本文選題：行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行 + 公民權(quán)利　； 參考：《上海大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障研究尚未形成一個(gè)完整的理論體系，公民權(quán)利是否得到充分保障是一個(gè)社會(huì)文明程度的重要尺度，也是法制社會(huì)的一面鏡子。強(qiáng)制性作為國家權(quán)力的主要特征，在保障國家政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化順利進(jìn)行等方面起著重要的作用。適當(dāng)合理的行政強(qiáng)制權(quán)有利于實(shí)現(xiàn)正當(dāng)?shù)膰夷康�，有利于維護(hù)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定以及創(chuàng)造社會(huì)的和諧。但是隨著人們對(duì)人權(quán)保障的日益重視，加之我國目前行政強(qiáng)制權(quán)的濫用擴(kuò)張，導(dǎo)致公民權(quán)利遭到侵害的事件時(shí)有發(fā)生，嚴(yán)重影響了我國公民的權(quán)利。 本文以保障公民權(quán)利為出發(fā)點(diǎn)和歸宿點(diǎn)，發(fā)現(xiàn)問題解決問題，使公民權(quán)利在行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中得到切實(shí)的尊重與落實(shí)。文章第一部分對(duì)行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障的一般理論做了系統(tǒng)的分析，通過法學(xué)理論研究和相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的參考，對(duì)行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障的含義、理論基礎(chǔ)、意義以及其在《行政強(qiáng)制法》中的體現(xiàn)做了剖析，從而對(duì)行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障有一個(gè)系統(tǒng)的把握。文章的第二部分主要對(duì)我國行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了全面闡述。通過對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中案例的分析，指出了公民權(quán)利得不到切實(shí)保障的原因，為下文行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利的保障體系的構(gòu)建打下堅(jiān)實(shí)的實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)。文章第三部分運(yùn)用比較研究的方法，對(duì)國外行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障進(jìn)行了比較分析，從而分析國外是如何對(duì)公民權(quán)利進(jìn)行保護(hù)，，以期能“取其精華，去其糟粕”，根據(jù)我國的實(shí)際情況，取得對(duì)我國行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障的借鑒經(jīng)驗(yàn)。最后，對(duì)我國行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障提出具體完善對(duì)策，包括建立完善的行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行法律體系、完善《行政強(qiáng)制法》中的相關(guān)解釋和具體規(guī)定、完善行政強(qiáng)制程序規(guī)范，注重合法與公正、完善行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障的監(jiān)督體系、健全行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中公民權(quán)利保障的救濟(jì)制度。
[Abstract]:The research on the protection of civil rights in administrative enforcement has not yet formed a complete theoretical system. Whether the civil rights are fully protected is an important measure of the degree of social civilization and a mirror of the legal society. As the main feature of state power, compulsion plays an important role in ensuring the smooth progress of national politics, economy and culture. The proper and reasonable administrative compulsory right is conducive to the realization of the legitimate national purpose, the maintenance of social stability and the creation of social harmony. However, with the increasing attention to the protection of human rights, coupled with the abuse and expansion of administrative coercive power in our country, the civil rights have been violated from time to time, seriously affecting the rights of Chinese citizens. This article regards the protection of citizens' rights as the starting point and the destination, finds out the problem solving, and makes the civil rights be respected and implemented in the administrative enforcement. The first part of the article makes a systematic analysis of the general theory of the protection of civil rights in the administrative enforcement, through the theoretical research of law and reference of relevant literature, the meaning and theoretical basis of the protection of civil rights in the administrative enforcement. The meaning and its embodiment in the Administrative compulsory Law are analyzed so as to have a systematic grasp of the protection of the civil rights in the administrative enforcement. The second part of the article mainly describes the status quo of civil rights protection in administrative enforcement in China. Through the analysis of the cases in real life, this paper points out the reasons why the civil rights can not be effectively guaranteed, and lays a solid practical foundation for the construction of the civil rights guarantee system in the following administrative enforcement. In the third part, by using the method of comparative study, the author makes a comparative analysis on the protection of civil rights in foreign administrative enforcement, so as to analyze how to protect the civil rights in foreign countries, in order to "take the essence and discard the dross". According to the actual situation of our country, we can draw lessons from the protection of civil rights in the administrative enforcement of our country. Finally, the author puts forward concrete and perfect countermeasures for the protection of civil rights in the administrative enforcement, including establishing a perfect legal system of administrative enforcement, perfecting the relevant interpretations and specific provisions in the Administrative compulsory Law. We should perfect the standard of administrative compulsory procedure, pay attention to legality and justice, perfect the supervision system of civil rights guarantee in administrative enforcement, and perfect the relief system of civil rights guarantee in administrative enforcement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭貴才;;論城市房屋拆遷中公民私有財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年06期

2 肖澤晟;;論行政強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行中債權(quán)沖突的處理[J];法商研究;2011年03期

3 姜明安;;《行政強(qiáng)制法》的基本原則和行政強(qiáng)制設(shè)定權(quán)研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年11期

4 楊建順;;日本行政執(zhí)行制度研究[J];法學(xué)家;2002年04期

5 傅士成;;關(guān)于《行政強(qiáng)制法》三個(gè)問題的看法和主張[J];法學(xué)家;2006年03期

6 楊解君,葉樹理;關(guān)于行政強(qiáng)制若干理論觀點(diǎn)的批判[J];法學(xué);2000年08期

7 周安平;社會(huì)自治與國家公權(quán)[J];法學(xué);2002年10期

8 閔凡群;;在城市房屋強(qiáng)制拆遷中貫徹以人為本[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年09期

9 苗晶晶;;行政強(qiáng)制法的實(shí)踐難題與因應(yīng)之道[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年23期

10 王丹;;行政強(qiáng)制——人權(quán)保障與行政效率的博弈[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年22期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王達(dá);房屋征收拆遷制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1959134