the characteristics of their respective food safety legal liability systems, and then provides the experience and practice for the perfection of the food safety legal liability system in China. The third part is the reflection on the legal liability system of food safety in China. This paper introduces the legislative development of the legal responsibility for food safety in our country, and discusses the current legislative situation of the legal liability system of food safety in China from two angles: the main body of the market and the subject of supervision. The defects of the legal liability system of food safety in China are summarized. The fourth part puts forward the idea of perfecting the legal liability system of food safety in China. First of all, from the aspects of legislation concept, general idea and reconstruction of civil and criminal regulation of food safety, this paper puts forward the system conception of food safety legal liability system in China. Secondly, to the market subject from unifies the civil liability principle, consummates the punitive damages rule system, increases the market main body food safety administrative punishment dynamics, establishes the administrative double penalty system, consummates the administrative responsibility and the criminal responsibility connection mechanism, Adjust the classification of food safety crime, improve the fine penalty, increase the relevant qualification penalty and so on. Finally, the main body of supervision should expand the scope of national liability for compensation, clarify the main body of responsibility for food safety supervision, expand the form of administrative responsibility, establish the procedure of investigation of administrative responsibility, and perfect the design of the provisions of the crime of malfeasance in food supervision. Clear supervision of the main responsibility, bribery and food supervision dereliction of duty crime combined punishment.
【學位授予單位】：浙江財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王本宏;論懲罰性賠償在合同領(lǐng)域的適用[J];安徽電力職工大學學報;2002年02期

2 劉雯,方曉陽;美國食品安全監(jiān)管體系[J];安徽醫(yī)藥;2005年01期

3 浦川道太郎;;日本法上的懲罰性損害賠償與制裁性慰謝金[J];法學家;2001年05期

4 鄧成明;陽建勛;;無形損失、履行差錯與十倍賠償——對《食品安全法》第96條第2款的法經(jīng)濟分析[J];廣州大學學報(社會科學版);2009年09期

5 梁昌全;;我國食品安全刑事立法的修改與完善[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年09期

6 胡啟忠;;法律正義與法律價值之關(guān)系辨正[J];河北法學;2010年03期

7 王德章;呂金蓮;;食品安全監(jiān)管問題研究[J];黑龍江對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年07期

8 劉道遠;;食品安全監(jiān)管法律責任研究[J];河南大學學報(社會科學版);2012年04期

9 杜國明;;論《食品安全法》的民事責任制度[J];廣西社會科學;2011年05期

10 艾爾肯;張榆;;論《食品安全法》中的懲罰性賠償制度——兼評《食品安全法》第96條[J];遼寧師范大學學報(社會科學版);2011年05期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉暢;日本食品安全規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學;2010年

本文編號：2398092