本文關(guān)鍵詞：論行政可訴性原則之確立，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

 在分類(lèi)學(xué)科中查詢(xún)

所有學(xué)科

公安

訴訟法與司法制度

行政可訴性

     Administrative Actionability for Responsibility Confirmation of Road Traffic Accidents

     論道路交通事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的行政可訴性

短句來(lái)源

     A Study of the Administrative Actionability of Investigative Acts of Public Security Authorities

     公安偵查行為行政可訴性研究

短句來(lái)源

     Analysis on the Possibility of the Administrative Lawsuit against the Decision on the Tourist Complaints

     旅游投訴處理決定的行政可訴性評(píng)析

短句來(lái)源

     Since the public nature is a kind of administrative confirmation action, so it can be suited.

     因?yàn)楣C行為的“公”職性質(zhì)是一種行政確認(rèn)行為，行政確認(rèn)行為具有行政可訴性，公證行為具有行政可訴性。

短句來(lái)源

     Which can be sued for compensation in the controversial practice is controversial, this paper focuses, executive compensation through litigation to resolve disputes;

     其中關(guān)于補(bǔ)償爭(zhēng)議的行政可訴性是實(shí)踐中爭(zhēng)議較大的，本文重點(diǎn)論述，提出行政補(bǔ)償爭(zhēng)議應(yīng)通過(guò)訴訟途徑解決：雖然國(guó)外有將補(bǔ)償訴訟作為民事案件審理的做法，，但人民法院應(yīng)作為行政案件審理；

短句來(lái)源

     This paper discusses the controversial executive compensation litigation, compensation lawsuits admissibility condition, and a decision of the trial proceedings, the application of the law of compensation proceedings, compensation litigation inspiration for the "Administrative Procedural Law," the revised five issues.

     本文主要論及補(bǔ)償爭(zhēng)議的行政可訴性、補(bǔ)償訴訟的受理?xiàng)l件、補(bǔ)償訴訟的審理及判決方式、補(bǔ)償訴訟的法律適用、補(bǔ)償訴訟制度對(duì)《行政訴訟法》修訂的啟示等五個(gè)問(wèn)題。

短句來(lái)源

     On the Establishment of Litigable Principle in Administrative Law

     論行政可訴性原則之確立

短句來(lái)源

     In the legal norms and judicial practices, there are many contradictions and differences about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued.

     在法律規(guī)范和司法實(shí)踐中,關(guān)于火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的行政可訴性問(wèn)題存在著現(xiàn)實(shí)的矛盾和分歧。

短句來(lái)源

更多       

     Prosecutability of Abstract Administrative Behavior

     抽象行政行為的可訴性

短句來(lái)源

     On Litigation of the Abstract Administrative Behaviors

     試論抽象行政行為的可訴性

短句來(lái)源

     Opinions on the Problem of Claim on Abstract Administrative Action

     論抽象行政行為的可訴性

短句來(lái)源

     On suability of abstract administrative action

     論抽象行政行為的可訴性

短句來(lái)源

     Analysis of the litigable nature of administrative factual action

     行政事實(shí)行為的可訴性分析

短句來(lái)源

查詢(xún)“行政可訴性”譯詞為用戶(hù)自定義的雙語(yǔ)例句
    我想查看譯文中含有：的雙語(yǔ)例句

There are more and more misuses of administrative lawsuit in public security investigation with more and more overuses of civilians, legal persons and organizations legal rights in the investigation by public security organizations.To solve the problems in the action,there are litigants for lawsuit,peoples courts for reception and some other organizations for proofs.

