本文選題：國(guó)家賠償 + 精神損害��； 參考：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：新修訂的《國(guó)家賠償法》將精神損害賠償納入國(guó)家賠償范圍,是我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的重大進(jìn)步,使公民的精神利益有了更全面保障。然而,完善我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償之精神損害賠償制度任重而道遠(yuǎn)。在司法實(shí)踐中,國(guó)家賠償之精神損害賠償制度因規(guī)定過(guò)于原則、抽象而難以付諸實(shí)施。本文根據(jù)我國(guó)精神損害賠償制度的立法現(xiàn)狀和司法實(shí)踐,結(jié)合中外法學(xué)的研究成果,深入分析我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償制度,進(jìn)而提出完善我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償之精神損害賠償制度的觀點(diǎn)和構(gòu)想。 除了引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外,本文共四部分： 第一部分是國(guó)家賠償及其精神損害賠償基本理論介紹。本部分首先闡釋了國(guó)家賠償制度的概念、構(gòu)成要件等,是第四部分制度完善的基礎(chǔ)。接下來(lái),本部分分析了精神損害的特征,凸顯了制度完善的難點(diǎn)。進(jìn)一步地,本部分對(duì)國(guó)家侵權(quán)之精神損害賠償制度與民事侵權(quán)之精神損害賠償制度進(jìn)行了比較。最后,本部分闡明了我國(guó)新《國(guó)家賠償法》將精神損害納入國(guó)家賠償范圍的意義所在。 第二部分比較分析了兩大法系典型國(guó)家的相關(guān)制度,為我國(guó)制度的完善提供借鑒。 第三部分分析了我國(guó)國(guó)家賠償之精神損害賠償制度的現(xiàn)狀與不足�！秶�(guó)家賠償法》第35條規(guī)定：“致人精神損害的,應(yīng)當(dāng)在侵權(quán)行為影響的范圍內(nèi),為受害人消除影響,恢復(fù)名譽(yù),賠禮道歉；造成嚴(yán)重后果的,應(yīng)當(dāng)支付相應(yīng)的精神損害撫慰金。”由于社會(huì)文化、經(jīng)濟(jì)等各種因素,我國(guó)現(xiàn)行國(guó)家賠償之精神損害賠償制度剛剛萌芽,實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)不足,制度本身仍存在一系列缺陷,如使用一些類似于“嚴(yán)重后果”、“相應(yīng)的”等模糊性詞語(yǔ),使得該制度難以成為“活法”。 第四部分從適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、賠償范圍、賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等方面提出了制度完善的相關(guān)建議。由于精神損害的特殊性,在短時(shí)期內(nèi)做出像財(cái)產(chǎn)損害賠償制度那樣具體的制度規(guī)則是不可能的,但現(xiàn)行規(guī)定過(guò)于原則抽象,缺乏可操作性。若不進(jìn)一步細(xì)化,則國(guó)家賠償之精神損害賠償制度將會(huì)是名存實(shí)亡。
[Abstract]:The newly revised "State compensation Law" brings the compensation for mental damage into the scope of state compensation, which is a major progress in the construction of the rule of law in China and provides a more comprehensive guarantee for the spiritual interests of citizens.However, there is a long way to go to perfect the system of state compensation for mental damage.In judicial practice, the system of state compensation for mental damages is too abstract to be put into practice because of its excessive principle.According to the current legislative situation and judicial practice of the system of compensation for mental damage in China, this paper, combined with the research results of Chinese and foreign jurisprudence, deeply analyzes the national compensation system of our country.Then put forward the point of view and conception of perfecting the mental damage compensation system of the state compensation in our country.In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of four parts:The first part is the introduction of the basic theory of national compensation and mental damage compensation.This part first explains the concept of the national compensation system, the elements and so on, which is the foundation of the fourth part.Then, this part analyzes the characteristics of mental damage, highlights the difficulties of system improvement.Further, this part compares the national tort compensation system with the civil tort compensation system.Finally, this part clarifies the significance of the new State compensation Law to bring mental damage into the scope of state compensation.The second part makes a comparative analysis of the relevant systems in the typical countries of the two major legal systems, and provides reference for the perfection of the system in our country.To restore reputation and make an apology; if serious consequences are caused, the corresponding compensation for moral damage shall be paid. "Due to social, cultural, economic and other factors, the current national compensation system for spiritual damages in China has just sprouted, with insufficient practical experience, and the system itself still has a series of defects, such as the use of some similar to "serious consequences".The vague words such as "corresponding" make the system difficult to become "living method".The fourth part puts forward the system perfect suggestion from the application standard, the compensation scope, the compensation standard and so on.Because of the particularity of mental damage, it is impossible to make specific rules like the compensation system for property damage in a short period of time, but the current regulations are too abstract and lack of maneuverability.Without further refinement, the state compensation system for mental damage will exist in name only.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳伯禮;徐信貴;;國(guó)家侵權(quán)之精神損害賠償假設(shè)[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 王喜珍;;國(guó)家侵權(quán)精神損害撫慰制度實(shí)施問(wèn)題探討[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年02期

3 周佑勇;;裁量基準(zhǔn)的制度定位——以行政自制為視角[J];法學(xué)家;2011年04期

4 陳利華;;關(guān)于完善國(guó)家精神損害賠償制度的思考[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2011年11期

5 孔悅;;論國(guó)家賠償法中精神損害賠償制度的完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年15期

6 謝秀珍;;論國(guó)家侵權(quán)中的精神損害賠償[J];工會(huì)論壇(山東省工會(huì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年01期

7 張運(yùn)鴻;王謹(jǐn);;國(guó)家賠償之精神損害賠償制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2011年12期

8 陳美玲;王國(guó)良;;試論我國(guó)《國(guó)家賠償法》的立法完善——以服務(wù)型政府為視角[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年05期

9 鄭宏敏;;淺論《國(guó)家賠償法》的歸責(zé)原則[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

10 楊錫武;龔擁軍;;論國(guó)家精神損害賠償量化標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之構(gòu)建[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1744688