發(fā)布時間：2018-05-18 10:42

  本文選題：行政處罰 + 現(xiàn)況分析��； 參考：《蘇州大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的 通過對2010-2012年蘇州市衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督所實施的行政處罰案例進行整理分析,了解行政相對人主要違法行為和衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督部門依法行政情況,分析違法行為的具體情況,找出行政相對人違法的高危環(huán)節(jié),也就是衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督工作的重點。同時探討行政處罰工作的經(jīng)驗和影響因素,為衛(wèi)生行政部門制定政策提供依據(jù),為建立職責明確、機構(gòu)健全、嚴格執(zhí)法的衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督機構(gòu)提出對策和建議,從而提高衛(wèi)生行政執(zhí)法公平、公正,促進依法行政水平。 方法 采用文獻查閱方法,圍繞研究內(nèi)容,通過中國知網(wǎng)、萬方數(shù)據(jù)知識服務(wù)平臺等文獻數(shù)據(jù)庫,收集包括期刊文獻、論文、政府機構(gòu)文件、法律法規(guī)等文獻。按照處罰案卷立案時間先后順序,對案卷中有關(guān)信息進行分析統(tǒng)計,用Excel建立數(shù)據(jù)庫,用統(tǒng)計軟件SPSS17.0對資料進行統(tǒng)計描述、卡方檢驗等。 結(jié)果 以工作檢查發(fā)現(xiàn)為來源的衛(wèi)生行政處罰案件數(shù)從2010年到2012年呈遞增趨勢,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=11.226,p0.05)；以社會舉報為來源的案件數(shù)從2010年到2012年呈遞減趨勢,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=57.733,p0.001)；以監(jiān)測報告為來源的案件數(shù)從2010年到2012年呈遞增趨勢,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=9.494,p=0.009)。 從行政處罰案件處罰種類分布情況來看,處罰種類為警告的衛(wèi)生行政處罰案件數(shù)2012年顯著低于前兩年,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=12.447,p=0.002)；處罰種類為罰款的案件數(shù)2011年顯著低于2010年和2012年,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=7.094,p=0.029)；處罰種類為警告、罰款及沒收違法所得或物品的案件,2010年到2012年呈遞增趨勢,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=16.125,p0.001)。 從行政處罰案件專業(yè)類別分布情況來看,餐飲服務(wù)、公共場所和消毒產(chǎn)品及傳染病三個類別案件數(shù)從2010年到2012年均呈遞增趨勢,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2分別為10.146,31.512,11.852,p值均0.05)；飲用水及涉水產(chǎn)品類案件數(shù)2011年和2012年顯著少于2010年,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(χ2=22.695,p0.001)。 結(jié)論 1、衛(wèi)生行政處罰案件主要來源于日常的衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督檢查,在加強日常衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督檢查的同時,需不斷拓寬衛(wèi)生行政處罰案件的來源,重視對投訴舉報、其他部門移送等方面案件線索的梳理。 2、處罰案件主要集中在1萬元以下,重大案件的查處能力較弱。日常衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督檢查中,發(fā)現(xiàn)線索的靈敏度和調(diào)查取證的能力不強。 3、餐飲服務(wù)領(lǐng)域查處力度較大,其他領(lǐng)域查處力度不足。 4、案件處罰領(lǐng)域狹窄,主要集中在部分違法領(lǐng)域。
[Abstract]:Purpose Through sorting out and analyzing the cases of administrative punishment imposed by the health supervision in Suzhou from 2010 to 2012, we can understand the main illegal acts of the administrative counterpart and the administrative situation of the health supervision department according to law, and analyze the specific situation of the illegal acts. Find out the high-risk link that the administrative relative person breaks the law, also is the focal point of the health supervision work. At the same time, it discusses the experience and influence factors of administrative punishment, provides the basis for health administrative departments to formulate policies, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for the establishment of health supervision agencies with clear responsibilities, sound institutions and strict law enforcement. In order to improve health administrative law enforcement fairness, justice, promote the level of administration according to law. Method This paper adopts the method of literature reference, and collects documents including periodical documents, papers, government agency documents, laws and regulations and so on, through the literature databases such as China knowledge Network, Wanfang data knowledge Service platform and so on. According to the order of the record filing time of the punishment file, the relevant information in the case file is analyzed and counted, the database is established by Excel, the data is described by the statistical software SPSS17.0, and the chi-square test is carried out. Result The number of cases of health administrative punishment from 2010 to 2012 showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012 (蠂 ~ 2 = 11.226p 0.05), and the number of cases reported by society was decreasing from 2010 to 2012. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 / 57.733 / p 0.001), and the number of cases from the monitoring report showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012 (蠂 ~ 2 / 9.494 / p 0.009). According to the distribution of punishment types in administrative punishment cases, the number of health administrative punishment cases with warning in 2012 was significantly lower than that in the previous two years, and the difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 / 12.447 / p 0.002). The number of cases with fines in 2011 was significantly lower than that in 2010 and 2012. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 / 7.094p ~ (0.029), and the types of punishment were warning, fines and confiscation of illegal gains or articles, which showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012 (蠂 ~ (2) (蠂 ~ (2) (16.125) (蠂 ~ (2) (P _ (0.001). From the distribution of professional categories of administrative punishment cases, the number of cases in the three categories of catering services, public places, disinfection products and infectious diseases showed an increasing trend from 2010 to 2012. The difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 = 10.146 鹵31.512 / 11.852), and the number of cases in drinking water and related water products in 2011 and 2012 was significantly lower than that in 2010 (蠂 ~ 2 = 22.695 / p 0.001). Conclusion 1. Health administrative punishment cases mainly come from routine health supervision and inspection. While strengthening daily health supervision and inspection, it is necessary to constantly broaden the sources of health administrative punishment cases and pay attention to reporting complaints. Other departments transfer and other aspects of the case clue combing. 2. Punishment cases are mainly under 10,000 yuan, and the ability to investigate and deal with major cases is weak. The sensitivity of finding clues and the ability to investigate and collect evidence are not strong in daily health supervision and inspection. 3, the catering service area investigation and punishment strength is big, the other domain investigation and punishment dynamics is insufficient. 4, the case punishment domain is narrow, mainly concentrates in the partial illegal domain.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.16;R197.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 左晨;李秋林;段玉林;周歆;王靜楠;;衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督派出機構(gòu)的建立及其工作模式[J];中國公共衛(wèi)生管理;2007年05期

