發(fā)布時間：2018-06-04 16:20

  本文選題：城市綜合行政執(zhí)法 + 既存問題��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：城市綜合行政執(zhí)法是指城市管理行政執(zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)在城市治理領(lǐng)域統(tǒng)一行使相對集中的行政處罰權(quán),原有關(guān)機(jī)關(guān)不得再行使已經(jīng)集中統(tǒng)一行使的那部分行政處罰權(quán)的綜合行政執(zhí)法行為。自城市綜合行政執(zhí)法制度建立以來,在城市管理領(lǐng)域起了很大的作用。然而,城市綜合行政執(zhí)法制度存在許多問題,主要表現(xiàn)在暴力執(zhí)法、城市綜合行政執(zhí)法合法性和合理性、城市綜合行政執(zhí)法手段的不規(guī)范和城市綜合執(zhí)法的程序的不完善等問題成為我國城市執(zhí)法久治不愈的頑疾。目前,我國城市綜合行政執(zhí)法已經(jīng)具備立法的必要性和可行性。本文筆者從城市綜合行政執(zhí)法制度存在的問題為邏輯起點(diǎn),設(shè)法通過立法的方式規(guī)制城市綜合行政執(zhí)法,讓城市管理權(quán)在法律的牢籠里運(yùn)行。 首先,本文在緒論部分介紹了我國城市綜合行政執(zhí)法制度的研究意義、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀。該研究的意義在于,加強(qiáng)城市綜合行政執(zhí)法的法制建設(shè),有利于“中國夢”的實現(xiàn),有利于推進(jìn)我國依法行政的進(jìn)程,有利于保障人權(quán)。其次,正文第一部分是基礎(chǔ)理論的研究。在對國內(nèi)外相關(guān)理論研究的基礎(chǔ)上,歸納出我國城市綜合行政執(zhí)法的概念、特征、背景和執(zhí)法范圍。再者,正文第二部分主要分析當(dāng)前我國城市綜合行政執(zhí)法存在的問題,主要表現(xiàn)為暴力執(zhí)法、城市綜合行政執(zhí)法合法性和合理性、城市綜合行政執(zhí)法手段的不規(guī)范和城市綜合執(zhí)法的程序的不完善等問題。最后,立足實際并結(jié)合既存問題,對我國城市綜合行政執(zhí)法的立法路徑予以建議。即,我們應(yīng)該從立法理念、理順綜合行政執(zhí)法體制、執(zhí)法手段和方式、執(zhí)法程序等方面著手我國城市綜合行政執(zhí)法的立法工作。
[Abstract]:Urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement refers to the relatively centralized power of administrative punishment exercised by urban administrative law enforcement agencies in the field of urban governance. The former relevant organs may no longer exercise that part of the administrative punishment authority that has been centralized and uniformly exercised. Since the establishment of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement system, it has played a great role in the field of urban management. However, there are many problems in urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement system, which are mainly manifested in violent law enforcement, legitimacy and rationality of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement. The nonstandard means of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement and the imperfection of urban comprehensive law enforcement procedures have become a persistent problem of urban law enforcement in China for a long time. At present, our country city comprehensive administration law enforcement already has the legislative necessity and the feasibility. Starting from the problems existing in the system of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement, the author tries to regulate urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement by way of legislation, so that the right of urban management can run in the cage of law. First of all, this paper introduces the significance of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement system in China and the current research situation at home and abroad. The significance of this study is that strengthening the legal construction of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement is conducive to the realization of "Chinese Dream", to promoting the process of administration by law in our country, and to safeguarding human rights. Secondly, the first part of the text is the research of basic theory. On the basis of theoretical research at home and abroad, this paper summarizes the concept, characteristics, background and law enforcement scope of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement in China. Furthermore, the second part of the text mainly analyzes the problems existing in the current urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement in China, mainly manifested in the violent law enforcement, the legitimacy and rationality of the urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement. The problems such as the nonstandard means of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement and the imperfection of the procedure of urban comprehensive law enforcement are also discussed. Finally, based on reality and existing problems, the legislative path of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement in China is suggested. That is, we should start the legislative work of urban comprehensive administrative law enforcement in our country from the aspects of legislative idea, straightening out the comprehensive administrative law enforcement system, law enforcement means and methods, law enforcement procedure and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

2 上官丕亮;;究竟什么是生存權(quán)[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

3 王春業(yè);;論城管行政執(zhí)法隊伍形象的重塑[J];西部法學(xué)評論;2012年02期

4 李敦智;;規(guī)范性文件的概念及制度建設(shè)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2011年14期

5 葉曉川;;城管執(zhí)法權(quán)的制度困境及其出路[J];理論與改革;2008年03期

6 王洪芳;李錚;;城管執(zhí)法的權(quán)威與困惑[J];行政與法;2012年04期

，

本文編號：1978027