本文選題：房屋中介服務(wù) + 法律規(guī)制��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)如火如荼發(fā)展的同時,房屋中介服務(wù)行業(yè)也悄然興起,并迅猛發(fā)展,并逐漸成為房地產(chǎn)業(yè)所不可或缺的組成部分。現(xiàn)實中,房屋中介服務(wù)行業(yè)為消費者買房、賣房、租房等帶來了極大的便利,為其節(jié)省了不少的時間和精力,同時也推動、刺激這房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)的進一步發(fā)展。不過,房屋中介服務(wù)行業(yè)存在的問題也是我們所不能忽視的。由于,有利可圖,我國大大小小的房屋中介服務(wù)機構(gòu)數(shù)不勝數(shù),眾多的中介為了能在房屋中介服務(wù)行業(yè)中分一杯羹,往往無所不用其極,進而出現(xiàn)了諸多侵害消費者權(quán)益,擾亂市場秩序的違規(guī)違法行為,如“吃差價”、制造虛假信息、亂收費等等。這些違法現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的根源既是我國的房屋中介服務(wù)服務(wù)制度還不完善,存在著諸多的漏洞。本文即重點研究完善我國房屋中介服務(wù)制度的路徑,并分六部分來闡釋這一問題。 文章第一部分為緒論,主要探討三方面的內(nèi)容,即選題的現(xiàn)狀,研究意義,研究范圍以及研究方法,旨在為之后的研究奠定基礎(chǔ)。 文章第二部分對房屋中介服務(wù)進行了概述：第一,介紹了房屋中介的概念。第二,闡釋了我國房屋中介的發(fā)展沿革,分別探討了古代、近代以及現(xiàn)代我國房屋中介服務(wù)的概況。第三,界定了我國房屋中介服務(wù)合同的法律屬性。 文章第三部分主要我國房屋中介服務(wù)中存在的問題,并分析造就問題的原因。第一,我國房屋中介違法行為主要表現(xiàn)在隱瞞交易信息、吃差價、制造虛假信息、合同不規(guī)范亂收費等。第二,我國房屋中介違法行為的存在主要是由于我國房屋中介服務(wù)法律法規(guī)不健全、行業(yè)自律不夠以及政府監(jiān)管不力。 文章第四部分主要探討域外房屋中介服務(wù)立法的發(fā)展狀況,并重點分析美國、德國和我國臺灣的房屋中介相關(guān)立法,并在比較分析的基礎(chǔ)上,說明國外房屋中介服務(wù)立法對完善我國相關(guān)立法的啟示。 文章第五部分重點探討完善我國房屋中介服務(wù)立法的具體構(gòu)想,從法律法規(guī)完善方面展開,并提出具體的完善方案。 文章第六部分是結(jié)論,旨在對之前的研究進行簡要的總結(jié)分析。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the real estate industry, the housing intermediary service industry is also quietly rising, and rapid development, and gradually become an indispensable part of the real estate industry. In reality, housing intermediary service industry for consumers to buy, sell houses, rental housing and other brought great convenience, for it saved a lot of time and energy, but also promote, stimulate the further development of the real estate industry. However, the housing intermediary services industry is also the problem we can not ignore. As a result of the profit, there are numerous housing intermediary service organizations large and small in our country. In order to get a share of the housing intermediary service industry, many intermediaries often have nothing to do with it, and then a lot of consumers' rights and interests have been infringed. Illegal activities that disturb the market order, such as eating price difference, creating false information, charging fees and so on. The root of these illegal phenomena is that our housing intermediary service system is not perfect, there are many loopholes. This paper focuses on the path of perfecting the housing intermediary service system in China, and explains this problem in six parts. The first part of the article is the introduction, mainly discusses three aspects of the content, namely, the status quo of the topic, research significance, research scope and research methods, in order to lay a foundation for later research. The second part of the article summarizes the housing intermediary services: first, introduces the concept of housing intermediary. Secondly, it explains the history of the development of housing agency in China, and discusses the general situation of housing intermediary service in ancient, modern and modern China. Thirdly, it defines the legal attribute of the housing intermediary service contract in our country. In the third part, the main problems in China's housing intermediary service are analyzed, and the causes of the problems are analyzed. Firstly, the illegal behavior of housing intermediary in our country is mainly manifested in concealing transaction information, eating price difference, creating false information, and irregular charging of contract, etc. Second, the existence of the illegal behavior of the housing intermediary in our country is mainly due to the imperfect laws and regulations of the housing intermediary service, the insufficient self-discipline of the industry and the weak supervision of the government. The fourth part of the article mainly discusses the development of the legislation of housing intermediary service in foreign countries, and focuses on analyzing the relevant legislation of housing intermediary in the United States, Germany and Taiwan, and on the basis of comparative analysis. It explains the enlightenment of foreign housing intermediary service legislation on perfecting the relevant legislation of our country. The fifth part focuses on the concrete conception of perfecting the legislation of housing intermediary service in our country, and puts forward the concrete consummation plan from the aspect of perfecting the laws and regulations. The sixth part is the conclusion, which aims to summarize and analyze the previous research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.29;D923.6;D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳建榮;;論重慶房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀服務(wù)市場[J];重慶廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2007年02期

2 宋安成;;房地產(chǎn)中介行業(yè)的“亂象”與規(guī)范[J];城市開發(fā);2008年02期

3 羅凱遙;;房屋買賣居間合同的法律解析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2011年23期

4 呂志興;我國古代居間制度及其借鑒[J];當代法學(xué);2002年06期

5 稅兵;;居間合同中的雙邊道德風(fēng)險——以“跳單”現(xiàn)象為例[J];法學(xué);2011年11期

6 張永岳;我國房地產(chǎn)中介服務(wù)誠信體系的基本框架[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2003年05期

7 劉月;;房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀市場信息不對稱與政府監(jiān)管[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2007年03期

8 夏正鵬;;淺論房地產(chǎn)中介服務(wù)違規(guī)行為的規(guī)制[J];硅谷;2008年10期

9 應(yīng)仕海;;房屋居間合同案件審理的若干法律問題研究[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年06期

10 焦勝利;發(fā)展房地產(chǎn)中介服務(wù)業(yè)的制度建設(shè)研究[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2005年06期

，

本文編號：1813075