【摘要】：司法是法治政府的重要保障,其機(jī)制是通過(guò)訴訟監(jiān)督政府依法行政。但在目前中國(guó)的體制中,司法在意志方面和人、財(cái)、物方面對(duì)行政都具有從屬性,因而不能發(fā)揮監(jiān)督保障作用。尤其在意志方面,基于制度要求,司法機(jī)關(guān)在裁判案件時(shí)要適用行政法規(guī)和參照適用規(guī)章而無(wú)審查之權(quán),司法機(jī)關(guān)實(shí)際成了行政意志的執(zhí)行者而非政府與其他主體糾紛之間的裁判者。這種情形與憲法規(guī)定的司法機(jī)關(guān)依法獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)不受行政機(jī)關(guān)干涉的要求相悖。我國(guó)司法對(duì)行政的從屬性有其歷史的成因和特定的歷史功能,在新中國(guó)成立初期及計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)期都發(fā)揮過(guò)特殊的作用,但是隨著改革的深入和社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型,特別是國(guó)家法律體系基本建成和法治政府目標(biāo)的提出,司法對(duì)政府的監(jiān)督制度的完善也就勢(shì)在必行。
[Abstract]:Judicature is an important guarantee of the government ruled by law, and its mechanism is to supervise the government administration according to law through litigation. But in the present system of China, the judicature has the following attribute to the administration in the aspect of will, person, money and material, so it can not play the role of supervision and guarantee. Especially in the aspect of will, on the basis of institutional requirements, the judicial organs should apply administrative regulations and refer to applicable rules and regulations without the power of review when adjudicating cases. The judiciary is actually the executor of the administrative will rather than the adjudicator between the government and other subjects. This situation contradicts the constitutional requirement that the judiciary exercise its jurisdiction independently according to law and not subject to interference by the executive. China's judicial subordination to administration has its historical causes and specific historical functions. It has played a special role in the early stage of the founding of New China and in the planned economic period, but with the deepening of reform and social transformation, Especially, with the establishment of the national legal system and the establishment of the goal of the government ruled by law, it is imperative to perfect the supervision system of the government by the administration of justice.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1;D926

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張憲威;徐豐;;政府改革要正確處理好四對(duì)關(guān)系[J];理論導(dǎo)報(bào);2006年10期

2 吳國(guó)英;“越位”、“缺位”、“錯(cuò)位”與“弱化”、“強(qiáng)化”、“轉(zhuǎn)化”——關(guān)于政府職能轉(zhuǎn)化和依法行政的思考[J];上海青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

3 邵萍英,黃劉生;也談依法行政[J];池州師專學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

4 薛德合;楊文圣;;論法治政府是政治文明的內(nèi)在要求[J];企業(yè)家天地;2006年08期

5 黃瑩;;淺談我國(guó)依法行政的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];企業(yè)家天地下半月刊(理論版);2010年01期

6 喬娟;;淺析服務(wù)型政府責(zé)任機(jī)制的構(gòu)建[J];職業(yè)圈;2007年24期

7 劉立霞;;論我國(guó)實(shí)行政府信息公開的價(jià)值[J];理論前沿;2008年16期

8 黃潔,王福友;依法治省的若干理論問(wèn)題[J];理論探討;2003年04期

9 韋志紅;;加強(qiáng)依法行政的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(上旬刊);2010年04期

10 張繼承;;提高依法行政主體素質(zhì)芻議[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 方天縱;王瑞芬;王會(huì)清;;天津市水土保持預(yù)防監(jiān)督工作淺談[A];水土保持依法行政的理論與方法——中國(guó)水土保持學(xué)會(huì)預(yù)防監(jiān)督專業(yè)委員會(huì)第六次會(huì)議暨學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

2 崔俊峰;;如何提升煙草專賣隊(duì)伍文明執(zhí)法水平[A];河南省煙草學(xué)會(huì)2008年學(xué)術(shù)交流獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募ㄏ拢C];2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姜紅偉;以法治思維構(gòu)建執(zhí)行力政府[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2333895