發(fā)布時間：2018-11-08 13:34

【摘要】：隨著社會財富的積累獲得了飛躍式的增長,中國公益事業(yè)進入蓬勃發(fā)展的新時期。承襲中華民族自古以來熱情仁愛、樂善好施的慈善思想,加上數(shù)次大災(zāi)為契機,新時代的公益事業(yè)不再是冷門,民眾以捐贈作為參與公益事業(yè)的方式,加入到該行列中。公益捐贈行為主體的增多及其受眾的廣泛,使該項行為具備普遍性。在其發(fā)揮第三部門彌合社會階層分化、支援弱勢群體、彰顯自身價值的正面作用時,也產(chǎn)生不少引人關(guān)注的不道德行為,本文所探討的公益詐捐行為即是其中之一。 公益詐捐行為,不僅違背社會道德,更為法律所不容。隨著公益詐捐行為的增多及其影響的擴大,以法律對之進行規(guī)制,從而凈化公益環(huán)境實屬必要。然目前我國對該行為定義、類型、性質(zhì)等基礎(chǔ)內(nèi)容均未予以權(quán)威立法,由此產(chǎn)生實踐中認(rèn)定的混亂,對相對人合法利益的保護也可謂不力。學(xué)術(shù)界對該行為的分析較為稀少,且討論并未形成統(tǒng)一結(jié)論。基于此,筆者擇取該論題進行分析。本文分為四部分進行論述。 第一章作為全文的基礎(chǔ),通過對已有觀點的分析及相關(guān)概念的區(qū)分,對公益詐捐下定義；并以現(xiàn)有案例為基礎(chǔ)對公益詐捐類型進行總結(jié)歸納；同時對其性質(zhì)稍有提及,為下文做鋪墊。 第二章為公益詐捐行為的理論分析,公益詐捐乃為違約行為,此章對合同的成立及性質(zhì)、詐捐人違反的合同義務(wù)、詐捐行為損害的利益及詐捐人的責(zé)任承擔(dān)均有討論。 第三章對我國目前有關(guān)公益詐捐的立法、實踐及其問題進行分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出解決問題的對策,以期對規(guī)制公益詐捐的實務(wù)有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the accumulation of social wealth, China's public welfare has entered a new period of vigorous development. Inherited from the Chinese nation since ancient times, benevolence, charity, plus a number of major disasters as an opportunity, the new era of public welfare is no longer a cold door, the public donations as a way to participate in the public service, joined the ranks. The increase of the behavior subject and the wide audience make the behavior universal. When it exerts the third sector to bridge the social stratum differentiation, supports the vulnerable group, shows the positive function of its own value, also produces many attractive immoral behavior, this article discusses the public welfare fraud donation behavior is one of them. The behavior of charitable fraud is not only against social morality, but also against the law. With the increase of the behavior of public welfare fraud and the expansion of its influence, it is necessary to regulate it by law so as to purify the public welfare environment. However, at present, the definition, type, nature and other basic contents of the act have not been given authoritative legislation in our country, resulting in confusion in practice, and the protection of the legitimate interests of the relative person can be said to be inadequate. The academic analysis of this behavior is rare, and the discussion has not reached a unified conclusion. Based on this, the author selected the topic for analysis. This article is divided into four parts to discuss. The first chapter is the basis of the full text, through the analysis of the existing views and the distinction of related concepts, the definition of public interest fraud, and the existing cases as the basis of the summary of the types of public interest fraud; At the same time, the nature of the slightly mentioned, for the following do pave the way. The second chapter is the theoretical analysis of the behavior of public welfare fraud, which is a breach of contract. This chapter discusses the formation and nature of the contract, the contractual obligations of the fraudulent donor, the damage to the benefit of the fraudulent donation act and the liability of the fraudulent donor. The third chapter analyzes the legislation, practice and problems of public welfare fraud in our country, and puts forward some countermeasures to solve the problem, in the hope of regulating the practice of public welfare fraud.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.182.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊立新;朱巍;;論戲謔行為及其民事法律后果——兼論戲謔行為與懸賞廣告的區(qū)別[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年03期

2 嚴(yán)存生;法之合理性問題──麥考密克與韋伯之比較[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1995年04期

3 田韶華,樊鴻雁;論機會喪失的損害賠償[J];法商研究;2005年04期

4 宋海洋;社會捐贈剩余的法律評析[J];法學(xué);2003年03期

5 胡建淼,邢益精;公共利益概念透析[J];法學(xué);2004年10期

6 李曉麗;楊帥;;《公益事業(yè)捐贈法》在中國實施陷入困境原因探析[J];法制與社會;2007年11期

7 張爍;;紅十字會在“詐捐門”中的法律責(zé)任[J];法制與社會;2010年05期

8 陳靜;;從“詐捐門”看我國慈善立法的缺位[J];法制與社會;2010年09期

9 劉滔滔;;違約之訴中可期待利益的法律保護[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2012年10期

10 韓波;;公益訴訟制度的力量組合[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年01期

，

本文編號：2318649