2 謝生華;論行政處罰中當事人的申辯權(quán)——對行政處罰聽證程序的幾點思考[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2003年05期

3 伏曉;;衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督體制改革與衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督體系建設(shè)的進展和思考[J];北方藥學;2013年09期

4 王蛟;趙衡文;;125件醫(yī)療執(zhí)業(yè)行政處罰案件分析[J];實用預(yù)防醫(yī)學;2013年06期

5 高強;以"三個代表"重要思想為指導(dǎo),堅持科學發(fā)展觀,加快衛(wèi)生事業(yè)改革與發(fā)展——在2004年全國衛(wèi)生工作會議上的講話(摘要)[J];中國衛(wèi)生產(chǎn)業(yè);2004年05期

6 崔新;何翔;張文紅;王漢松;李程躍;張?zhí)煨?郝模;;我國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督體系的歷史沿革[J];中國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督雜志;2007年02期

7 谷政;蔣收獲;陳剛;王義;徐天強;孫梅;陳文;郝模;;我國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督領(lǐng)域現(xiàn)存問題界定研究[J];中國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督雜志;2008年01期

8 周雙橋;竇志勇;席荔梅;華偉;何繼綏;崔天壽;于開躍;;遼寧省農(nóng)村衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督體系建設(shè)調(diào)研報告[J];中國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督雜志;2009年04期

9 李延平;;試論我國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督機構(gòu)建設(shè)的基本模式[J];中國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督雜志;2009年06期

10 陸仲寅;;蘇州市衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督派出機構(gòu)建設(shè)現(xiàn)狀分析和對策[J];中國衛(wèi)生監(jiān)督雜志;2010年04期

，

本文編號：1905526