隨著公安機(jī)關(guān)在偵查過(guò)程中對(duì)公民、法人和其他組織合法權(quán)益的侵害增多 ,公安偵查行為行政可訴性的不完善性越來(lái)越明顯。解決這一問(wèn)題辦法即通過(guò)形式審查當(dāng)事人的起訴后 ,由人民法院行政庭全部受理當(dāng)事人對(duì)公安偵查行為的訴訟 ,再由法院對(duì)案件進(jìn)行實(shí)體審查 ,審查案件的法律依據(jù)和事實(shí)依據(jù)并確定其偵查行為的性質(zhì) ,進(jìn)而確定其是否具有可訴性 ,是否應(yīng)該支持當(dāng)事人的訴訟請(qǐng)求。

In the legal norms and judicial practices, there are many contradictions and differences about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued. In order to clarify the essence of this question, we only recognize its basic attribute from the nature of the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire, and grasp the effect of the legal provisions about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire from the angle of legal principles, then we will make clear...

In the legal norms and judicial practices, there are many contradictions and differences about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued. In order to clarify the essence of this question, we only recognize its basic attribute from the nature of the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire, and grasp the effect of the legal provisions about the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire from the angle of legal principles, then we will make clear that the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire is a kind of concrete administrative behavior that can be sued. The author expects that those improper legal provisions can be abolished as soon as possible and a consensus can be reached on the affirmation of the accidental responsibility in the fire that can be sued, so that the socialist construction governed by the law can be advanced and the fundamental interests of the people can be safeguarded.

在法律規(guī)范和司法實(shí)踐中,關(guān)于火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的行政可訴性問(wèn)題存在著現(xiàn)實(shí)的矛盾和分歧。為了澄清問(wèn)題的實(shí)質(zhì),筆者從火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的本質(zhì)出發(fā),清楚認(rèn)識(shí)其根本屬性,并從法理的角度理順火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的有關(guān)法律規(guī)定的位階、效力,進(jìn)而明確火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定是一種可訴的具體行政行為,以期在我國(guó)法律制度中盡快取消一切與此相對(duì)的不適當(dāng)?shù)姆梢?guī)定,對(duì)于火災(zāi)事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定的行政可訴性形成統(tǒng)一的認(rèn)識(shí),以更好地推進(jìn)我國(guó)社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè),維護(hù)廣大人民的根本利益。

Whether the cognizance of traffic accident responsibility may have its nature of adminis- trative litigation has at all times been the focus for debate between the academic circle in theory and the judicial circle in practice.“The Safety Act of Roadway Traffic”implemented on May 1, 2004 has resolved this issue.This Act calls off the cognizance of public security authority regard- ing the responsibility of roadway traffic accident,and hands over the jurisdiction of this kind of accident to the People's Court.The...

Whether the cognizance of traffic accident responsibility may have its nature of adminis- trative litigation has at all times been the focus for debate between the academic circle in theory and the judicial circle in practice.“The Safety Act of Roadway Traffic”implemented on May 1, 2004 has resolved this issue.This Act calls off the cognizance of public security authority regard- ing the responsibility of roadway traffic accident,and hands over the jurisdiction of this kind of accident to the People's Court.The implementation of this Act indicates that the treatment of roadway traffic accident in our country has become more rightful,at the same time,has con- formed to the tendency of international judicial practice.

交通事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定是否具有行政可訴性一直是理論界和審判實(shí)務(wù)界長(zhǎng)期爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)。2004年5月1日實(shí)施的《中華人民共和國(guó)道路交通安全法》解決了這個(gè)問(wèn)題,取消了公安機(jī)關(guān)道路交通事故責(zé)任認(rèn)定權(quán),將事故的裁判權(quán)交由人民法院。此法的實(shí)施標(biāo)志著我國(guó)道路交通事故的處理更加合理,同時(shí)也更符合與國(guó)際司法接軌的大趨勢(shì)。

 相關(guān)查詢(xún)

CNKI小工具

在英文學(xué)術(shù)搜索中查有關(guān)行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

在知識(shí)搜索中查有關(guān)行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

在數(shù)字搜索中查有關(guān)行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

在概念知識(shí)元中查有關(guān)行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

在學(xué)術(shù)趨勢(shì)中查有關(guān)行政可訴性的內(nèi)容

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：論行政可訴性原則之確立，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。