本文選題：域名爭(zhēng)議 + 規(guī)則比較�。� 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近些年隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展，域名技術(shù)也已經(jīng)運(yùn)用到更為廣闊的空間�！吨袊�(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)域名管理辦法》對(duì)域名定義是：“域名是互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)上識(shí)別和定位計(jì)算機(jī)的層次結(jié)構(gòu)式的字符表示，與該計(jì)算機(jī)的互聯(lián)網(wǎng)協(xié)議（IP）地址相對(duì)應(yīng)。中文域名是含有中文文字的域名”按照目前實(shí)務(wù)界的通說(shuō)，域名產(chǎn)生的目的是為了便于普通訪問(wèn)者的記憶及訪問(wèn)。但因?yàn)榫�上域名具有稀缺性、排他性、標(biāo)識(shí)性等特點(diǎn)，容易與線下商標(biāo)、商號(hào)等傳統(tǒng)民事權(quán)利發(fā)生沖突和爭(zhēng)議。當(dāng)兩者發(fā)生沖突時(shí)如何解決？域名投訴人與域名持有人發(fā)生爭(zhēng)議時(shí)如何解決？這是一個(gè)關(guān)系到各方利益的重大問(wèn)題。域名和商標(biāo)、商號(hào)等是分屬不同體系下的概念，傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)重視對(duì)商標(biāo)權(quán)、商號(hào)權(quán)等民事權(quán)益的保護(hù)，而在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域也要注意到網(wǎng)絡(luò)自身特點(diǎn)的保護(hù)。于是針對(duì)各類(lèi)涉及域名歸屬的糾紛，按照域名不同等級(jí)劃分可分為不同的糾紛解決機(jī)制，目前主流解決規(guī)則是分為：1、統(tǒng)一域名裁決規(guī)則（UDRP）；2、中國(guó)域名裁決規(guī)則（CNDRP）。這兩種域名裁決機(jī)制存在許多共同點(diǎn)，也存在各自不同點(diǎn)，，在具體的案例適用中也可能產(chǎn)生截然相反的結(jié)果。筆者嘗試分析其規(guī)則特點(diǎn)，結(jié)合具體實(shí)務(wù)案例進(jìn)行分析，并匯總域名爭(zhēng)議實(shí)務(wù)界的主流觀點(diǎn)，對(duì)UDRP規(guī)則及CNDRP規(guī)則進(jìn)行對(duì)比，同時(shí)著重具體分析CNDRP的程序性及實(shí)體性規(guī)則，并對(duì)我國(guó)域名爭(zhēng)議解決規(guī)則的完善提出一些建議。 本文共分為以下四部分： 第一部分是對(duì)域名理論簡(jiǎn)要介紹，主要介紹了域名產(chǎn)生的背景淵源、域名的結(jié)構(gòu)特點(diǎn)。 第二部分對(duì)域名爭(zhēng)議產(chǎn)生的原因及域名爭(zhēng)議的主要表現(xiàn)形式進(jìn)行闡述。 第三部分對(duì)國(guó)際上兩個(gè)主流的域名爭(zhēng)議解決機(jī)制（UDRP與CNDRP）從各自形成背景、主要特點(diǎn)，以及具體規(guī)則進(jìn)行多方面的比較對(duì)比。 第四部分專(zhuān)門(mén)針對(duì)我國(guó)域名爭(zhēng)議解決專(zhuān)有機(jī)制實(shí)踐問(wèn)題探討，分別從制度的程序性問(wèn)題和實(shí)體性問(wèn)題兩方面進(jìn)行探討，并對(duì)我國(guó)域名爭(zhēng)議解決專(zhuān)有機(jī)制的完善提出幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the further development of Internet technology, Domain name technology has also been applied to a wider space. The Chinese Internet Domain name Management method defines domain name as: "Domain name is a hierarchical character representation for identifying and locating computers on the Internet." Corresponds to the IP address of the computer. Chinese domain name is a domain name with Chinese characters. However, the online domain name is characterized by scarcity, exclusiveness, marking, and so on, which conflicts and disputes with traditional civil rights such as offline trademark and trade name. How to resolve the conflict when there is a conflict between the two? How to resolve the dispute between domain name complainant and domain name holder? This is a major issue related to the interests of all parties. Domain name, trademark, trade name are different concepts under different systems. The traditional society attaches importance to the protection of civil rights and interests, such as trademark rights, trade name rights and so on, but in the field of Internet, we should also pay attention to the protection of the characteristics of the network itself. As a result, according to different grades of domain name, it can be divided into different dispute resolution mechanisms for various disputes involving domain name ownership. At present, the mainstream settlement rules are divided into one: one, the unified domain name adjudication rule is UDRP/ 2, and the Chinese domain name adjudication rule is CNDRPU. There are many similarities and differences between these two kinds of domain name adjudication mechanisms, which may produce opposite results in specific cases. The author tries to analyze the characteristics of the rules, combined with specific practical cases to analyze, and summarizes the mainstream views of domain name disputes, compares the UDRP rules with the CNDRP rules, and focuses on the specific analysis of the procedural and substantive rules of CNDRP. And put forward some suggestions to perfect the rules of domain name dispute settlement in our country. This paper is divided into the following four parts: The first part is a brief introduction to the domain name theory, mainly introduces the background origin of domain name, the structure characteristic of domain name. The second part expounds the causes of domain name disputes and the main forms of domain name disputes. The third part compares UDRP and CNDRP from their background, main characteristics and specific rules. The fourth part is devoted to the practice of domain name dispute resolution mechanism in China, from the procedural and substantive aspects of the system, and put forward some suggestions for the perfection of the proprietary domain name dispute resolution mechanism in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮娜;域名注冊(cè)糾紛的法律問(wèn)題[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年05期

2 周清華,強(qiáng)兆楓;對(duì)域名問(wèn)題的法律思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年12期

3 李智;;國(guó)內(nèi)域名爭(zhēng)議解決之法律問(wèn)題[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

4 唐永忠,邵培樟;域名搶注糾紛解決機(jī)制及其完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年03期

5 謝冠斌;從域名的法律保護(hù)看知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

6 吳成娟;;論域名糾紛及其解決機(jī)制[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年S1期

7 郭丹;王偉;;論我國(guó)域名保護(hù)法律機(jī)制的完善——兼評(píng)《中國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息中心域名爭(zhēng)議解決辦法》[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2007年12期

8 商建剛;;論UDRP域名爭(zhēng)議解決機(jī)制的特點(diǎn)及法律屬性[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(中旬刊);2012年03期

9 阿拉木斯;淺議有關(guān)域名的法律問(wèn)題[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);1998年02期

10 鄭璇玉;域名案件中的惡意概念分析[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年03期

本文編號(hào)：1987219