【摘要】：中國(guó)是一個(gè)傳統(tǒng)的農(nóng)業(yè)大國(guó),農(nóng)民、農(nóng)業(yè)和農(nóng)村問題一直是國(guó)家長(zhǎng)期致力于解決的至關(guān)重要的問題。尤其是黨的十八大以來(lái),黨中央明確提出,全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó),推進(jìn)科學(xué)立法、嚴(yán)格執(zhí)法、公正司法、全民守法,保證有法必依、執(zhí)法必嚴(yán)、違法必究�？梢哉f(shuō),依法治國(guó)已經(jīng)成為當(dāng)今中國(guó)最為重要的戰(zhàn)略之一。而在當(dāng)今中國(guó),雖然,由于城市化進(jìn)程不斷推進(jìn),大批農(nóng)業(yè)人口落戶城鎮(zhèn),城市化水平得到了顯著提升。但是,我們不得不承認(rèn),農(nóng)業(yè)人口在當(dāng)前仍是我國(guó)人口的主力軍,是我們?cè)谝婪ㄖ螄?guó)進(jìn)程中不可忽視的關(guān)鍵群體,他們的法治意識(shí)還相處于相對(duì)落后的狀態(tài),與全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó)的要求還有很多不相適應(yīng)。依法治國(guó)需要頂層設(shè)計(jì),同時(shí)也需要末端治理,而依法治村正是依法治國(guó)戰(zhàn)略在基層的具體實(shí)踐,可以說(shuō),沒有中國(guó)農(nóng)村的法治化,就沒有整個(gè)中國(guó)的法治化。因此,依法治村效果的好壞與否,對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)全面依法治國(guó)戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)具有極為關(guān)鍵的作用。與國(guó)內(nèi)許多農(nóng)村尤其是西部貧困地區(qū)農(nóng)村一樣,宣漢縣洋烈新村在推進(jìn)依法治村初期也面臨著許多困境:農(nóng)民自身素質(zhì)怎樣才能與依法治村相適應(yīng)?農(nóng)民參與依法治村的意識(shí)和積極性怎樣才能進(jìn)一步激發(fā)?開展依法治村的軟環(huán)境是否成熟?等等等等。作為整體搬遷重建的新農(nóng)村,如何厘清村規(guī)民約、理順管理機(jī)制,對(duì)于洋烈新村顯得尤為重要。在此背景下,通過多方努力,洋烈人探索出了一條依法治村的有效路徑,即“253”模式,該模式既有針對(duì)性,也有普遍性,通過近幾年的實(shí)踐,洋烈新村經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)快速發(fā)展,成功創(chuàng)建了國(guó)家4A級(jí)景區(qū),村民普遍過上了安居樂業(yè)的生活,實(shí)現(xiàn)了由災(zāi)區(qū)變景區(qū)、家園變花園的歷史性轉(zhuǎn)變,洋烈新村由此享有“川東第一村”的美譽(yù)。長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),我國(guó)理論界對(duì)依法治村關(guān)注不多,成果較少,已有的理論探討也缺乏實(shí)證分析。本文試圖以公共管理的視角,從宣漢縣洋烈新村依法治村這一案例入手,在參閱大量文獻(xiàn)和實(shí)地調(diào)查的基礎(chǔ)上,以點(diǎn)帶面,對(duì)我國(guó)依法治村現(xiàn)狀與難點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析,進(jìn)而提出進(jìn)一步提升我國(guó)基層治理中依法治村水平的種種構(gòu)想,希望以我淺薄的認(rèn)識(shí),拋磚引玉,引起更多人關(guān)注這一重大問題的研究,為實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)依法治國(guó)戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)添磚加瓦。
[Abstract]:China is a large traditional agricultural country. Farmers, agriculture and rural issues have always been crucial issues that the state has been committed to solving for a long time. It can be said that administering the country according to law has become one of the most important strategies in today's China. In today's China, although a large number of agricultural people have settled in cities and towns due to the continuous progress of urbanization, the level of urbanization has been significantly improved. In the process of governing the country by law, the key groups can not be ignored. Their consciousness of governing the country by law is still in a relatively backward state, which is incompatible with the requirement of promoting governing the country by law in an all-round way. Therefore, the effect of managing villages according to law is crucial to the realization of the strategic goal of managing the country in an all-round way. Like many rural areas in China, especially those in the poor western areas, the Yanglie New Village in Xuanhan County is also facing the challenge of promoting the rule of law in the early stage. There are many dilemmas: how can the quality of the peasants adapt to the rule of law? How can the consciousness and enthusiasm of the peasants to participate in the rule of law be further stimulated? Is the soft environment for the rule of law mature? And so on. as a whole relocation and reconstruction of the new countryside, how to clarify the village rules and regulations, straighten out the management mechanism, for the Yanglie New Village In this context, through various efforts, the foreign martyrs have explored an effective way to rule the village by law, namely the "253" model, which is both targeted and universal. Through the practice of recent years, the economic and social development of Yanglie New Village has developed rapidly, and the national 4A scenic spot has been successfully established, and the villagers have generally lived and worked in peace and contentment. Yanglie New Village enjoys the reputation of "the first village in eastern Sichuan" because of its historic transformation from disaster area to scenic spot and home to garden. For a long time, the theoretical circles in China have paid little attention to the rule of law and achieved little, and the existing theoretical discussion is also lack of empirical analysis. Beginning with the case of village governing by law, on the basis of consulting a large number of documents and on-the-spot investigation, this paper analyzes the present situation and difficulties of village governing by law in China, and then puts forward various ideas for further improving the level of village governing by law in grass-roots governance in China. I hope that with my shallow understanding, I can draw more attention to this heavy burden. The study of big problems will contribute to the realization of the strategic goal of ruling the country according to law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1;D422.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙愛華;;把農(nóng)村管理納入法制軌道 建設(shè)法治農(nóng)村[J];智富時(shí)代;2015年06期

