本文選題：食品安全 + 內(nèi)部舉報(bào)　； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：食品安全是民之根本,食品安全問題關(guān)系到社會(huì)生活的各個(gè)方面。如今社會(huì),食品安全問題卻屢見不鮮,各種各樣食品安全問題的出現(xiàn),為我們敲響警鐘。食品安全作為特殊的領(lǐng)域,具有影響范圍廣、后果嚴(yán)重性強(qiáng)等特點(diǎn),因此必須加強(qiáng)食品安全監(jiān)管。為了解決食品安全監(jiān)管中存在的問題,必須加強(qiáng)對(duì)食品安全監(jiān)管體系的研究力度。完善我國(guó)的食品安全監(jiān)管機(jī)制,不能僅僅依靠有限的政府監(jiān)管部門,而是需要發(fā)揮社會(huì)公眾的力量,通過調(diào)動(dòng)社會(huì)公眾的監(jiān)督積極性,擴(kuò)大監(jiān)督的力度和深度。在社會(huì)公眾的監(jiān)督隊(duì)伍中,食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)人則具有優(yōu)勢(shì)地位,內(nèi)部舉報(bào)人能夠更加清楚地了解食品安全行業(yè)中所存在的問題,對(duì)及時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)食品安全領(lǐng)域的違法行為,避免食品安全問題的出現(xiàn)具有重要意義。本文主要研究食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度,首先介紹食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度的基本理論。通過對(duì)食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度概念、法律屬性、法理基礎(chǔ)以及意義的描述,對(duì)食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度形成初步的了解,所謂的食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度即食品安全問題的知情人士,對(duì)其所知悉的“內(nèi)幕”向食品安全監(jiān)管部門進(jìn)行舉報(bào),有關(guān)部門給與相應(yīng)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)并提供全方位保護(hù)的制度。此制度與域外“吹哨人”制度具有相同的意義。因此,本文通過介紹美國(guó)、英國(guó)、日本關(guān)于“吹哨人”的相關(guān)制度,借鑒國(guó)外對(duì)于“吹哨人”制度的基本制度、獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)制度、保護(hù)措施、救濟(jì)程序的相關(guān)規(guī)定,進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)的食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度。通過研究國(guó)外“吹哨人”制度以及我國(guó)食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)制度的法律現(xiàn)狀,包括食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)制度的立法、實(shí)踐、實(shí)施效果等,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度中出現(xiàn)的問題,包括內(nèi)部舉報(bào)基本制度有所欠缺、獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)制度較為不健全、保護(hù)措施尚有不足、救濟(jì)程序不順暢四個(gè)方面。最后,本文針對(duì)我國(guó)食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)法律制度中存在的問題,提出了四方面的完善建議,包括完善食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)的基本制度、健全獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)制度、加強(qiáng)保護(hù)制度以及改進(jìn)救濟(jì)機(jī)制。本文認(rèn)為真正決定內(nèi)部舉報(bào)人是否提供舉報(bào)信息的關(guān)鍵是政府能夠提供有效的保護(hù),而獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)措施只能作為其中一種激勵(lì)手段,本制度的重點(diǎn)措施是對(duì)內(nèi)部舉報(bào)人的保護(hù)。為內(nèi)部舉報(bào)人提供貫穿始終、全程有效的保護(hù)措施,為內(nèi)部舉報(bào)人實(shí)施舉報(bào)解決后顧之憂,真正發(fā)揮食品安全內(nèi)部舉報(bào)制度的重要意義。
[Abstract]:Food safety is the root of the people, food safety issues related to all aspects of social life. Nowadays, the problem of food safety is common, and the emergence of all kinds of food safety problems is a wake-up call for us. Food safety, as a special field, has the characteristics of wide range of influence and severe consequences, so it is necessary to strengthen the supervision of food safety. In order to solve the problems existing in food safety supervision, we must strengthen the research on food safety supervision system. In order to perfect the food safety supervision mechanism of our country, we should not only rely on the limited government supervision department, but also need to give play to the power of the public and expand the intensity and depth of the supervision by arousing the enthusiasm of the public. In the supervisory team of the public, the internal informants of food safety have an advantageous position. The internal whistleblowers can understand more clearly the problems existing in the food safety industry, and timely discover illegal activities in the field of food safety. It is of great significance to avoid food safety problems. This article mainly studies the food safety internal report legal system, first introduces the food safety internal report law system basic theory. Through the description of the concept, legal attributes, legal basis and significance of the food safety internal reporting legal system, the preliminary understanding of the food safety internal reporting legal system is formed. The so-called internal reporting legal system of food safety, that is, the informed person of food safety problem, reports the "insider" to the food safety supervision department, and the relevant department gives the corresponding reward and provides the omni-directional protection system. This system has the same meaning as the overseas "whistler" system. Therefore, by introducing the relevant systems of "whistler" in the United States, Britain and Japan, this paper draws lessons from the relevant provisions of the basic system, the reward system, the protection measures and the relief procedures of the "whistler" system in foreign countries. Further improve our food safety internal reporting legal system. By studying the foreign "whistle-blowers" system and the current legal situation of the food safety internal reporting system in China, including the legislation, practice and implementation effect of the food safety internal reporting system, The problems in the internal reporting legal system of food safety in China are found, including the deficiency of the basic internal reporting system, the imperfect reward system, the insufficient protection measures and the unsmooth relief procedure. Finally, in view of the problems existing in the internal reporting legal system of food safety in China, this paper puts forward four suggestions for perfection, including perfecting the basic system of internal reporting of food safety, and perfecting the reward system. Strengthen the protection system and improve the relief mechanism. This paper holds that the key to decide whether internal whistleblower provides information is that the government can provide effective protection, and the incentive measures can only be used as one of the incentives, and the key measure of this system is the protection of internal whistleblowers. To provide effective protection measures throughout the whole process for internal whistleblowers, to solve the concerns of internal whistleblowers, and to give full play to the important significance of food safety internal reporting system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王倩;;保護(hù)“吹哨人”的勞動(dòng)法分析——基于德國(guó)司法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的考察[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2016年05期

