本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐 + 法律問(wèn)題　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著公民意識(shí)的增強(qiáng)，越來(lái)越多的人開(kāi)始利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)來(lái)行使公民的監(jiān)督權(quán)，這種大背景下，為網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐盛行提供了可能和前提。近年來(lái)，網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐的發(fā)展可謂是如火如荼，2004年就有“下跪書(shū)記”李信被李玉春網(wǎng)絡(luò)舉報(bào)，后來(lái)又有“局長(zhǎng)香艷日記”曝光，繼而雷政富“不雅視頻”被網(wǎng)上傳播，，接著表哥、表姐、房叔、房姐等一一進(jìn)入公眾視線。網(wǎng)絡(luò)因其開(kāi)放性和透明性被廣大網(wǎng)民所推崇，在打擊腐敗方面起到的作用不可小覷，網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐高效、快捷、普遍等優(yōu)點(diǎn)受到人們贊揚(yáng)，但同時(shí)網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐的缺陷我們也應(yīng)理性看待。 網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐是公民行使監(jiān)督權(quán)的過(guò)程，這個(gè)過(guò)程也是一個(gè)將被監(jiān)督者信息公開(kāi)的過(guò)程，那么哪些信息是可以公開(kāi)的，哪些問(wèn)題是不必公開(kāi)，如果被公開(kāi)的信息不能被核實(shí)還給被公開(kāi)信息者造成了一定的負(fù)面影響該怎么辦。這其中也會(huì)涉及到，名譽(yù)權(quán)、隱私權(quán)、言論自由和監(jiān)督權(quán)等權(quán)利間的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)問(wèn)題。網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐是普通公民通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)曝光腐敗行為，形成輿論熱點(diǎn)，促使有權(quán)監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)介入調(diào)查、處理，而并非是懲治腐敗的直接手段，有權(quán)監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)何時(shí)介入調(diào)查、如何介入調(diào)查、如何對(duì)事件進(jìn)行處理和回應(yīng)是我們需要思考的問(wèn)題，因?yàn)樵谟袡?quán)監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)介入過(guò)程中時(shí)機(jī)或方式不當(dāng)就有可能造成對(duì)無(wú)辜人員名譽(yù)或者隱私等權(quán)利的損害亦或者是放縱腐敗，讓違法分子逍遙法外。網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐之所以能夠迅速使腐敗被查處很大的原因來(lái)自網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論給監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)和司法機(jī)關(guān)的壓力，盡管這種壓力促成了腐敗案件查處，卻也極有可能影響司法公正，出現(xiàn)“網(wǎng)民審判”這樣與法治相悖的情形。另外，如果被網(wǎng)絡(luò)舉報(bào)案件不能被查實(shí)，舉報(bào)人是否要為反腐失誤承擔(dān)一定的責(zé)任，舉報(bào)人進(jìn)行網(wǎng)絡(luò)舉報(bào)時(shí)要承擔(dān)多大的證明義務(wù)，網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)布信息進(jìn)行舉報(bào)是否要受到約束等問(wèn)題尚無(wú)明確的法律規(guī)定。 本文將對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐的內(nèi)涵和途徑、特征及其實(shí)質(zhì)加以闡述，梳理和分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐所面臨的法律問(wèn)題，認(rèn)為這些問(wèn)題可以通過(guò)立法對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐進(jìn)行規(guī)范，完善監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)的工作機(jī)制，提升司法機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論的能力來(lái)解決。
[Abstract]:With the enhancement of citizen consciousness, more and more people begin to use the network to exercise the citizen's supervisory power, which provides the possibility and premise for the prevalence of network anti-corruption. In recent years, the development of online anti-corruption is in full swing. In 2004, "kneeling secretary" Li Xin was reported on the Internet by Li Yuchun. Later, "Director Xiangyan Diaries" came to light, and then Lei Chengfu's "indecent video" was disseminated online, followed by his cousin. Cousin, uncle, and so on into the public eye. Because of its openness and transparency, the Internet has been praised by the majority of Internet users for its role in fighting corruption. People praise the network for its advantages such as high efficiency, speed and universality in fighting corruption. But at the same time, the shortcomings of the network anti-corruption we should be rational. Network anti-corruption is a process in which citizens exercise their supervisory power. This process is also a process in which the information of the overseers is made public, so what information can be made public and what issues need not be made public. What if the published information can not be verified and returned to the disclosure of the information caused by some negative impact. It also involves the conflict and coordination between the rights of reputation, privacy, freedom of speech and supervision. Network anti-corruption is a direct means for ordinary citizens to expose corrupt behavior through network platform, form public opinion hot spots, urge supervision organs to intervene in investigation, deal with, but not punish corruption, and have the right to supervise when to intervene in investigations. How to intervene in the investigation, how to deal with and respond to the incident is a question we need to think about. Because improper timing or manner in the process of intervention with the authority to supervise may cause damage to the rights of innocent persons, such as reputation or privacy, or indulgence of corruption, allowing the lawbreakers to go unpunished. The great reason why Internet corruption can be quickly investigated and dealt with is due to the pressure placed on supervisory and judicial organs by public opinion on the Internet. Although this pressure has contributed to the investigation and handling of corruption cases, it is also highly likely to affect judicial justice. Appear "netizen adjudication" so with rule of law such circumstance. In addition, if a case reported on the Internet cannot be verified, does the whistleblower have to bear certain responsibilities for the corruption blunders, and how much burden of proof should the whistleblower bear when reporting on the Internet? There is no clear legal regulation on whether or not network information should be restricted. This article will explain the connotation, the way, the characteristic and the essence of the network anti-corruption, comb and analyze the legal problems that the network anti-corruption faces, and think that these problems can regulate the network anti-corruption through legislation. Improve the working mechanism of supervisory organs and improve the ability of judicial organs to deal with network public opinion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫恒山;“腐敗”概念的分析與刑法學(xué)思考[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年01期

2 譚世貴;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐的機(jī)理與規(guī)制[J];黨政干部文摘;2009年07期

3 陳興良;腐敗的成因及其抗制[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年06期

4 時(shí)延安;巨額財(cái)產(chǎn)來(lái)源不明罪的法理研析[J];法學(xué);2002年03期

5 李國(guó)青;楊瑩;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐事件曝光者的心理動(dòng)機(jī)解析[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

6 焦利;葉小川;;反腐敗的國(guó)內(nèi)立法問(wèn)題研究[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年04期

7 杜治洲;任建明;;我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐特點(diǎn)與趨勢(shì)的實(shí)證研究[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年02期

8 韓恒;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)公共輿論的生成與影響機(jī)制——兼論網(wǎng)絡(luò)反腐的內(nèi)在機(jī)理[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年02期

9 劉曄;楊蕾;;關(guān)于建立“官民聯(lián)動(dòng)”網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督新模式的探討[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年02期

10 姚建宗;法治與公共話語(yǔ)[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋為;公權(quán)腐敗的網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1811716