本文選題：聽證制度 + 公眾參與　； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在聽證過程中，公眾參與發(fā)揮著重要作用。參與式民主是一種表達(dá)民意的方式。它既是民眾訴求表達(dá)的途徑，也是公眾參與國家事務(wù)管理一種體現(xiàn)形式。參與式民主可以促進(jìn)公民個人及社會群體參與社會事務(wù)的積極性，已成為實(shí)現(xiàn)人民行使當(dāng)家作主權(quán)力的一種重要形式。本題所研究的聽證制度中的公眾參與，也是參與式民主的一部分。 公眾參與聽證過程是實(shí)現(xiàn)公民監(jiān)督政府的憲法權(quán)利、促進(jìn)政府由統(tǒng)治轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橹卫淼闹匾緩�，是人民�?dāng)家做主的實(shí)質(zhì)所在。近年來，隨著行政公開化的推動，我國在公眾參與聽證制度方面進(jìn)行了有益的探索，取得了一定的進(jìn)步。本文以我國在聽證制度下的公眾參與機(jī)制為研究對象，輔以美國和德國在聽證制度中公眾參與的現(xiàn)狀分析，探索完善公眾參與機(jī)制的途徑，尋求可行性方案，從而推動聽證制度下公眾參與的長足發(fā)展。為今后這一領(lǐng)域的相關(guān)法學(xué)研究提供了科學(xué)建議，這對于我國聽證制度的發(fā)展和公眾參與機(jī)制的建設(shè)，具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文采取比較研究和實(shí)證研究的方法，借鑒國內(nèi)外學(xué)者的已有研究成果和他國的具體實(shí)施規(guī)范，通過對實(shí)際案例的分析，，對我國如何完善公眾參與機(jī)制做了比較詳細(xì)的論述。以該課題下行政機(jī)構(gòu)任職人員對公眾參與的重視程度，對法律精神的貫徹，以及是否能夠引入第三方機(jī)構(gòu)對聽證制度下公眾參與過程做監(jiān)督為創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)，在文章第五部分關(guān)于解決當(dāng)下公眾參與聽證制度所存在的問題的措施中進(jìn)行了闡述。文章的大致結(jié)構(gòu)如下：首先在引言部分對選題理由做了說明。選擇這個題目的原因是在當(dāng)前社會中公眾參與社會事務(wù)的積極性越來越高，公民普遍的法律意識有了一定程度的提升，并且已經(jīng)懂得使用法律武器維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益這樣的社會大背景下，結(jié)合攻讀碩士學(xué)位階段所學(xué)行政法學(xué)的知識，萌發(fā)了對聽證制度下的公眾參與機(jī)制做研究的想法。文章的第二部分對聽證制度和公眾參與理論作了介紹。闡述了聽證制度的價值、程序內(nèi)容等，結(jié)合美國和我國一些學(xué)者對公眾參與理論的理解和釋義，說明了在聽證制度下增加公眾參與的必要性。第三部分列舉了美國和德國在聽證制度下公眾參與機(jī)制的實(shí)踐，結(jié)合這兩個國家公眾參與的案例，分別分析了兩國法律法規(guī)中對公眾參與理論的具體規(guī)定和表現(xiàn)，并總結(jié)了對我國聽證制度下完善公眾參與機(jī)制的啟示。在第四部分中指出了我國聽證制度中公眾參與機(jī)制存在的一些問題，例如公眾參與意識在整體水平上顯得比較薄弱，我國的法律法規(guī)并沒有明確規(guī)定公眾參與部分的內(nèi)容，現(xiàn)有的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)大多都是在實(shí)際工作中積累出來的，對于參加聽證的代表的資格審查和選拔標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不太具有規(guī)范性和科學(xué)性等問題。第五部分在第四部分分析問題的基礎(chǔ)上，論述了如何完善聽證制度中公眾參與機(jī)制并提出解決方案。在結(jié)語部分，對全文的中心內(nèi)容和筆者要表達(dá)的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。希望能夠?yàn)檫@一領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的法學(xué)研究盡綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:In the process of hearing, public participation plays an important role. Participatory democracy is a way of expressing public opinion. It is not only a way of expressing public opinion, but also a manifestation of public participation in the management of state affairs. Participatory democracy can promote the enthusiasm of citizens and social groups to participate in social affairs, and has become the realization of the people. The public participation in the hearing system studied in this thesis is also a part of participatory democracy.
The public participation in the hearing process is an important way to realize the constitutional right of the citizens to supervise the government and to promote the transformation of the government from rule to governance. It is the essence of the people's ownership. In recent years, with the promotion of administrative openness, our country has made beneficial exploration in the public participation in hearing system and made certain progress. This article is based on me The public participation mechanism under the hearing system is the research object, with the analysis of the status quo of the public participation in the hearing system of the United States and Germany, exploring the ways to improve the public participation mechanism and seeking the feasibility plan, thus promoting the rapid development of public participation under the hearing system. It provides a scientific research for the related legal research in this field. It is of great practical significance to the development of the hearing system and the construction of public participation mechanism in China.