2 詹強(qiáng);;行政法學(xué)視野中的“吹哨人”制度[J];福建行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

3 汪全勝;黃蘭松;;論我國(guó)食品安全有獎(jiǎng)舉報(bào)機(jī)制的完善——以北京、山東、廣東、海南的四省制度文本為考察對(duì)象[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2016年02期

4 韋文英;金江軍;姚衛(wèi)浩;;食品安全舉報(bào)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)政策研究(下)[J];食品界;2016年01期

5 衛(wèi)幼奕;;論食品安全有獎(jiǎng)舉報(bào)制度的法律困境及創(chuàng)新機(jī)制[J];食品安全導(dǎo)刊;2015年36期

6 殷春崢;陳波;謝錚;李侗桐;厲曙光;;借鑒西方“吹哨人法案”完善我國(guó)食品衛(wèi)生有獎(jiǎng)舉報(bào)制度[J];環(huán)境與職業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué);2015年06期

7 毋曉蕾;;美國(guó)和日本兩國(guó)激勵(lì)公眾參與食品安全監(jiān)管制度及其經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒[J];世界農(nóng)業(yè);2015年06期

8 張煒達(dá);王肖婧;;公眾參與食品安全有獎(jiǎng)舉報(bào)制度論析[J];重慶理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2015年02期

9 譚潔;;美國(guó)《吹哨人保護(hù)法案》對(duì)我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管的啟示[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年01期

10 許建宇;;勞動(dòng)者忠實(shí)義務(wù)論[J];清華法學(xué);2014年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 黨震;經(jīng)濟(jì)法視角下食品安全有獎(jiǎng)舉報(bào)制度研究[D];西北大學(xué);2015年

2 王雨;食品安全有獎(jiǎng)舉報(bào)制度研究[D];西南大學(xué);2014年

3 穆海蘊(yùn);食品安全舉報(bào)獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)保護(hù)機(jī)制研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2013年

4 劉薇;我國(guó)食品安全監(jiān)管中引入“吹哨法案”的法律思考[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1944656