2 李格;;論依法治國(guó)理念下的依法治村[J];法制博覽;2015年13期

3 宋心然;;依法治國(guó)與治理能力現(xiàn)代化的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];中共貴州省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

4 白利寅;;全面強(qiáng)化民生建設(shè)的法治保障[J];理論探索;2014年01期

5 謝平;;政府行為模式轉(zhuǎn)換與依法治村的推進(jìn)——綏濱縣農(nóng)村居民法律素養(yǎng)調(diào)查分析和思考[J];奮斗;2013年06期

6 宋震;黃如寶;;我國(guó)政府投資項(xiàng)目管理方式的制度變遷[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年04期

7 陳粲元;;當(dāng)前我國(guó)村委會(huì)選舉問題研究[J];菏澤學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

8 高聰穎;;地方政府的治道變革:國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)與中國(guó)借鑒——以英國(guó)“燈塔地方政府計(jì)劃”為例[J];天津行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

9 李翠芳;;韓非“法治”思想在管理中的應(yīng)用[J];科技資訊;2011年04期

10 房亞群;;淺析當(dāng)前依法治村的問題及對(duì)策[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年18期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 朱海就;;經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展必須要有法治的約束[N];深圳特區(qū)報(bào);2014年

2 劉佳;;村規(guī)民約下的鄉(xiāng)村治理方式轉(zhuǎn)變[N];四川日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 陶玲;社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村法治建設(shè)的困境及對(duì)策研究[D];太原科技大學(xué);2014年

2 楊燦;新農(nóng)村法治建設(shè)存在的問題及對(duì)策研究[D];西南大學(xué);2014年

3 歐陽(yáng)檢軍;農(nóng)村社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型中法治建設(shè)的困境及其對(duì)策[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2007年

4 李桂枝;當(dāng)代中國(guó)農(nóng)村法治缺失及對(duì)策研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2006年

5 王文東;我國(guó)農(nóng)村法治的現(xiàn)狀與思考[D];東南大學(xué);2005年

6 斯欽;中國(guó)農(nóng)村法治的現(xiàn)狀與趨勢(shì)[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2004年

7 陳雄;中國(guó)農(nóng)村法治建設(shè)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：2216595