【摘要】：2010年,《關于案例指導工作的規(guī)定》的出臺,標志著案例指導制度的正式形成。行政案例指導制度作為該制度的重要構成部分,其承載著案例指導制度一般性的基礎理論。但是,指導性案例在行政、刑事、民事等領域面臨的難題有所差異。行政指導性案例在司法實踐應用中所遇到的困境不過是案例指導制度發(fā)展的縮影,問題的根源就在于《規(guī)定》中建立起的體系。研究行政案例指導制度不僅可以改善行政訴訟,提高行政案件審判效率,對于我國案例指導制度的未來發(fā)展也將產生重要影響。研究行政案例指導制度必然不可忽視《規(guī)定》中所建構起的案例指導制度的體系。系統(tǒng)的把握《規(guī)定》中的內容和體系,才能夠更好的針對行政案例指導制度提出一些切實可行的建議。礙于我國行政案例指導制度尚處于發(fā)展的初期,因此,借鑒域外行政判例制度的發(fā)展經驗不失為完善該套制度的途徑之一。文章在概括我國行政指導性案例司法實踐中的難題時,通過總結近六年行政指導性案例的適用情況,概括出其效力不明確、數(shù)量不足、援引少、地方差異性、保障機制不健全等問題�？偟膩碇v,也就是行政指導性案例在遴選機制、適用保障機制、效力爭議等方面存在的問題。文章在最后,依據行政指導性案例的適用現(xiàn)狀和問題,結合我國的具體司法實踐,探討了完善我國行政案例指導制度的對策。在效力層面,筆者主要希望通過完善適用保障機制,加之以硬性的規(guī)定,通過廣泛大量的司法實踐,從而達成確定行政指導性案例效力的共識。在遴選機制上,文章主要提出了擴大發(fā)布主體,也就是允許高級人民法院發(fā)布行政指導性案例,建立專門的行政指導性案例遴選委員會。在適用保障機制的完善中,主要從法律工作者的職業(yè)培訓、指導性案例引用機制、行政案例背離報告機制三個角度展開了論述�？偟膩砜�,行政案例指導制度的發(fā)展狀況不容樂觀,回答行政指導性案例在司法實踐中遇到的難題,不僅關系到其指導性價值的發(fā)揮,對于我國整體案例指導制度的發(fā)展都將產生重要影響。
[Abstract]:In 2010, the introduction of the provisions on case guidance marked the formal formation of the case guidance system. As an important part of the system, the administrative case guidance system bears the general basic theory of the case guidance system. However, the guiding cases in the administrative, criminal, civil and other areas faced with different problems. The dilemma encountered in the application of administrative guidance cases in judicial practice is only a microcosm of the development of case guidance system. The root of the problem lies in the system established in "stipulation". The study of administrative case guidance system can not only improve administrative litigation and improve the efficiency of administrative cases, but also have an important impact on the future development of our country's case guidance system. The study of the system of administrative case guidance must not ignore the system of case guidance established in stipulation. Only by grasping the content and system of "stipulation", can we put forward some practical suggestions for the administrative case guidance system. Due to the fact that the guiding system of administrative cases in our country is still in the early stage of development, it is one of the ways to perfect the system by drawing lessons from the development experience of the system of extraterritorial administrative precedents. When summarizing the difficult problems in the judicial practice of administrative guidance cases in our country, this paper summarizes the application of administrative guidance cases in the past six years, and concludes that its effectiveness is not clear, its quantity is insufficient, it is quoted less, and the local differences are also summarized. The safeguard mechanism is not perfect and so on. In general, the administrative guidance cases in the selection mechanism, the application of security mechanisms, effectiveness disputes and other problems. Finally, according to the current situation and problems of administrative guidance cases, combined with our country's specific judicial practice, this paper probes into the countermeasures to perfect our country's administrative case guidance system. In the aspect of effectiveness, the author mainly hopes to reach the consensus of determining the effectiveness of administrative guidance cases by perfecting the applicable safeguard mechanism, and through a wide range of judicial practice. In the selection mechanism, the article mainly proposes to expand the main body of publication, that is, to allow the higher people's court to issue administrative guidance cases, and to establish a special selection committee of administrative guidance cases. In the perfection of the applicable safeguard mechanism, the author mainly discusses from three angles: the professional training of legal workers, the guiding case quoting mechanism, and the administrative case deviating from the reporting mechanism. In general, the development of the administrative case guidance system is not optimistic. To answer the problems encountered in the judicial practice of administrative guidance cases is not only related to the exertion of its guiding value. The development of our country's overall case guidance system will have an important impact.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 孫光寧;;反思指導性案例的援引方式——以《〈關于案例指導工作的規(guī)定〉實施細則》為分析對象[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2016年04期

2 趙靜波;;行政案例指導制度轉型的法理分析[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2016年04期

3 郭鋒;吳光俠;李兵;;《〈關于案例指導工作的規(guī)定〉實施細則》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2015年17期

4 張弘;于虹;;對統(tǒng)一公法學理論的質疑與反思[J];東方法學;2013年03期

5 陳興良;;案例指導制度的規(guī)范考察[J];法學評論;2012年03期

6 陳興良;;案例指導制度的法理考察[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2012年03期

7 湛中樂;;論行政訴訟案例指導制度[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2012年01期

8 王利明;;我國案例指導制度若干問題研究[J];法學;2012年01期

9 胡敏潔;;行政指導性案例的實踐困境與路徑選擇[J];法學;2012年01期

10 吳英姿;;案例指導制度能走多遠?[J];蘇州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2011年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 石明;行政案例指導制度研究[D];蘭州大學;2016年

2 尹健;我國行政案例指導制度完善研究[D];山東大學;2013年

，

本文編號：2325288