本文選題：集體土地征收 + 征收范圍��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：集體土地征收補(bǔ)償范圍是土地征收制度改革中非常重要的問題。以往人們更為關(guān)注的問題是如何提高補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，然而補(bǔ)償范圍才是決定補(bǔ)償總額的基數(shù)，因此在提高補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的同時(shí)擴(kuò)大補(bǔ)償范圍方是對(duì)農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障最有利的方式。通過對(duì)集體土地征收的地方立法文本梳理和分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)其中存在的問題，從理論上探討補(bǔ)償范圍的基本范疇，，厘清征收范圍與補(bǔ)償范圍之間的關(guān)系，利益說與組織說對(duì)補(bǔ)償范圍的影響以及補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與補(bǔ)償范圍之間關(guān)系。進(jìn)而歸納出補(bǔ)償原則是前提、合法行政行為是基礎(chǔ)、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)補(bǔ)償是原則、損失范圍確定補(bǔ)償范圍等界定補(bǔ)償范圍的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在此基礎(chǔ)之上，從立法論的視角構(gòu)建補(bǔ)償范圍的基本結(jié)構(gòu)。補(bǔ)償范圍的立法模式應(yīng)當(dāng)采取折衷式的立法模式，具體內(nèi)容包括財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)損失和非財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)損失，財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)損失包括集體土地所有權(quán)、地上附著物所有權(quán)和依附于土地生成的他項(xiàng)權(quán)利；非財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)損失主要列舉了精神損失和生活權(quán)損失。最后，根據(jù)不同學(xué)者建議稿嘗試草擬相應(yīng)的補(bǔ)償范圍條款。
[Abstract]:The compensation scope of collective land expropriation is a very important issue in the reform of land expropriation system. In the past, people pay more attention to how to improve the compensation standard, however, the compensation range is the base of the total compensation, so increasing the compensation standard and expanding the compensation range is the most favorable way to guarantee the farmers' property rights. Through combing and analyzing the local legislative texts of collective land expropriation, the author finds out the existing problems, probes into the basic category of compensation scope theoretically, and clarifies the relationship between expropriation scope and compensation scope. The influence of interest theory and organization theory on compensation range and the relationship between compensation standard and compensation range. Then it concludes that the principle of compensation is the premise, the legal administrative act is the foundation, the compensation of property right is the principle, the scope of compensation is determined, and so on. On this basis, the basic structure of compensation scope is constructed from the perspective of legislation theory. The legislative model of compensation scope should adopt the eclectic legislative model, which includes the loss of property right and the loss of non-property right, and the loss of property right includes collective land ownership. The ownership of aboveground attachment and other rights that depend on the formation of land; the loss of non-property rights mainly enumerates the loss of spiritual loss and right of living. Finally, according to different scholars' suggestions, it tries to draft the corresponding compensation scope clause.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.3;D922.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭潔;土地征用補(bǔ)償法律問題探析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年08期

2 姜明安;行政補(bǔ)償制度研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年05期

3 鄒愛華;符啟林;;論土地征收的性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年05期

4 龍翼飛;楊一介;;土地征收初論[J];法學(xué)家;2000年06期

5 李傲,夏軍;試論我國(guó)行政補(bǔ)償制度[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年01期

6 朱廣新;;房屋征收補(bǔ)償范圍與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的思考[J];法學(xué);2011年05期

7 童航;;論集體土地征收補(bǔ)償范圍[J];福建法學(xué);2012年03期

8 申建平;;對(duì)農(nóng)村集體土地征收補(bǔ)償范圍的反思[J];比較法研究;2013年02期

9 張千帆;“公正補(bǔ)償”與征收權(quán)的憲法限制[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年02期

10 朱廣新;;地役權(quán)概念的體系性解讀[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年04期

本文編號(hào)：1957637