發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-18 08:46

  本文選題：云盤服務(wù)提供者 + 著作權(quán)�。� 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：因科技不斷進(jìn)步,云計(jì)算技術(shù)已由新興技術(shù)成長(zhǎng)為成熟技術(shù)。使用云計(jì)算技術(shù)的云盤作為一個(gè)新型網(wǎng)絡(luò)存儲(chǔ)服務(wù)進(jìn)入人們視線。云計(jì)算技術(shù)一重大特點(diǎn)就是使互聯(lián)網(wǎng)"非中心化",真正實(shí)現(xiàn)用戶之間的軟硬件資源共享。由于云計(jì)算技術(shù)在獲取資源、共享資源方面給用戶提供巨大便利,使其在我國(guó)乃至全球都得到廣泛的應(yīng)用。云盤服務(wù)集中體現(xiàn)了云技術(shù)的這些特點(diǎn),用戶之間可自由分享存儲(chǔ)文件,快捷便利并且?guī)缀趿阗M(fèi)用。云盤服務(wù)因其功能多樣性、存儲(chǔ)私密性與便捷性備受用戶青睞,當(dāng)前的云盤服務(wù)已經(jīng)初具規(guī)模,用戶數(shù)量趨于穩(wěn)定,盈利模式已然成熟。然而云盤服務(wù)給用戶提供便利同時(shí)也給侵權(quán)內(nèi)容傳播提供便利渠道。云盤服務(wù)提供者作為云盤服務(wù)產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈核心,具有義務(wù)預(yù)防直接侵犯著作權(quán)行為產(chǎn)生,或他人侵犯著作權(quán)行為結(jié)果擴(kuò)大。云盤服務(wù)提供者實(shí)質(zhì)上仍是一種信息存儲(chǔ)空間服務(wù)商,但由于云盤存儲(chǔ)空間較傳統(tǒng)信息存儲(chǔ)空間而言有更高私密性和封閉性,并且云盤存儲(chǔ)空間缺少公開運(yùn)營(yíng)平臺(tái),云盤服務(wù)提供者無(wú)法完全控制云盤空間中存儲(chǔ)文件及其公開傳播,這對(duì)云盤服務(wù)提供者保護(hù)著作權(quán)的義務(wù)和侵犯著作權(quán)責(zé)任的承擔(dān)會(huì)產(chǎn)生一定的影響。基于法律的規(guī)定以及可操作性和運(yùn)營(yíng)成本考慮,云盤服務(wù)提供者作為一類特殊的信息存儲(chǔ)空間服務(wù)商是否應(yīng)承擔(dān)用戶存儲(chǔ)或分享文件著作權(quán)審查義務(wù)各界觀點(diǎn)不一,但是相應(yīng)的注意義務(wù)是必須要盡到的,根據(jù)《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播保護(hù)條例》中規(guī)定"通知-刪除"規(guī)則,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者應(yīng)及時(shí)刪除侵權(quán)內(nèi)容、切斷分享鏈接在其接到著作權(quán)人或他人著作權(quán)侵權(quán)警告后。云盤服務(wù)提供者經(jīng)營(yíng)運(yùn)作模式也給其著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定帶來(lái)新難題。云盤服務(wù)提供者的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)分為直接侵權(quán)與間接侵權(quán),直接侵權(quán)由直接侵權(quán)行為與主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)構(gòu)成,間接侵權(quán)由間接侵權(quán)行為與主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)構(gòu)成。間接侵權(quán)行為分為教唆、引誘侵權(quán)行為及幫助侵權(quán)行為。主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)可以分為明知、應(yīng)知和未采取必要措施。在了解云盤服務(wù)侵犯著作權(quán)法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的同時(shí),更要找到合理侵權(quán)認(rèn)定規(guī)則來(lái)均衡各方利益,實(shí)現(xiàn)云盤產(chǎn)業(yè)的健康有序發(fā)展。本文先于第一章介紹云盤服務(wù)提供者的概念界定、云盤商業(yè)模式以及我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者立法現(xiàn)狀。在第二章分析云盤服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)侵權(quán)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與特殊性,著重分析"復(fù)制"內(nèi)涵的特殊性與云盤服務(wù)提供者注意義務(wù)特殊性。然后在第三章對(duì)云盤服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)表現(xiàn)形式及著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定分成直接侵權(quán)和間接侵權(quán)兩種形式進(jìn)行分析。最后第四章談?wù)勗票P服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的立法司法建議及規(guī)制措施。
[Abstract]:Cloud computing technology has grown from emerging technology to mature technology because of the continuous progress of science and technology. Cloud disk using cloud computing technology as a new type of network storage services into the line of sight. One of the major features of cloud computing technology is to make the Internet "decentralized" and realize the sharing of software and hardware resources between users. Cloud computing technology is widely used in our country and even the whole world because it provides great convenience for users to acquire and share resources. Cloud disk service embodies these characteristics of cloud technology, users can freely share storage files, quick, convenient and almost no cost. Cloud disk service is favored by users because of its diverse functions, storage privacy and convenience. The current cloud disk service has begun to take shape, the number of users tends to stabilize, and the profit model has matured. However, cloud disk service provides convenience to users and also provides convenient channels for the dissemination of infringing content. As the core of cloud disk service industry chain, cloud disk service providers have the obligation to prevent direct copyright infringement or the expansion of copyright infringement by others. Cloud disk service provider is still a kind of information storage space service provider, but cloud disk storage space is more private and closed than traditional information storage space, and cloud disk storage space is lack of open operating platform. Cloud disk service providers can not completely control the storage of files and their public dissemination in cloud disk space, which will have a certain impact on the obligations of cloud disk service providers to protect copyright and assume the responsibility for infringement of copyright. Based on the provisions of the law and the operational and operational costs, there are different views on whether the cloud disk service provider, as a special kind of information storage space service provider, should undertake the obligation of user to store or share the document copyright review. However, the corresponding duty of care must be fulfilled. According to the "Notification-Delete" rule stipulated in the regulations on the Protection of Information Network dissemination, network service providers should promptly delete the infringing content. Cut off the sharing link after it receives a warning of copyright infringement by the copyright owner or others. Cloud disk service provider operation mode also brings new problems to copyright infringement. The copyright infringement of cloud disk service provider can be divided into direct tort and indirect infringement, direct infringement consists of direct tort and subjective fault, indirect tort consists of indirect tort and subjective fault. Indirect infringement is divided into abetting, luring and aiding. Subjective fault can be divided into knowing, knowing and failing to take necessary measures. In order to realize the healthy and orderly development of cloud disk industry, it is necessary to find reasonable rules of copyright infringement in order to balance the interests of all parties in order to understand the legal risk of copyright infringement by cloud disk service. In the first chapter, this paper introduces the definition of cloud disk service provider, cloud disk business model and the legislation status of network service provider in our country. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the risk and particularity of copyright infringement of cloud disk service provider, focusing on the particularity of the connotation of "copy" and the particularity of service provider's duty of care. Then in the third chapter, the author analyzes the manifestation of copyright infringement of cloud disk service provider and the identification of copyright infringement, which are divided into direct infringement and indirect infringement. Finally, the fourth chapter discusses the legislative and judicial suggestions and regulatory measures of copyright infringement by cloud service providers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41;D922.16