In this paper, a comparative study and an empirical study are adopted to draw on the existing research results of domestic and foreign scholars and the specific implementation norms of other countries. Through the analysis of the actual cases, the paper makes a more detailed discussion on how to improve the public participation mechanism in China. The implementation of the spirit, and whether it is possible to introduce the third party organizations to the public participation process under the hearing system as an innovation point, in the fifth part of the article on solving the problems existing in the public participation in the hearing system, the general structure of the article is as follows: first of all in the introduction part of the reasons for the topic of the topic are said. The reason is that the reason for choosing this topic is that the public participation in social affairs is more and more active in the current society, the universal legal consciousness of the citizens has been promoted to a certain extent, and it has already understood the social background of the use of legal weapons to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, and to study the administrative jurisprudence studied in the stage of studying the master's degree. Knowledge has sprouted the idea of doing research on public participation mechanism under the hearing system. The second part of the article introduced the hearing system and the theory of public participation, expounded the value of the hearing system, the content of the procedure and so on, and explained the increase of the hearing system combined with the understanding and interpretation of the theory of public participation in the United States and some Chinese scholars. The third part enumerates the practice of the public participation mechanism under the hearing system of the United States and Germany, combined with the cases of the two countries' public participation, analyzes the specific provisions and performance of the public participation theory in the two countries' laws and regulations, and summarizes the initiation of the public participation mechanism under the hearing system of our country. In the fourth part, it points out some problems in the public participation mechanism in our hearing system, for example, the public participation consciousness is relatively weak on the whole level, and the laws and regulations of our country do not specify the content of the public participation, and the existing practical experience has been accumulated in the actual work. The qualification examination and selection criteria for the representative of the hearing are not very normative and scientific. The fifth part, on the basis of the analysis of the fourth part, discusses how to improve the public participation mechanism in the hearing system and put forward solutions. In the concluding part, the content of the full text and the views I have to be expressed in the full text are carried out. Hope to be able to contribute to the field of jurisprudence in this field.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 皮純協(xié),劉飛宇;論我國行政公開制度的現(xiàn)狀及其走向[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年01期

2 周云帆;;我國政府信息公開立法評析[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年06期

3 彭宗超,薛瀾;政策制定中的公眾參與——以中國價格決策聽證制度為例[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年05期

4 梁瑩;治理、善治與法治[J];求實(shí);2003年02期

5 俞可平;社會公平和善治是建設(shè)和諧社會的兩大基石[J];中國特色社會主義研究;2005年01期

6 姚永平,梁平;走向善治——中國基層民主治理模式探析[J];探索;2004年01期

7 苗月霞;治理理論與當(dāng)代中國政府治理模式的創(chuàng)新[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年03期

8 陳瑞華;程序正義的理論基礎(chǔ)——評馬修的“尊嚴(yán)價值理論”[J];中國法學(xué);2000年03期

本文編號：1947585