本文選題：食品安全 + 政府監(jiān)管�。� 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國近年來食品安全事件無論是從時間還是空間上,無論是從發(fā)生頻率還是輻射范圍,都是以往數(shù)十年無法超越的。食品安全事故頻發(fā)不僅對廣大消費者的個人及家庭健康造成許多可逆轉或不可逆轉的損害,也對國家食品產(chǎn)業(yè)造成了極其不良的后果,更甚至于,食品安全事件的監(jiān)管疏漏責任直指政府,公眾對政府的不信任與日俱增,嚴重影響了政府公信力。在食品安全監(jiān)管中,政府作為公共利益的保護者,公眾信賴的監(jiān)管者,市場運行的調控者,責任不可謂不重大。本文綜合應用語義分析、比較分析以及實證分析等研究方法,從行政法和經(jīng)濟法的角度,提出問題,分析問題,與發(fā)達國家橫向比較,詮釋法理,最終討論得到食品安全政府監(jiān)管責任的缺失及對策。在陳述我國現(xiàn)階段食品安全的監(jiān)管現(xiàn)狀,并分析政府責任的缺失,參考發(fā)達國家(日、美)的監(jiān)管經(jīng)驗后,最終得出三點對策。其一是完善政府立法責任。完善食品安全監(jiān)管法律法規(guī)、監(jiān)管預防體系、相關標準,加速推行食品信息追溯制度、食品召回制度與HACCP制度。其二是完善政府執(zhí)法責任。提高政府、監(jiān)管部門的監(jiān)管意識與執(zhí)法力度,提高食品安全檢測的科學技術水平,落實食品安全監(jiān)管不當?shù)淖坟煓C制。其三是完善政府賠償責任。食品安全事故導致了許多受害者的出現(xiàn),如果政府在監(jiān)管中沒有盡到監(jiān)管義務,那么政府對這些受害者應負有補充賠償責任。文中提到食品安全監(jiān)管中公務員引咎辭職制度,是2014年送審的食品安全法修改草案當中的亮點之一,政府賠償責任也是食品安全領域研究的熱點。論文研究內(nèi)容具有時代性和進步性,期望能夠對國家食品安全政府監(jiān)管體系的建設略盡綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:In recent years, food safety events in China, whether in time or space, in terms of frequency or radiation range, have been beyond the reach of the past decades. The frequent occurrence of food safety accidents not only causes a lot of reversible or irreversible damage to the health of the general consumers, but also causes extremely bad consequences to the national food industry, and even more, The government is directly responsible for the oversight of food safety incidents, and the growing public distrust of the government has seriously affected the credibility of the government. In the supervision of food safety, the government, as the protector of public interest, the supervisor of public trust and the regulator of market operation, is responsible. This paper synthetically applies semantic analysis, comparative analysis and empirical analysis, from the angle of administrative law and economic law, puts forward questions, analyzes problems, compares them horizontally with developed countries, and interprets jurisprudence. Finally, the lack of government supervision responsibility for food safety and its countermeasures are discussed. After stating the current situation of food safety supervision in China and analyzing the lack of government responsibility and referring to the regulatory experience of developed countries (Japan and the United States), three countermeasures were finally drawn. One is to perfect the government's legislative responsibility. Improve food safety supervision laws and regulations, supervision and prevention system, related standards, accelerate the implementation of food information traceability system, food recall system and HACCP system. The second is to improve the responsibility of government law enforcement. To improve the awareness of supervision and enforcement of the government and regulatory departments, to improve the scientific and technological level of food safety inspection, and to implement the improper accountability mechanism of food safety supervision. Third, improve the government liability for compensation. Food safety accidents have led to the emergence of many victims, and if the government fails to comply with its regulatory obligations, the government should have supplementary liability for these victims. It is one of the highlights of the revised draft of food safety law submitted for review in 2014 that civil servants take the blame and resign in food safety supervision. Government liability is also a hot spot in the field of food safety. The content of this paper is of time and progress, and it is expected to contribute a little to the construction of the government supervision system of national food safety.
【學位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關會議論文 前1條

1 韓民春;陳娟;羅濤;;中國食品安全監(jiān)管體系研究——基于制度經(jīng)濟學的思考[A];農(nóng)產(chǎn)品質量安全與現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展專家論壇論文集[C];2011年

，

本文編號：1803338