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 黎永清,周正;獨(dú)臂老人,我向你鞠躬[J];中國(guó)民政;1994年10期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前7條

1 陳平　本報(bào)記者 袁天志;六枝云盤工商所“三結(jié)合”助推個(gè)私經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[N];貴州日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

2 鄒蘭邋冷文浩 鐘源;云盤山上的希望[N];涼山日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2008年

3 本報(bào)記者 葉菁;國(guó)內(nèi)云盤上演“搶客”大戰(zhàn) 免費(fèi)離線下載成殺手锏[N];通信信息報(bào);2013年

4 陳萍;云盤工商所 “四個(gè)到位”促“質(zhì)量興區(qū)”[N];六盤水日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

5 記者 史俊穎;利用優(yōu)勢(shì)發(fā)展特色農(nóng)業(yè) 增加農(nóng)民收入[N];四平日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

6 本報(bào)記者 王春波　李浩然 通訊員 張穎;云盤山養(yǎng)豬大戶的“致富經(jīng)”[N];楚雄日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2011年

7 陳萍;云盤工商所 凈化社會(huì)文化市場(chǎng)[N];六盤水日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 王帥;面向多云盤的終端透明加密存儲(chǔ)系統(tǒng)研究與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];解放軍信息工程大學(xué);2015年

2 王誠(chéng)翊;云盤用戶信息分享特征研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

3 雷微;基于屬性加密技術(shù)的云盤系統(tǒng)研究與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];西南交通大學(xué);2016年

4 張明;基于Android平臺(tái)的云盤客戶端的設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];河北師范大學(xué);2016年

5 李浩;基于百度云盤的高一物理學(xué)習(xí)網(wǎng)站的構(gòu)建[D];延安大學(xué);2016年

6 陸峰;基于FastDFS的企業(yè)私有云盤的設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

7 張楠;基于UCD的企業(yè)云盤及輔助硬件設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2016年

8 田瑋玉;云盤服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2017年

9 李慧;基于MooseFS的移動(dòng)云盤系統(tǒng)的研究與設(shè)計(jì)[D];大連理工大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1905198