本文選題：證明責(zé)任 + 懲罰性賠償��； 參考：《湖湘論壇》2017年06期

【摘要】：針對我國食品安全訴訟證明責(zé)任分配的特殊性,我國現(xiàn)行法上采取相關(guān)做法減輕對銷售者、經(jīng)營者存在過錯及損害與過錯之間存在因果關(guān)系的證明責(zé)任,即食品安全訴訟在適用證明責(zé)任正置的基礎(chǔ)上適用證明責(zé)任緩和原則,以此來緩解食品安全訴訟中消費者舉證難的困境,但仍無法有效解決食品安全訴訟舉證難問題。我國食品安全訴訟證明責(zé)任可以在適用舉證責(zé)任正置與緩和的基礎(chǔ)上,適當(dāng)考量在食品安全訴訟領(lǐng)域設(shè)置證明責(zé)任倒置規(guī)則,具體制度構(gòu)建可以從限制過錯責(zé)任適用范圍,在特殊類食品安全訴訟領(lǐng)域適用證明責(zé)任倒置以及明確適用主體,特殊食品缺陷證明責(zé)任倒置主體適用于生產(chǎn)者、銷售者兩方面進行考量。
[Abstract]:In view of the particularity of the distribution of the burden of proof in food safety litigation in our country, the relevant measures are adopted in the current law of our country to reduce the burden of proof of the fault of the seller, the operator and the causality between the damage and the fault. That is to say, food safety litigation applies the principle of mitigation of burden of proof on the basis of applying the burden of proof, so as to alleviate the plight of consumers' burden of proof in food safety litigation, but still can not effectively solve the difficult problem of proof in food safety litigation. The burden of proof in food safety litigation in our country can be properly considered on the basis of applying and abating the burden of proof, and the establishment of inverted rules of burden of proof in the field of food safety litigation can be carried out by restricting the scope of application of fault liability. In the field of special food safety litigation, the inversion of the burden of proof and the clear application of the main body, the special food defects of the burden inversion of the main body applicable to producers, sellers to consider two aspects.
【作者單位】： 中共湖南省委黨校 湖南行政學(xué)院;
【基金】：湖南省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)基金青年項目“基于懲罰性賠償?shù)霓r(nóng)村食品安全法律保護機制研究”(項目編號:16YBQ068)
【分類號】：D922.16;D925.1
，

本文編號：1858479