【摘要】：責任政府理論的產(chǎn)生是西方民主政治的結果,西方各國也將構建責任政府作為其政府改革運動的其中一個目標,其與行政問責法律制度的運作有著緊密的聯(lián)系,它的建成是需要行政問責法律制度來保障的,因此,在責任政府視閾下研究行政問責法律制度意義重大。在責任政府理論研究的帶動下,西方行政問責法律制度發(fā)展比較早,體系也相對比較健全;我國行政問責法律制度則起步較晚,最早可追溯至1979年的“渤海2號”沉船事件中的問責處分決定,直到2003年的“非典”危機才促使我國行政問責法律制度的正式建立。在十年的時間里,我國行政問責法律制度發(fā)展是取得了一定的成績的:從中央到地方與行政問責相關的法律法規(guī)陸續(xù)出臺、在實際操作中一波波的問責“風暴”不斷的充斥著人們的眼球等等,都對我國責任政府的建設起到了積極的作用。盡管如此,行政問責法律制度在我國仍然屬于舶來品,還不夠完善,因此,在責任政府視閾下完善我國行政問責法律制度是一個十分重要的課題。本文正是在責任政府理論指導下,基于憲法學與行政法學視角,綜合運用文獻分析法、比較分析法、實事求是的研究方法來展開對我國行政問責法律制度的研究。首先,通過對西方責任政府理論的發(fā)展過程及其內涵的梳理并在其理論指導下對行政問責法律制度作了界定,即認為行政問責法律制度是指各個問責主體根據(jù)相關法律法規(guī)的規(guī)定對國家機關及其工作人員的違法或不當行為啟動責任追究程序的法律制度的總稱,同時探究了行政問責法律制度的法理基礎及其與責任政府的內在關系。其次,通過對國外幾個發(fā)達國家及我國香港地區(qū)責任政府理念下行政問責法律制度發(fā)展概況的比較研究,總結出經(jīng)驗,以期對我國大陸地區(qū)行政問責法律制度研究做出借鑒。再次,對我國大陸地區(qū)行政問責法律制度的發(fā)展困境和原因進行了分析,認為我國目前行政問責法律制度存在各地方政府規(guī)定混亂,問責條件開啟缺乏剛性、異體問責主體力量不足、問責標準及程序規(guī)定不一、救濟途徑規(guī)定不完善的問題。最后,根據(jù)現(xiàn)實問題,在責任政府視閾下,提出了從統(tǒng)一我國行政問責立法依據(jù)、構建多元的問責啟動模式、建立科學的行政問責程序制度、增加行政問責救濟途徑四個大的方面來完善我國行政問責法律制度的對策建議,力求切實可行。
[Abstract]:The emergence of the theory of responsible government is the result of western democratic politics. Western countries also regard the construction of responsible government as one of the objectives of their government reform movement, which is closely related to the operation of the legal system of administrative accountability. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the legal system of administrative accountability from the perspective of responsible government. Driven by the theoretical study of the responsible government, the western legal system of administrative accountability developed earlier and the system was relatively sound, while the legal system of administrative accountability in our country started relatively late. As far back as 1979, the decision of accountability in the case of "Bohai Sea No.2" shipwreck was decided. It was not until the "SARS" crisis in 2003 that the legal system of administrative accountability in China was formally established. In the past ten years, the development of China's administrative accountability legal system has made certain achievements: from the central to local governments and administrative accountability related laws and regulations have been issued one after another. In practice, a wave of accountability "storm" is constantly filled with people's eyes and so on, which has played a positive role in the construction of our responsible government. In spite of this, the legal system of administrative accountability is still foreign in our country, and it is not perfect enough. Therefore, it is a very important subject to perfect the legal system of administrative accountability in the view of responsible government. Under the guidance of the theory of responsible government, based on the perspective of constitutional jurisprudence and administrative jurisprudence, this paper comprehensively applies literature analysis, comparative analysis and practical and realistic research methods to carry out the research on the legal system of administrative accountability in China. First of all, it defines the legal system of administrative accountability by combing the development process and connotation of the western theory of responsible government and under the guidance of its theory. That is to say, the legal system of administrative accountability refers to the general name of the legal system in which each subject of accountability initiates the process of accountability for the illegal or improper conduct of state organs and their staff in accordance with the provisions of relevant laws and regulations. At the same time, it probes into the legal basis of the legal system of administrative accountability and its internal relationship with the responsible government. Secondly, through the comparative study of the development of the administrative accountability legal system under the concept of responsibility government in several developed countries and Hong Kong, the author summarizes the experience in order to make reference to the study of the administrative accountability legal system in the mainland of China. Thirdly, the paper analyzes the difficulties and causes of the development of the administrative accountability legal system in mainland China, and concludes that there is confusion in the local government regulations and the lack of rigidity in the opening of the accountability conditions in the current legal system of administrative accountability in China. The power of allogeneic accountability subjects is insufficient, the standards and procedures of accountability are different, and the remedies are not perfect. Finally, according to the practical problems, from the perspective of the responsible government, this paper puts forward a scientific administrative accountability procedure system by unifying the legislative basis of administrative accountability in our country, building a pluralistic starting mode of accountability, and establishing a scientific administrative accountability procedure system. To improve the legal system of administrative accountability in four aspects, we should try our best to improve the legal system of administrative accountability.
【學位授予單位】：中共重慶市委黨校
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.11

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 王占玨;;對被問責官員復出現(xiàn)象的幾點認識[J];吉林廣播電視大學學報;2013年08期

2 伍洪杏;劉燦;;淺析公民參與問責的困境與出路[J];湖南商學院學報;2010年01期

3 徐信貴;;食品安全監(jiān)管中存在的權責問題及其化解方式[J];理論探索;2014年04期

4 雷正;;暴雨過后的法律思考[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2012年15期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 覃譯徵;責任政府視閾下我國行政問責法律制度研究[D];中共重慶市委黨校;2014年

，

本文編號：2204724