本文選題：行政立法 + 行政機(jī)關(guān)��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：不論是在理論上還是在實(shí)踐中,一個(gè)完整的行政立法監(jiān)督都包含外部監(jiān)督和行政系統(tǒng)內(nèi)部的監(jiān)督兩個(gè)方面,二者是相輔相成的,缺少了任何一個(gè)方面,行政立法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督都很難完整的發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的監(jiān)督作用,在我國(guó),對(duì)于行政立法的監(jiān)督主要是通過權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督,司法機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督以及社會(huì)公民及媒體輿論等方式來實(shí)現(xiàn),但是在實(shí)踐中,這些外部監(jiān)督方式都存在其局限性,比如說權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督,對(duì)于行政立法,其制定機(jī)關(guān)是行政機(jī)關(guān)而不是權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān),權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)針對(duì)專業(yè)性較強(qiáng)的行政領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的立法很難實(shí)現(xiàn)專業(yè)的監(jiān)督,而且在我國(guó)行政立法的數(shù)量已經(jīng)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)多于權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)立法的數(shù)量,要權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)針對(duì)龐大的行政立法實(shí)現(xiàn)全方位的監(jiān)督基本上是不可能實(shí)現(xiàn)的,權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)的工作重點(diǎn)也不是對(duì)于行政立法的監(jiān)督；作為司法機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督而言,要實(shí)現(xiàn)真正意義上的監(jiān)督也是不可能的,從我國(guó)目前的實(shí)際情況來看,司法權(quán)并沒有實(shí)現(xiàn)真正的獨(dú)立,司法權(quán)的行使還是會(huì)受到行政權(quán)或者其它權(quán)力的干涉,這樣的情形下,實(shí)現(xiàn)司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)行政立法的監(jiān)督基本上也不現(xiàn)實(shí)；而作為社會(huì)公眾以及媒體輿論,其監(jiān)督也是一種事后的監(jiān)督,因?yàn)樯鐣?huì)公眾對(duì)于行政立法的背景,過程等立法相關(guān)事項(xiàng)都不了解,監(jiān)督效果也不明顯。這些外在的監(jiān)督方式通常只能解決立法中的表面或者說淺層次的問題,并不能深入到立法中的內(nèi)部或者深層次來實(shí)現(xiàn)監(jiān)督,傳統(tǒng)觀點(diǎn)一般都認(rèn)為實(shí)現(xiàn)行政立法的監(jiān)督主要是依靠外部的監(jiān)督力量,往往忽略行政系統(tǒng)的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督,然而實(shí)際上,想要真正實(shí)現(xiàn)全面的行政立法監(jiān)督,除了要發(fā)揮外部的監(jiān)督,更重要的是要加強(qiáng)和發(fā)揮行政立法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督,通常來說,行政立法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督是一種行政機(jī)關(guān)的自我糾錯(cuò)制度,包括上下級(jí)行政機(jī)關(guān)之間,領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者和被領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者之間的相互監(jiān)督,這是行政機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部的一種自我檢查,自我預(yù)防的機(jī)制,它的直接性,高效性和專業(yè)性能夠節(jié)約成本,提高效率,使得監(jiān)督的積極效果最大化。 本文主要研究的問題就是行政立法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督,分析行政立法的含義,特征,指出我國(guó)現(xiàn)在內(nèi)部監(jiān)督的現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題,并借鑒學(xué)習(xí)國(guó)外幾個(gè)典型國(guó)家及我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出幾點(diǎn)建議來完善我國(guó)的行政立法內(nèi)部監(jiān)督。行政立法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督還存在很多的問題,加強(qiáng)行政內(nèi)部監(jiān)督還會(huì)遇到很多的阻礙,但是加強(qiáng)和完善行政立法內(nèi)部監(jiān)督是我國(guó)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家建設(shè)的必然要求,也是我國(guó)和諧社會(huì)建設(shè)的題中之意,所以完善行政立法的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督勢(shì)在必行。
[Abstract]:Whether in theory or in practice, a complete supervision of administrative legislation includes two aspects: external supervision and internal supervision of administrative system. The two aspects complement each other and lack any one aspect. The internal supervision of administrative legislation is very difficult to give full play to its proper supervisory role. In our country, the supervision of administrative legislation is mainly realized through the supervision of power organs, the supervision of judicial organs, the social citizens and media public opinion, etc. However, in practice, these external ways of supervision all have their limitations. For example, supervision by power organs. For administrative legislation, its formulation organs are administrative organs rather than power organs. It is very difficult for the power organs to carry out professional supervision for the legislation in the specialized administrative field. Moreover, the number of the administrative legislation in our country is far more than the number of the legislation of the power organs. It is basically impossible for the power organs to achieve omni-directional supervision over the huge administrative legislation, and the focus of the work of the power organs is not on the supervision of the administrative legislation; as the supervision of the judicial organs, It is also impossible to realize supervision in the true sense. Judging from the actual situation in our country, judicial power is not truly independent, and the exercise of judicial power will still be interfered with by the executive power or other powers. Under such circumstances, It is also basically unrealistic to realize the supervision of administrative legislation by the judicial organs. As the public and media public opinion, its supervision is also a kind of post-mortem supervision, because the social public has a background to the administrative legislation. Process and other legislation-related matters are not understood, the effect of supervision is not obvious. These external supervision methods usually only solve the superficial or superficial problems in legislation, and cannot go deep into the internal or deep level of legislation to realize supervision. The traditional view generally holds that the supervision of administrative legislation is mainly dependent on external supervisory power, and often neglects the internal supervision of administrative system. However, in fact, it is necessary to realize the comprehensive supervision of administrative legislation. In addition to external supervision, it is more important to strengthen and give full play to the internal supervision of administrative legislation. Generally speaking, internal supervision of administrative legislation is a self-correcting system of administrative organs, including between upper and lower administrative organs. The mutual supervision between the leader and the leader is a kind of self-examination and self-prevention mechanism within the administration. Its directness, efficiency and professionalism can save costs and improve efficiency. It maximizes the positive effect of supervision. This paper mainly studies the internal supervision of administrative legislation, analyzes the meaning and characteristics of administrative legislation, and points out the present situation and existing problems of internal supervision in China. Based on the experience of several typical foreign countries and Taiwan region, this paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the internal supervision of administrative legislation in our country. There are still many problems in the internal supervision of administrative legislation, and many obstacles will be encountered in strengthening the internal supervision of administrative legislation. However, strengthening and perfecting the internal supervision of administrative legislation is an inevitable requirement for the construction of a socialist country ruled by law in our country. It is also the meaning of the construction of harmonious society in China, so it is imperative to perfect the internal supervision of administrative legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王保民,李霞;我國(guó)行政立法范圍及其監(jiān)督審查機(jī)制[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

2 季煥爽;曲洋逸;;淺析人民法院之審判困境——以浙江海鹽“闖黃燈案”為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年35期

3 劉靜;淺議行政立法中存在的問題與對(duì)策[J];河南廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

4 鄧志宏;完善我國(guó)的行政立法監(jiān)督制度[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

5 李湘剛;;論我國(guó)行政立法監(jiān)督機(jī)制的完善[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年01期

6 王麗;論行政立法的程序控制[J];法學(xué)論壇;2002年05期

7 崔卓蘭;劉福元;;析行政自由裁量權(quán)的過度規(guī)則化[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2008年02期

8 雷豐超;對(duì)行政立法的控制及我國(guó)行政立法存在的問題[J];行政法學(xué)研究;1994年02期

9 李敏;;論行政立法的控制[J];鹽城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1803745