本文選題：被訴行政行為 + 改變方式��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自1989年《中華人民共和國行政訴訟法》(下文簡稱《行政訴訟法》)頒布實施以來,被訴行政主體在訴訟過程中能否改變被訴行政行為一直是一個頗具爭議的話題。學(xué)界對這個問題展開過討論,并形成了“肯定說”、“否定說”和“折中說”等三種不同的觀點。截止到目前,理論界對被訴行政行為改變的概念界定還存在分歧,對被訴行政行為改變的性質(zhì)界定也存在“行政行為說”、“訴訟行為說”和“折中說”等多種不同的主張。理論界對被訴行政行為改變制度的爭論并沒有影響到其在司法實踐中的開展。在司法實踐中,被告改變被訴行政行為十分常見�？梢哉f,當(dāng)被訴行政主體在認(rèn)識到自己行為的違法或不當(dāng)?shù)那樾蜗?主動改變被訴行政行為,有利于緩解原、被告雙方的對立情緒,能夠及時的補救對相對人造成的損失,助于最終實現(xiàn)案結(jié)事了。但是,由于對被訴行政主體行為改變行為規(guī)制的缺失,不受約束的被訴行政主體改變行為帶來負(fù)面結(jié)果也逐漸顯現(xiàn)出來。由此,如何更好的規(guī)制被訴行政行為的改變成為另一個新的爭議焦點。為了更好的發(fā)揮被訴行政行為改變制度的積極效用,解決其在司法實踐中的實施產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面問題,必須對被訴行政行為改變制度進(jìn)行更加深入的理論分析,實現(xiàn)對被告改變被訴行政行為的有效規(guī)制,最終達(dá)到趨利避害的結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation and implementation of the Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Administrative Litigation Law) in 1989, it has been a controversial topic whether the subject of the accused administration can change the administrative act of the accused in the process of litigation. Scholars have discussed this issue and formed three different views: affirmative theory, negative theory and compromise theory. Up to now, there are still differences in the definition of the concept of the change of the administrative behavior of the accused in the theoretical circle, and there are many different opinions on the nature of the change of the administrative act of the accused, such as "the theory of administrative act", "theory of litigation act" and "eclectic theory". The debate on the system of change of administrative behavior has not affected its development in judicial practice. In judicial practice, it is very common for the defendant to change the administrative behavior of the accused. It can be said that when the accused administrative subject, in recognition of the illegal or improper situation of his own conduct, takes the initiative to change the administrative act being sued, it is conducive to alleviating the antagonistic feelings between the two sides of the accused, and can promptly remedy the losses caused to the relative person. It helped to bring the case to a close. However, due to the lack of regulation on the behavior change of the accused administrative subject, the unconstrained change of the administrative subject brings negative results. Therefore, how to better regulate the change of administrative behavior becomes another new focus of controversy. In order to give full play to the positive effect of the system of the change of the accused administrative behavior and to solve the negative problems arising from its implementation in the judicial practice, it is necessary to carry out a deeper theoretical analysis of the system of the change of the administrative act of the accused. To realize the effective regulation of the defendant to change the administrative behavior of the accused, and finally to achieve the result of seeking advantages and avoiding harm.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐昕;;司法建議制度的改革與建議型司法的轉(zhuǎn)型[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2011年02期

2 黃學(xué)賢;;行政訴訟中被告改變具體行政行為研究的學(xué)術(shù)梳理[J];法治研究;2010年12期

3 方世榮;周偉;;論促成被告改變具體行政行為的司法建議[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2010年04期

4 楊登峰;;程序違法行政行為的補正[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年06期

5 段小京;;《關(guān)于行政訴訟撤訴若干問題的規(guī)定》的理解與適用[J];人民司法;2008年03期

6 劉峰;;論行政訴訟判決形式的重構(gòu)——從司法權(quán)與行政權(quán)關(guān)系的角度分析[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2007年04期

7 李方民;;在沖突與回應(yīng)中實現(xiàn)訴訟秩序的和諧[J];山東審判;2007年02期

8 陸平輝;行政裁決訴訟的不確定性及其解決[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年06期

9 鐘芳,徐蘇剛;試論我國行政過錯責(zé)任追究制度[J];行政論壇;2005年05期

10 章志遠(yuǎn);行政訴訟法第51條規(guī)定之反思與修正[J];法治論叢;2003年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 葉必豐;;行政行為的治愈——具體行政行為錯誤的更正和瑕疵的補正[A];2014年政府法制研究[C];2014年

，

本文編號：1913199