【摘要】：2010年,《關(guān)于案例指導(dǎo)工作的規(guī)定》的出臺(tái),標(biāo)志著案例指導(dǎo)制度的正式形成。行政案例指導(dǎo)制度作為該制度的重要構(gòu)成部分,其承載著案例指導(dǎo)制度一般性的基礎(chǔ)理論。但是,指導(dǎo)性案例在行政、刑事、民事等領(lǐng)域面臨的難題有所差異。行政指導(dǎo)性案例在司法實(shí)踐應(yīng)用中所遇到的困境不過是案例指導(dǎo)制度發(fā)展的縮影,問題的根源就在于《規(guī)定》中建立起的體系。研究行政案例指導(dǎo)制度不僅可以改善行政訴訟,提高行政案件審判效率,對于我國案例指導(dǎo)制度的未來發(fā)展也將產(chǎn)生重要影響。研究行政案例指導(dǎo)制度必然不可忽視《規(guī)定》中所建構(gòu)起的案例指導(dǎo)制度的體系。系統(tǒng)的把握《規(guī)定》中的內(nèi)容和體系,才能夠更好的針對行政案例指導(dǎo)制度提出一些切實(shí)可行的建議。礙于我國行政案例指導(dǎo)制度尚處于發(fā)展的初期,因此,借鑒域外行政判例制度的發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)不失為完善該套制度的途徑之一。文章在概括我國行政指導(dǎo)性案例司法實(shí)踐中的難題時(shí),通過總結(jié)近六年行政指導(dǎo)性案例的適用情況,概括出其效力不明確、數(shù)量不足、援引少、地方差異性、保障機(jī)制不健全等問題�？偟膩碇v,也就是行政指導(dǎo)性案例在遴選機(jī)制、適用保障機(jī)制、效力爭議等方面存在的問題。文章在最后,依據(jù)行政指導(dǎo)性案例的適用現(xiàn)狀和問題,結(jié)合我國的具體司法實(shí)踐,探討了完善我國行政案例指導(dǎo)制度的對策。在效力層面,筆者主要希望通過完善適用保障機(jī)制,加之以硬性的規(guī)定,通過廣泛大量的司法實(shí)踐,從而達(dá)成確定行政指導(dǎo)性案例效力的共識(shí)。在遴選機(jī)制上,文章主要提出了擴(kuò)大發(fā)布主體,也就是允許高級人民法院發(fā)布行政指導(dǎo)性案例,建立專門的行政指導(dǎo)性案例遴選委員會(huì)。在適用保障機(jī)制的完善中,主要從法律工作者的職業(yè)培訓(xùn)、指導(dǎo)性案例引用機(jī)制、行政案例背離報(bào)告機(jī)制三個(gè)角度展開了論述。總的來看,行政案例指導(dǎo)制度的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r不容樂觀,回答行政指導(dǎo)性案例在司法實(shí)踐中遇到的難題,不僅關(guān)系到其指導(dǎo)性價(jià)值的發(fā)揮,對于我國整體案例指導(dǎo)制度的發(fā)展都將產(chǎn)生重要影響。
[Abstract]:In 2010, the introduction of the provisions on case guidance marked the formal formation of the case guidance system. As an important part of the system, the administrative case guidance system bears the general basic theory of the case guidance system. However, the guiding cases in the administrative, criminal, civil and other areas faced with different problems. The dilemma encountered in the application of administrative guidance cases in judicial practice is only a microcosm of the development of case guidance system. The root of the problem lies in the system established in "stipulation". The study of administrative case guidance system can not only improve administrative litigation and improve the efficiency of administrative cases, but also have an important impact on the future development of our country's case guidance system. The study of the system of administrative case guidance must not ignore the system of case guidance established in stipulation. Only by grasping the content and system of "stipulation", can we put forward some practical suggestions for the administrative case guidance system. Due to the fact that the guiding system of administrative cases in our country is still in the early stage of development, it is one of the ways to perfect the system by drawing lessons from the development experience of the system of extraterritorial administrative precedents. When summarizing the difficult problems in the judicial practice of administrative guidance cases in our country, this paper summarizes the application of administrative guidance cases in the past six years, and concludes that its effectiveness is not clear, its quantity is insufficient, it is quoted less, and the local differences are also summarized. The safeguard mechanism is not perfect and so on. In general, the administrative guidance cases in the selection mechanism, the application of security mechanisms, effectiveness disputes and other problems. Finally, according to the current situation and problems of administrative guidance cases, combined with our country's specific judicial practice, this paper probes into the countermeasures to perfect our country's administrative case guidance system. In the aspect of effectiveness, the author mainly hopes to reach the consensus of determining the effectiveness of administrative guidance cases by perfecting the applicable safeguard mechanism, and through a wide range of judicial practice. In the selection mechanism, the article mainly proposes to expand the main body of publication, that is, to allow the higher people's court to issue administrative guidance cases, and to establish a special selection committee of administrative guidance cases. In the perfection of the applicable safeguard mechanism, the author mainly discusses from three angles: the professional training of legal workers, the guiding case quoting mechanism, and the administrative case deviating from the reporting mechanism. In general, the development of the administrative case guidance system is not optimistic. To answer the problems encountered in the judicial practice of administrative guidance cases is not only related to the exertion of its guiding value. The development of our country's overall case guidance system will have an important impact.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫光寧;;反思指導(dǎo)性案例的援引方式——以《〈關(guān)于案例指導(dǎo)工作的規(guī)定〉實(shí)施細(xì)則》為分析對象[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2016年04期

2 趙靜波;;行政案例指導(dǎo)制度轉(zhuǎn)型的法理分析[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

3 郭鋒;吳光俠;李兵;;《〈關(guān)于案例指導(dǎo)工作的規(guī)定〉實(shí)施細(xì)則》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2015年17期

4 張弘;于虹;;對統(tǒng)一公法學(xué)理論的質(zhì)疑與反思[J];東方法學(xué);2013年03期

5 陳興良;;案例指導(dǎo)制度的規(guī)范考察[J];法學(xué)評論;2012年03期

6 陳興良;;案例指導(dǎo)制度的法理考察[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2012年03期

7 湛中樂;;論行政訴訟案例指導(dǎo)制度[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

8 王利明;;我國案例指導(dǎo)制度若干問題研究[J];法學(xué);2012年01期

9 胡敏潔;;行政指導(dǎo)性案例的實(shí)踐困境與路徑選擇[J];法學(xué);2012年01期

10 吳英姿;;案例指導(dǎo)制度能走多遠(yuǎn)?[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 石明;行政案例指導(dǎo)制度研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

2 尹健;我國行政案例指導(dǎo)制度完善研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2325288